Interim Results of Rigicon Penile Prosthesis Implantation in a Single Center: The Largest Series in Türkiye.

IF 1.1 0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology research & practice Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.5152/tud.2025.24122
Muhammet İhsan Karaman, Rasim Güzel, Duygu Kirkik, Orhan Koca
{"title":"Interim Results of Rigicon Penile Prosthesis Implantation in a Single Center: The Largest Series in Türkiye.","authors":"Muhammet İhsan Karaman, Rasim Güzel, Duygu Kirkik, Orhan Koca","doi":"10.5152/tud.2025.24122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze data from patient information forms (PIFs) submitted to the manufacturer of a new 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP), the Rigicon Infla10® , to summarize interim outcomes of 250 implantations in a single center, which is the largest series in Türkiye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of PIFs from 250 patients implanted with the IPP between January 2021 and December 2023 was performed to assess patient characteristics, surgical data, device durability, patient satisfaction, and rates of reoperation for any reason.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ± SD (range) follow-up was 21.2 ± 8.7 (6-36) months and the mean ± SD patient age was 56.2 ± 9.1 years. The average surgical time was 47 minutes. Of the total, 2.4% of devices required removal or revision. Mechanical failure of the device was reported in 3 patients (1.2%). One patient (0.4%) required revision for noise during pumping. Two patients (0.8%) requested device removal because of dissatisfaction. No infections were observed in this series. A total of 97.6% of the Rigicon Infla10® devices were free from explant or revision. The satisfaction rate based on a single question asked to the patient by the surgeon 6 months after surgery was 98.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All Rigicon Infla10® IPPs implanted in the center prior to January 2024 were included in the retrospective analysis of volunteered PIFs. Initial durability from reoperation was demonstrated to be superior compared to other contemporary devices. Additionally, high satisfaction with treatment outcomes was reported by 92.4% of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":"50 4","pages":"234-239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2025.24122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze data from patient information forms (PIFs) submitted to the manufacturer of a new 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP), the Rigicon Infla10® , to summarize interim outcomes of 250 implantations in a single center, which is the largest series in Türkiye.

Methods: A retrospective review of PIFs from 250 patients implanted with the IPP between January 2021 and December 2023 was performed to assess patient characteristics, surgical data, device durability, patient satisfaction, and rates of reoperation for any reason.

Results: The mean ± SD (range) follow-up was 21.2 ± 8.7 (6-36) months and the mean ± SD patient age was 56.2 ± 9.1 years. The average surgical time was 47 minutes. Of the total, 2.4% of devices required removal or revision. Mechanical failure of the device was reported in 3 patients (1.2%). One patient (0.4%) required revision for noise during pumping. Two patients (0.8%) requested device removal because of dissatisfaction. No infections were observed in this series. A total of 97.6% of the Rigicon Infla10® devices were free from explant or revision. The satisfaction rate based on a single question asked to the patient by the surgeon 6 months after surgery was 98.4%.

Conclusion: All Rigicon Infla10® IPPs implanted in the center prior to January 2024 were included in the retrospective analysis of volunteered PIFs. Initial durability from reoperation was demonstrated to be superior compared to other contemporary devices. Additionally, high satisfaction with treatment outcomes was reported by 92.4% of patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rigicon阴茎假体单中心植入的中期结果: rkiye中最大的系列。
目的:分析提交给新型3片式充气阴茎假体(IPP)制造商Rigicon Infla10®的患者信息表(pif)的数据,总结单个中心250例植入的中期结果,这是 rkiye中最大的系列。方法:对2021年1月至2023年12月期间植入IPP的250例患者的pif进行回顾性分析,以评估患者特征、手术数据、设备耐久性、患者满意度和任何原因的再手术率。结果:平均±SD(范围)随访时间为21.2±8.7(6-36)个月,平均±SD患者年龄为56.2±9.1岁。平均手术时间为47分钟。在总数中,2.4%的设备需要移除或修改。3例(1.2%)患者报告了该装置的机械故障。1例患者(0.4%)因泵送过程中的噪音需要进行翻修。2名患者(0.8%)因不满意而要求取出器械。在该系列中未观察到感染。共有97.6%的Rigicon Infla10®设备没有外植体或翻修。术后6个月外科医生对患者的单一问题满意度为98.4%。结论:所有2024年1月前植入中心的Rigicon Infla10®ipp均纳入自愿pif的回顾性分析。与其他当代设备相比,再次手术的初始耐久性被证明是优越的。92.4%的患者对治疗结果满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Prospective Study of the Incidence and Characteristics of Post-Obstructive Diuresis Following Pyeloplasty for Unilateral Pelvi-Ureteric Junction Obstruction. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Vs. Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Small-Volume Prostates: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes. Efficacy of D-Mannose Monotherapy vs. Other Agents in Preventing Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Is Standard TRUS-Guided Prostate Biopsy the End of the Game? Retrograde Intrarenal Renal Surgery versus Supine Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy in Treatment of Renal Pelvic Stones Less than 2 cm, Randomized Clinical Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1