Nutritional Counseling During Chemotherapy Treatment: A Systematic Review of Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.3390/curroncol32010003
Shalet James, Alexie Oppermann, Kaitlin M Schotz, Mackenzie M Minotti, Gautam G Rao, Ian R Kleckner, Brenton J Baguley, Amber S Kleckner
{"title":"Nutritional Counseling During Chemotherapy Treatment: A Systematic Review of Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy.","authors":"Shalet James, Alexie Oppermann, Kaitlin M Schotz, Mackenzie M Minotti, Gautam G Rao, Ian R Kleckner, Brenton J Baguley, Amber S Kleckner","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dietary interventions during chemotherapy hold promise for clinical and supportive care outcomes. We systematically investigated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of nutritional counseling conducted during chemotherapy. Studies prospectively implemented nutrition counseling during chemotherapy. Articles were identified from three databases-EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS-from inception to 1 October 2024. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of outcome data were extracted. Among 44 publications, 39 studies recruited 98 ± 80 participants (range 15-360); 38/39 (97%) were randomized controlled trials. One-third (31%) were among patients with breast cancer. Interventions were divided into individualized nutritional counseling (<i>n</i> = 21), nutrition counseling plus exercise (<i>n</i> = 13), and nutrient-specific dietary patterns (<i>n</i> = 10). Many had goals to achieve established nutrition guidelines. Feasibility was high based on attendance at counseling sessions, retention, and/or food log analysis. Overall, there were minimal adverse events related to the interventions. Many studies showed between-group differences favoring the intervention group for body weight (8/24, gain or loss, according to goals), nutritional status (8/9), quality of life (3/10 without and 6/9 with exercise), cancer-related fatigue (7/10), chemotherapy tolerance (6/11), and treatment responses (3/13). In conclusion, nutritional interventions were feasible and safe for patients undergoing chemotherapy and demonstrated preliminary efficacy to improve nutritional status, fatigue, chemotherapy tolerance, and other outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11764068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32010003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dietary interventions during chemotherapy hold promise for clinical and supportive care outcomes. We systematically investigated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of nutritional counseling conducted during chemotherapy. Studies prospectively implemented nutrition counseling during chemotherapy. Articles were identified from three databases-EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS-from inception to 1 October 2024. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of outcome data were extracted. Among 44 publications, 39 studies recruited 98 ± 80 participants (range 15-360); 38/39 (97%) were randomized controlled trials. One-third (31%) were among patients with breast cancer. Interventions were divided into individualized nutritional counseling (n = 21), nutrition counseling plus exercise (n = 13), and nutrient-specific dietary patterns (n = 10). Many had goals to achieve established nutrition guidelines. Feasibility was high based on attendance at counseling sessions, retention, and/or food log analysis. Overall, there were minimal adverse events related to the interventions. Many studies showed between-group differences favoring the intervention group for body weight (8/24, gain or loss, according to goals), nutritional status (8/9), quality of life (3/10 without and 6/9 with exercise), cancer-related fatigue (7/10), chemotherapy tolerance (6/11), and treatment responses (3/13). In conclusion, nutritional interventions were feasible and safe for patients undergoing chemotherapy and demonstrated preliminary efficacy to improve nutritional status, fatigue, chemotherapy tolerance, and other outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化疗期间的营养咨询:可行性、安全性和有效性的系统评价。
化疗期间的饮食干预有望获得临床和支持性护理结果。我们系统地调查了化疗期间进行营养咨询的可行性、安全性和有效性。研究前瞻性地在化疗期间实施营养咨询。文章从embase、Cochrane Library和scopus这三个数据库中检索,时间从数据库建立到2024年10月1日。提取结果数据的可行性、安全性和有效性。44篇出版物中,39篇研究招募了98±80名受试者(范围15-360);38/39(97%)为随机对照试验。三分之一(31%)是乳腺癌患者。干预措施分为个体化营养咨询(n = 21)、营养咨询加运动(n = 13)和营养特定饮食模式(n = 10)。许多人的目标是达到既定的营养指南。基于咨询会议的出席率、保留率和/或饮食记录分析,可行性很高。总体而言,与干预措施相关的不良事件最少。许多研究显示,干预组在体重(8/24,根据目标增加或减少)、营养状况(8/9)、生活质量(不运动3/10,运动后6/9)、癌症相关疲劳(7/10)、化疗耐受性(6/11)和治疗反应(3/13)方面存在组间差异。综上所述,对化疗患者进行营养干预是可行和安全的,并在改善营养状况、疲劳、化疗耐受性等预后方面显示出初步疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
Interplay Between p53 and Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in Colorectal Cancer: Associations with Mismatch Repair Status, Tumor Microenvironment, and Clinicopathological Outcomes. Hepatitis B Virus Infection Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Liver Metastasis in Gastric Cancer. Pharmacist-Led Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Systematic Review. Dermatomyositis as a Paraneoplastic Syndrome of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. Bridging Perspectives: How Canadian Patients and Caregivers View Quality of Life in Multiple Myeloma Compared to Validated Instruments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1