Ejaculation-sparing enucleation of the prostate with Thulium: Yag laser (ES-ThuLEP) versus Thulium Fiber laser (ES-ThuFLEP): outcomes on sexual function.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY World Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s00345-025-05483-x
Davide Perri, Umberto Besana, Federica Mazzoleni, Andrea Pacchetti, Tommaso Calcagnile, Javier Romero-Otero, Jean-Baptiste Roche, Alexander Govorov, Dmitry Pushkar, Antonio Luigi Pastore, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Bernardo Rocco, Giorgio Bozzini
{"title":"Ejaculation-sparing enucleation of the prostate with Thulium: Yag laser (ES-ThuLEP) versus Thulium Fiber laser (ES-ThuFLEP): outcomes on sexual function.","authors":"Davide Perri, Umberto Besana, Federica Mazzoleni, Andrea Pacchetti, Tommaso Calcagnile, Javier Romero-Otero, Jean-Baptiste Roche, Alexander Govorov, Dmitry Pushkar, Antonio Luigi Pastore, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Bernardo Rocco, Giorgio Bozzini","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05483-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effect on sexual function of ejaculation-sparing enucleation of the prostate using Thulium: YAG laser (ES-ThuLEP) versus continuous-wave Thulium Fiber Laser (ES-ThuFLEP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>112 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia who wished to preserve ejaculation were treated. 58 patients underwent ES-ThuLEP (Group A) using the Cyber TM generator. 54 patients underwent ES-ThuFLEP (Group B) using the Fiber Dust generator. Sexual function was evaluated through the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) score, the four-item Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ-EjD), personal satisfaction and the occurrence of haemospermia and painful ejaculation 3 and 6 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of patients was 65.8 years in Group A and 66.7 years in Group B. Groups were comparable according to preoperative features. Mean preoperative IIEF-5 score was 18.8 in Group A and 17.9 in Group B (p = 0.14). In all cases an ejaculation-sparing procedure was performed sparing the tissue around the veru montanum and near the prostate apex. Three months after surgery mean IIEF-5 score was 19.3 in Group A and 18.0 in Group B (p = 0.12). Six months after surgery mean IIEF-5 score was 17.8 in Group A and 18.1 in Group B (p = 0.09). No significant differences were observed according to anterograde ejaculation (81.0% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.07), subjective satisfaction (72.4% vs. 74.1%, p = 0.10), painful ejaculation (10.3% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.14) and haemosparmia rate (12.1% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.08). Ejaculation and satisfaction rate were significantly higher with prostates ≥ 80 ml in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ejaculation-sparing enucleation of the prostate effectively preserved sexual function in the majority of patients, with high rate of anterograde ejaculation and subjective satisfaction, low rates of painful ejaculation and haemospermia and no significant differences between Thulium: YAG and Thulium Fiber Laser. Preservation of ejaculation and personal satisfaction were significantly higher with prostates ≥ 80 ml compared to smaller ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"92"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05483-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effect on sexual function of ejaculation-sparing enucleation of the prostate using Thulium: YAG laser (ES-ThuLEP) versus continuous-wave Thulium Fiber Laser (ES-ThuFLEP).

Methods: 112 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia who wished to preserve ejaculation were treated. 58 patients underwent ES-ThuLEP (Group A) using the Cyber TM generator. 54 patients underwent ES-ThuFLEP (Group B) using the Fiber Dust generator. Sexual function was evaluated through the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) score, the four-item Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ-EjD), personal satisfaction and the occurrence of haemospermia and painful ejaculation 3 and 6 months after surgery.

Results: Mean age of patients was 65.8 years in Group A and 66.7 years in Group B. Groups were comparable according to preoperative features. Mean preoperative IIEF-5 score was 18.8 in Group A and 17.9 in Group B (p = 0.14). In all cases an ejaculation-sparing procedure was performed sparing the tissue around the veru montanum and near the prostate apex. Three months after surgery mean IIEF-5 score was 19.3 in Group A and 18.0 in Group B (p = 0.12). Six months after surgery mean IIEF-5 score was 17.8 in Group A and 18.1 in Group B (p = 0.09). No significant differences were observed according to anterograde ejaculation (81.0% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.07), subjective satisfaction (72.4% vs. 74.1%, p = 0.10), painful ejaculation (10.3% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.14) and haemosparmia rate (12.1% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.08). Ejaculation and satisfaction rate were significantly higher with prostates ≥ 80 ml in both groups.

Conclusion: Ejaculation-sparing enucleation of the prostate effectively preserved sexual function in the majority of patients, with high rate of anterograde ejaculation and subjective satisfaction, low rates of painful ejaculation and haemospermia and no significant differences between Thulium: YAG and Thulium Fiber Laser. Preservation of ejaculation and personal satisfaction were significantly higher with prostates ≥ 80 ml compared to smaller ones.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用铥Yag激光(ES-ThuLEP)和铥光纤激光(ES-ThuFLEP)进行免射精的前列腺去核:对性功能的影响。
目的:比较连续波铥光纤激光(ES-ThuFLEP)和铥YAG激光(ES-ThuLEP)对保射精前列腺去核术对性功能的影响。方法:对112例希望保精的良性前列腺增生后下尿路症状患者进行治疗。58例患者采用赛博TM发生器行ES-ThuLEP (A组)。54例患者采用纤维粉尘发生器进行ES-ThuFLEP (B组)。通过国际勃起功能指数5 (IIEF-5)评分、四项男性性健康问卷(MSHQ-EjD)、个人满意度、术后3个月和6个月血精和射精痛的发生情况进行性功能评估。结果:A组患者平均年龄为65.8岁,b组患者平均年龄为66.7岁。A组术前IIEF-5平均评分为18.8分,B组术前平均评分为17.9分(p = 0.14)。在所有病例中,都进行了射精保护手术,保留了结节周围和前列腺尖附近的组织。术后3个月,A组IIEF-5平均评分为19.3分,B组为18.0分(p = 0.12)。术后6个月,A组IIEF-5平均评分为17.8分,B组为18.1分(p = 0.09)。在射精顺行(81.0%比81.5%,p = 0.07)、主观满意度(72.4%比74.1%,p = 0.10)、射精疼痛(10.3%比11.1%,p = 0.14)和血链球菌病发生率(12.1%比14.8%,p = 0.08)方面,两组间差异无统计学意义。前列腺≥80 ml组射精率和满意率均显著高于对照组。结论:免射精前列腺去核术能有效保护大部分患者的性功能,顺行射精率高,主观满意度高,射精痛和血精率低,且与铥光纤激光无显著性差异。≥80 ml的前列腺保存射精和个人满意度明显高于小于80 ml的前列腺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
期刊最新文献
Thermocautery for infantile circumcision in high-volume hospitals: a retrospective analysis of over 1,500 cases. A first-in-human pilot study of Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cell injection for urethral stricture: safety and preliminary efficacy. Unresolved questions in the sequencing of systemic therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Letter to the editor: Interpreting volume-stratified outcomes after ThuFLEP in very large prostates. Comparison of prostate cancer diagnostic models based on PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG RNA biomarkers from post-DRE and non-DRE urine specimens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1