Comparative outcomes of proximal fibular osteotomy versus high tibial osteotomy in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis: A retrospective analysis.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Acta orthopaedica Belgica Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.52628/90.4.12000
Hünkar Cagdas Bayrak, Ibrahim Faruk Adiguzel, Mahircan Demir, Bekir Karagöz, Samed Ordu
{"title":"Comparative outcomes of proximal fibular osteotomy versus high tibial osteotomy in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis: A retrospective analysis.","authors":"Hünkar Cagdas Bayrak, Ibrahim Faruk Adiguzel, Mahircan Demir, Bekir Karagöz, Samed Ordu","doi":"10.52628/90.4.12000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a widely used procedure for delaying knee arthroplasty, correcting alignment, and relieving symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Recently, proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO) has emerged as a less invasive and more cost-effective alternative. This study compares the outcomes of HTO and PFO to evaluate whether PFO can deliver results comparable to HTO in similar patient populations. A total of 96 patients treated between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed, with 54 patients undergoing HTO and 42 undergoing PFO. Subgroups were also created based on body mass index (BMI): non-obese HTO, obese HTO, non-obese PFO, and obese PFO. For each patient, we recorded demographic data, preoperative and 1-year postoperative Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, medial joint space (MJS) measurements, mechanical axis deviations (MAD), Kellgren- Lawrence grade (KL), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and any complications. Both HTO and PFO led to significant improvements in OKS, VAS, MJS width, and MAD. Age, KL grade distribution, BMI, and MPTA values were comparable across the groups. Overall, HTO showed superior clinical (OKS, VAS) and radiological (MJS, MAD) outcomes, particularly in non-obese patients. Among obese patients, HTO and PFO achieved similar clinical improvements, although HTO maintained a radiological advantage. Importantly, a lower preoperative MPTA was associated with poorer clinical outcomes in the PFO group. In conclusion, while PFO can produce meaningful clinical and radiological improvements, HTO remains the more effective option in terms of both clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with a BMI below 30. For patients with a BMI over 30, HTO preserves its radiological superiority, although its clinical benefits are comparable to those of PFO. Additionally, a low preoperative MPTA is significantly linked to worse OKS scores in patients undergoing PFO.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"90 4","pages":"629-638"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/90.4.12000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a widely used procedure for delaying knee arthroplasty, correcting alignment, and relieving symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Recently, proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO) has emerged as a less invasive and more cost-effective alternative. This study compares the outcomes of HTO and PFO to evaluate whether PFO can deliver results comparable to HTO in similar patient populations. A total of 96 patients treated between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed, with 54 patients undergoing HTO and 42 undergoing PFO. Subgroups were also created based on body mass index (BMI): non-obese HTO, obese HTO, non-obese PFO, and obese PFO. For each patient, we recorded demographic data, preoperative and 1-year postoperative Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, medial joint space (MJS) measurements, mechanical axis deviations (MAD), Kellgren- Lawrence grade (KL), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and any complications. Both HTO and PFO led to significant improvements in OKS, VAS, MJS width, and MAD. Age, KL grade distribution, BMI, and MPTA values were comparable across the groups. Overall, HTO showed superior clinical (OKS, VAS) and radiological (MJS, MAD) outcomes, particularly in non-obese patients. Among obese patients, HTO and PFO achieved similar clinical improvements, although HTO maintained a radiological advantage. Importantly, a lower preoperative MPTA was associated with poorer clinical outcomes in the PFO group. In conclusion, while PFO can produce meaningful clinical and radiological improvements, HTO remains the more effective option in terms of both clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with a BMI below 30. For patients with a BMI over 30, HTO preserves its radiological superiority, although its clinical benefits are comparable to those of PFO. Additionally, a low preoperative MPTA is significantly linked to worse OKS scores in patients undergoing PFO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of the role of carbon fibre reinforced polyetheretherketone and titanium intramedullary nails in patients with metastatic bone disease. Origin of proximal femur fracture classification and their namegivers. Percutaneous Intra-meniscal platelet-rich plasma injection for meniscal tears: A mid-term. Rectangular femoral stems can successfully accommodate the medullary canal in patients with severe hip dysplasia operated on with total hip arthroplasty and a shortening osteotomy: A morphometric study. The Clinical Efficacy of the Regeneten Bioinductive Implant in Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1