Male sexual and reproductive health in cystic fibrosis: A concept mapping study.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Journal of Cystic Fibrosis Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jcf.2025.01.011
Kelly A Prangley, Olivia M Stransky, Jessica G Burke, Sigrid L Ladores, Kara S Hughan, Gregory S Sawicki, Traci M Kazmerski
{"title":"Male sexual and reproductive health in cystic fibrosis: A concept mapping study.","authors":"Kelly A Prangley, Olivia M Stransky, Jessica G Burke, Sigrid L Ladores, Kara S Hughan, Gregory S Sawicki, Traci M Kazmerski","doi":"10.1016/j.jcf.2025.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Males with cystic fibrosis (MwCF) face general and disease-specific sexual and reproductive health (SRH) concerns. Using concept mapping (CM), this study identified the SRH topics valued by members of the CF community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MwCF 18 years and older, parents and partners of MwCF, and healthcare providers participated in an online CM study. Participants individually brainstormed, sorted, and rated SRH topics important for MwCF. Using multidimensional scaling, hierarchical cluster analyses, and t tests to assess rating differences, participants interpreted results during an online meeting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-nine participants (32 MwCF; 6 parents; 9 partners; and 42 providers) generated 125 statements on male SRH in CF. Seventy-eight percent completed sorting and 73% rated statements based on importance. During interpretation, 20 participants named six clusters of SRH topics: 1) Family building and fertility; 2) Psychosocial aspects of SRH; 3) Being a parent or partner as a MwCF; 4) Sexual development, function, and treatments; 5) SRH education, communication, and awareness; and 6) SRH risks, comorbidities, and aging. Participants rated family building and fertility as highest in importance (mean = 4.06±0.36 of 5). Providers issued higher importance ratings compared to MwCF and parent/partner participants. Participants identified patient-centered outcomes for each cluster and focused on enhancing SRH knowledge, decision-making, and patient-provider communication in CF care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SRH topics, importance, and patient-centered outcomes identified in this study can inform future interventions and research to optimize the comprehensive clinical care delivery for MwCF.</p>","PeriodicalId":15452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2025.01.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Males with cystic fibrosis (MwCF) face general and disease-specific sexual and reproductive health (SRH) concerns. Using concept mapping (CM), this study identified the SRH topics valued by members of the CF community.

Methods: MwCF 18 years and older, parents and partners of MwCF, and healthcare providers participated in an online CM study. Participants individually brainstormed, sorted, and rated SRH topics important for MwCF. Using multidimensional scaling, hierarchical cluster analyses, and t tests to assess rating differences, participants interpreted results during an online meeting.

Results: Eighty-nine participants (32 MwCF; 6 parents; 9 partners; and 42 providers) generated 125 statements on male SRH in CF. Seventy-eight percent completed sorting and 73% rated statements based on importance. During interpretation, 20 participants named six clusters of SRH topics: 1) Family building and fertility; 2) Psychosocial aspects of SRH; 3) Being a parent or partner as a MwCF; 4) Sexual development, function, and treatments; 5) SRH education, communication, and awareness; and 6) SRH risks, comorbidities, and aging. Participants rated family building and fertility as highest in importance (mean = 4.06±0.36 of 5). Providers issued higher importance ratings compared to MwCF and parent/partner participants. Participants identified patient-centered outcomes for each cluster and focused on enhancing SRH knowledge, decision-making, and patient-provider communication in CF care.

Conclusions: The SRH topics, importance, and patient-centered outcomes identified in this study can inform future interventions and research to optimize the comprehensive clinical care delivery for MwCF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
1361
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cystic Fibrosis is the official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society. The journal is devoted to promoting the research and treatment of cystic fibrosis. To this end the journal publishes original scientific articles, editorials, case reports, short communications and other information relevant to cystic fibrosis. The journal also publishes news and articles concerning the activities and policies of the ECFS as well as those of other societies related the ECFS.
期刊最新文献
Impact of CFTR modulator therapy on basic life needs and financial concerns in people with cystic fibrosis: Data from the Well-ME survey. Tolerability and effectiveness of face-masks in reducing cough aerosols for children with cystic fibrosis. Male sexual and reproductive health in cystic fibrosis: A concept mapping study. Monitoring ETI effects over 1.7 years in an infant treated in utero, via breast milk and granules by repeated faecal elastase measurements. Pain in adults with cystic fibrosis - Are we painfully unaware?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1