Accuracy of a Novel High-Throughput "Car Blood Pressure" Measurement Protocol.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE American Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1093/ajh/hpaf016
Neiberg de Alcantara Lima, Shaun Cardozo, Andrew Johnson, Brian Reed, Steven Korzeniewski, Phillip D Levy, Robert D Brook
{"title":"Accuracy of a Novel High-Throughput \"Car Blood Pressure\" Measurement Protocol.","authors":"Neiberg de Alcantara Lima, Shaun Cardozo, Andrew Johnson, Brian Reed, Steven Korzeniewski, Phillip D Levy, Robert D Brook","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than one in three adults with hypertension in the United States are unaware of their condition, highlighting the importance of large-scale screening campaigns. Currently, the identification of hypertension is largely limited to medical settings. To help overcome this barrier, we developed a novel high-throughput screening protocol that measures blood pressure (BP) while patients remain seated in an automobile (\"car-BP\"). The aim of this study was to provide an initial assessment of the accuracy of car-BP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three BP readings were determined in a clinic exam room before and after three BP readings were taken while patients were seated in a parked car outside (n = 100 participants). The same validated device model (Omron HEM-907XL) and BP measurement methods adhering to guidelines were used in both scenarios. The average of all 6 clinic readings was compared to the average of the 3 car-BP readings in each individual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean clinic and car-BP readings were 120.9 ± 16.2/78.0 ± 9.9 and 118.9 ± 15.2/76.0 ± 10.0 mm Hg, respectively. The paired mean and absolute mean differences in systolic BP levels between methods were -1.92 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.2 to -0.7 mm Hg) and 4.8 mm Hg (95%CI 3.8 to 5.6 mm Hg), respectively. A total of 85% of participants had both systolic and diastolic BP levels ≤ 10 mm Hg different between measurement scenarios (meeting the a priori determined study primary outcome).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Car-BP represents an innovative and accessible approach for potential large-scale hypertension screening campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"534-536"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: More than one in three adults with hypertension in the United States are unaware of their condition, highlighting the importance of large-scale screening campaigns. Currently, the identification of hypertension is largely limited to medical settings. To help overcome this barrier, we developed a novel high-throughput screening protocol that measures blood pressure (BP) while patients remain seated in an automobile ("car-BP"). The aim of this study was to provide an initial assessment of the accuracy of car-BP.

Methods: Three BP readings were determined in a clinic exam room before and after three BP readings were taken while patients were seated in a parked car outside (n = 100 participants). The same validated device model (Omron HEM-907XL) and BP measurement methods adhering to guidelines were used in both scenarios. The average of all 6 clinic readings was compared to the average of the 3 car-BP readings in each individual.

Results: Mean clinic and car-BP readings were 120.9 ± 16.2/78.0 ± 9.9 and 118.9 ± 15.2/76.0 ± 10.0 mm Hg, respectively. The paired mean and absolute mean differences in systolic BP levels between methods were -1.92 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.2 to -0.7 mm Hg) and 4.8 mm Hg (95%CI 3.8 to 5.6 mm Hg), respectively. A total of 85% of participants had both systolic and diastolic BP levels ≤ 10 mm Hg different between measurement scenarios (meeting the a priori determined study primary outcome).

Conclusions: Car-BP represents an innovative and accessible approach for potential large-scale hypertension screening campaigns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新型高通量“汽车血压”测量方案的准确性。
背景:在美国,超过三分之一的成年高血压患者不知道自己的状况,这凸显了大规模筛查活动的重要性。目前,高血压的识别主要局限于医疗环境。为了帮助克服这一障碍,我们开发了一种新的高通量筛查方案,当患者坐在汽车中时测量血压(“car-BP”)。本研究的目的是对car-BP的准确性进行初步评估。方法:在临床检查室中,患者坐在停在外面的汽车上,在测量血压前后分别测量3次血压读数(n=100名参与者)。在两种情况下都使用了相同的经过验证的设备模型(欧姆龙HEM-907XL)和遵循指南的血压测量方法。将所有6个临床读数的平均值与每个个体3个car-BP读数的平均值进行比较。结果:临床和car-BP平均值分别为120.9±16.2/78.0±9.9和118.9±15.2/76.0±10.0 mm Hg。两种方法之间收缩压水平的配对平均值和绝对平均值差异分别为-1.92 mm Hg(95%可信区间(CI) -3.2至-0.7 mm Hg)和4.8 mm Hg(95%可信区间(CI) 3.8至5.6 mm Hg)。共有85%的参与者在不同的测量方案中收缩压和舒张压水平差异≤10毫米汞柱(符合先验确定的研究主要结果)。结论:Car-BP为潜在的大规模高血压筛查活动提供了一种创新和可获得的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
期刊最新文献
Reducing Clinical Inertia in Hypertension Through Primary Care Practitioner-Led Remote Patient Monitoring. Trends in Initial Combination Antihypertensive Therapy in a US Health System. Restless Legs, Relentless Pressure: The Non-Dipping Pattern in Restless Legs Syndrome Beyond Shared Comorbidities. Association of Non-Insulin-Based Markers of Insulin Resistance with Hypertension in Type 2 Diabetes: An Age- and Gender-Matched Cross-Sectional Study. Hypertension Medication Changes in Patients Prescribed Remote Monitoring.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1