[Perception of patient safety culture in a high-complexity hospital and improvement actions].

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.12.005
J M Aranaz Andrés, M A Espinel Ruiz, F Roldan Moll
{"title":"[Perception of patient safety culture in a high-complexity hospital and improvement actions].","authors":"J M Aranaz Andrés, M A Espinel Ruiz, F Roldan Moll","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The culture of patient safety is reflected in the behavior of individuals within a healthcare organization, based on knowledge, beliefs, and values aimed at minimizing the harm that patients might suffer. Assessing the perception of safety culture helps in developing and implementing improvement actions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A descriptive study conducted in two phases. A patient safety culture questionnaire measuring three dimensions of the safety culture was administered, and improvement actions were developed based on the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>300 responses were obtained, with a response rate of 10.2%. 70% were women, 40% were physicians, and 38% were nurses. 37% reported having worked at the hospital for more than 20years. The management support for patient safety dimension received 33% (CI: 29.5-35.7) of positive responses and 27% (CI: 24.3-30.2) of negative responses. The patient safety perception dimension received 67% (CI: 63.8-70.01) of positive responses and 20% (CI: 17.4-22.8) of negative responses. The supervisor/department head support for patient safety dimension received 61% (CI: 57.4-63.9) of positive responses and 19% (CI: 16.3-21.5) of negative responses. After presenting the results to the management team, improvement actions were proposed, which led to greater commitment from the management team to patient safety, increased presence during patient safety rounds, and greater visibility of patient safety-related information available on the intranet.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A low perception of management support was detected, allowing for improvements in this dimension.</p>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.12.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The culture of patient safety is reflected in the behavior of individuals within a healthcare organization, based on knowledge, beliefs, and values aimed at minimizing the harm that patients might suffer. Assessing the perception of safety culture helps in developing and implementing improvement actions.

Materials and methods: A descriptive study conducted in two phases. A patient safety culture questionnaire measuring three dimensions of the safety culture was administered, and improvement actions were developed based on the results.

Results: 300 responses were obtained, with a response rate of 10.2%. 70% were women, 40% were physicians, and 38% were nurses. 37% reported having worked at the hospital for more than 20years. The management support for patient safety dimension received 33% (CI: 29.5-35.7) of positive responses and 27% (CI: 24.3-30.2) of negative responses. The patient safety perception dimension received 67% (CI: 63.8-70.01) of positive responses and 20% (CI: 17.4-22.8) of negative responses. The supervisor/department head support for patient safety dimension received 61% (CI: 57.4-63.9) of positive responses and 19% (CI: 16.3-21.5) of negative responses. After presenting the results to the management team, improvement actions were proposed, which led to greater commitment from the management team to patient safety, increased presence during patient safety rounds, and greater visibility of patient safety-related information available on the intranet.

Conclusions: A low perception of management support was detected, allowing for improvements in this dimension.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
[Perception of patient safety culture in a high-complexity hospital and improvement actions]. [Quality of organizations and the system: It is not the same]. The person-centered medical care in pediatrics: A scoping review. [Exploring the voice of patients: Mapping their experience following care in an integrated health area]. [Humanization and professional quality of life in oncohematology and radiotherapy care: A descriptive study in a university hospital].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1