Accuracy of a Novel High-Throughput "Car Blood Pressure" Measurement Protocol.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE American Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1093/ajh/hpaf016
Neiberg de Alcantara Lima, Shaun Cardozo, Andrew Johnson, Brian Reed, Steven Korzeniewski, Philip D Levy, Robert D Brook
{"title":"Accuracy of a Novel High-Throughput \"Car Blood Pressure\" Measurement Protocol.","authors":"Neiberg de Alcantara Lima, Shaun Cardozo, Andrew Johnson, Brian Reed, Steven Korzeniewski, Philip D Levy, Robert D Brook","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than one in three adults with hypertension in the United States are unaware of their condition, highlighting the importance of large-scale screening campaigns. Currently, the identification of hypertension is largely limited to medical settings. To help overcome this barrier, we developed a novel high-throughput screening protocol that measures blood pressure (BP) while patients remain seated in an automobile (\"car-BP\"). The aim of this study was to provide an initial assessment of the accuracy of car-BP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three BP readings were determined in a clinic exam room before and after three BP readings were taken while patients were seated in a parked car outside (n=100 participants). The same validated device model (Omron HEM-907XL) and BP measurement methods adhering to guidelines were used in both scenarios. The average of all 6 clinic readings was compared to the average of the 3 car-BP readings in each individual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean clinic and car-BP readings were 120.9 ± 16.2/78.0 ± 9.9 and 118.9 ± 15.2/76.0 ± 10.0 mm Hg, respectively. The paired mean and absolute mean differences in systolic BP levels between methods were -1.92 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.2 to -0.7 mm Hg) and 4.8 mm Hg (95%CI 3.8 to 5.6 mm Hg), respectively. A total of 85% of participants had both systolic and diastolic BP levels ≤10 mm Hg different between measurement scenarios (meeting the a priori determined study primary outcome).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Car-BP represents an innovative and accessible approach for potential large-scale hypertension screening campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: More than one in three adults with hypertension in the United States are unaware of their condition, highlighting the importance of large-scale screening campaigns. Currently, the identification of hypertension is largely limited to medical settings. To help overcome this barrier, we developed a novel high-throughput screening protocol that measures blood pressure (BP) while patients remain seated in an automobile ("car-BP"). The aim of this study was to provide an initial assessment of the accuracy of car-BP.

Methods: Three BP readings were determined in a clinic exam room before and after three BP readings were taken while patients were seated in a parked car outside (n=100 participants). The same validated device model (Omron HEM-907XL) and BP measurement methods adhering to guidelines were used in both scenarios. The average of all 6 clinic readings was compared to the average of the 3 car-BP readings in each individual.

Results: Mean clinic and car-BP readings were 120.9 ± 16.2/78.0 ± 9.9 and 118.9 ± 15.2/76.0 ± 10.0 mm Hg, respectively. The paired mean and absolute mean differences in systolic BP levels between methods were -1.92 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.2 to -0.7 mm Hg) and 4.8 mm Hg (95%CI 3.8 to 5.6 mm Hg), respectively. A total of 85% of participants had both systolic and diastolic BP levels ≤10 mm Hg different between measurement scenarios (meeting the a priori determined study primary outcome).

Conclusions: Car-BP represents an innovative and accessible approach for potential large-scale hypertension screening campaigns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic Related Healthcare Disruption on Hypertension Control: A Retrospective Analysis of Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions in New York City. Integrated Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis of Rat PASMCs Reveals the Underlying Mechanism for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Updated prevalence of hypertension subtypes in American adults, with implications for treating Isolated Systolic Hypertension. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Using Borderline High Office Blood Pressure Thresholds to Diagnose Masked Hypertension According to the 2017 American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline. PLK2 and the GSK3β-NRF2 Axis: A Promising Therapeutic Target for Sepsis-Induced Cardiac Injury?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1