Evaluation of recommended concentrations of eight insecticides for whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) control in the Republic of Korea

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Asia-pacific Entomology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1016/j.aspen.2025.102373
Sanghyeon Kim , Gyeongmo Gu , Donghun Kim
{"title":"Evaluation of recommended concentrations of eight insecticides for whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) control in the Republic of Korea","authors":"Sanghyeon Kim ,&nbsp;Gyeongmo Gu ,&nbsp;Donghun Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.aspen.2025.102373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since its introduction in 1998, <em>Bemisia tabaci</em> has become a major pest affecting greenhouse crops in the Republic of Korea. Insecticidal treatment remains the primary strategy for controlling <em>B. tabaci</em>. The initially introduced <em>B. tabaci</em> populations, identified as the B biotype, were susceptible to neonicotinoids and pyriproxyfen. However, the subsequent dominance of the Q biotype, coupled with the development of insecticide resistance, has necessitated a reassessment of insecticide concentrations. This study evaluated the efficacy of eight commercial insecticides with different modes of action against a laboratory strain (Q biotype) using a leaf-dip assay. The resistance index (RI), defined as the LC<sub>90</sub> value divided by the recommended concentration (RC), was employed to assess resistance levels. Four insecticides, pyridaben, milbemectin, spinetoram, and cyantraniliprole, were found to be effective, with RI values below 1. Spiromesifen and sulfoxaflor showed RI values of 1.7 and 5.6, respectively, indicating a need for alternative strategies to ensure effective field control. Notably, the laboratory strain, even after ten years without insecticide exposure, exhibited RI values of 23.8 and 51.3 for thiacloprid and pyriproxyfen, respectively, showing less than 50% control efficacy at 1x RC treatment. These findings underscore the inadequacy of current RCs for commercial products, which were originally established based on bioassays of the B biotype strain. To effectively manage <em>B. tabaci</em>, the RCs of commercial insecticides must be recalibrated based on the susceptible strain of the Q biotype, now the dominant biotype in Korea.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia-pacific Entomology","volume":"28 1","pages":"Article 102373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia-pacific Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1226861525000044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its introduction in 1998, Bemisia tabaci has become a major pest affecting greenhouse crops in the Republic of Korea. Insecticidal treatment remains the primary strategy for controlling B. tabaci. The initially introduced B. tabaci populations, identified as the B biotype, were susceptible to neonicotinoids and pyriproxyfen. However, the subsequent dominance of the Q biotype, coupled with the development of insecticide resistance, has necessitated a reassessment of insecticide concentrations. This study evaluated the efficacy of eight commercial insecticides with different modes of action against a laboratory strain (Q biotype) using a leaf-dip assay. The resistance index (RI), defined as the LC90 value divided by the recommended concentration (RC), was employed to assess resistance levels. Four insecticides, pyridaben, milbemectin, spinetoram, and cyantraniliprole, were found to be effective, with RI values below 1. Spiromesifen and sulfoxaflor showed RI values of 1.7 and 5.6, respectively, indicating a need for alternative strategies to ensure effective field control. Notably, the laboratory strain, even after ten years without insecticide exposure, exhibited RI values of 23.8 and 51.3 for thiacloprid and pyriproxyfen, respectively, showing less than 50% control efficacy at 1x RC treatment. These findings underscore the inadequacy of current RCs for commercial products, which were originally established based on bioassays of the B biotype strain. To effectively manage B. tabaci, the RCs of commercial insecticides must be recalibrated based on the susceptible strain of the Q biotype, now the dominant biotype in Korea.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asia-pacific Entomology
Journal of Asia-pacific Entomology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research papers, review articles and short communications in the basic and applied area concerning insects, mites or other arthropods and nematodes of economic importance in agriculture, forestry, industry, human and animal health, and natural resource and environment management, and is the official journal of the Korean Society of Applied Entomology and the Taiwan Entomological Society.
期刊最新文献
Molecular identification and functional analysis of the putative ecdysone receptor in Spodoptera litura The function of one type of Kazal-type serine protease inhibitor from Silkworms, Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera) Novel splice variants of the cytochrome P450 9A19 gene in the domestic silkworm Bombyx mori A remarkable new species of the genus Dichodontus Burmeister, 1847 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) from Thailand and Myanmar, with discussions on some Sundaic species Stethynium empoascae Subba Rao (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), a newly recorded egg parasitoid of Amrasca biguttula (Ishida) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), a pest of okra on Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands, Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1