Differences in Personality Between High-Ability and Average-Ability University Students.

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.3390/jintelligence13010007
Juan Francisco Flores-Bravo, Elena Rodríguez-Naveiras, María de Los Dolores Valadez Sierra, Dylan Costantini, África Borges
{"title":"Differences in Personality Between High-Ability and Average-Ability University Students.","authors":"Juan Francisco Flores-Bravo, Elena Rodríguez-Naveiras, María de Los Dolores Valadez Sierra, Dylan Costantini, África Borges","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence13010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the growing body of research examining the personality traits of individuals with high abilities, little clarity exists about how they differ from the general population, especially within the university context. This study aimed to identify distinct personality traits by examining 268 high-ability university students alongside a matched average-ability group through a retrospective ex post facto design. Results revealed significant differences only in the trait of responsibility (<i>p</i> = 0.037), with lower scores observed among high-ability students. This outcome may be related to specific academic environmental factors, such as insufficient challenges. It can be concluded that, although stereotypes often associate high-ability students with certain personality traits, such as openness to experience, the present results do not reflect such differences. Therefore, it is important to conduct well-designed studies to determine the characteristics of high-ability individuals and how they differ from average-ability students.</p>","PeriodicalId":52279,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligence","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11765854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13010007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the growing body of research examining the personality traits of individuals with high abilities, little clarity exists about how they differ from the general population, especially within the university context. This study aimed to identify distinct personality traits by examining 268 high-ability university students alongside a matched average-ability group through a retrospective ex post facto design. Results revealed significant differences only in the trait of responsibility (p = 0.037), with lower scores observed among high-ability students. This outcome may be related to specific academic environmental factors, such as insufficient challenges. It can be concluded that, although stereotypes often associate high-ability students with certain personality traits, such as openness to experience, the present results do not reflect such differences. Therefore, it is important to conduct well-designed studies to determine the characteristics of high-ability individuals and how they differ from average-ability students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高能力大学生与一般能力大学生的人格差异
尽管越来越多的研究研究了高能力个体的人格特征,但他们与一般人群的区别却很少,尤其是在大学背景下。本研究通过回顾性的事后设计,对268名高能力大学生和匹配的平均能力组进行了调查,旨在确定不同的人格特征。结果显示,只有在责任特质上存在显著差异(p = 0.037),高能力学生的得分较低。这种结果可能与特定的学术环境因素有关,例如挑战不足。由此可以得出结论,尽管刻板印象经常将高能力学生与某些性格特征联系在一起,比如对经验的开放性,但目前的结果并没有反映出这种差异。因此,进行精心设计的研究来确定高能力个体的特征以及他们与一般能力学生的区别是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligence
Journal of Intelligence Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Teachers' Self-Efficacy in Dyscalculia: Development and Psychometric Validation of a New Scale. Predictors of Psychological Well-Being Among Pre-Service Teachers: Emotional Intelligence and Occupational Anxiety. The Moderating Role of Intelligence and Prior Knowledge for the Effectiveness of a Computer-Based Mathematics Intervention in Students with Low Mathematics Performance. Beyond IQ: Systemic Resources in STEM Achievement. Dark Emotions Are Not Always Bad: The Role of Emotions and Professional Training in Predicting Patterns of Engagement and Burnout Among Preschool Teachers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1