Advancing an inclusive research approach in humanities and social sciences: The crucial role of self-study and narrative enquiry in doctoral research experiences

Social sciences & humanities open Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101256
Magdalena Kohout-Diaz
{"title":"Advancing an inclusive research approach in humanities and social sciences: The crucial role of self-study and narrative enquiry in doctoral research experiences","authors":"Magdalena Kohout-Diaz","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines the potential of self-study and narrative enquiry as inclusive research methodologies within the realm of higher education, with a particular emphasis on the doctoral experience. The lived experiences of individuals who have faced discrimination during their academic pursuits are illuminated through the analysis of two distinct case studies. The intersectionality of discrimination is emphasised, underscoring the necessity for higher education institutions to ensure equitable, and inclusive practices. A sustained effort to challenge and transform discriminatory practices and power dynamics is advocated, not only within the research process but also in the wider contexts where research is undertaken. This endeavour necessitates a profound comprehension of the intricate nuances inherent in the concept of inclusion, accompanied by a resolute dedication to acknowledging the distinctive requirements of each individual. The objective is to contribute to the ongoing discourse on inclusive research methodologies and provide a foundation for future research and initiatives aimed at fostering justice and ethical practices within higher educational institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 101256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291124004534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the potential of self-study and narrative enquiry as inclusive research methodologies within the realm of higher education, with a particular emphasis on the doctoral experience. The lived experiences of individuals who have faced discrimination during their academic pursuits are illuminated through the analysis of two distinct case studies. The intersectionality of discrimination is emphasised, underscoring the necessity for higher education institutions to ensure equitable, and inclusive practices. A sustained effort to challenge and transform discriminatory practices and power dynamics is advocated, not only within the research process but also in the wider contexts where research is undertaken. This endeavour necessitates a profound comprehension of the intricate nuances inherent in the concept of inclusion, accompanied by a resolute dedication to acknowledging the distinctive requirements of each individual. The objective is to contribute to the ongoing discourse on inclusive research methodologies and provide a foundation for future research and initiatives aimed at fostering justice and ethical practices within higher educational institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进人文和社会科学的包容性研究方法:自学和叙事探究在博士研究经历中的关键作用
本文探讨了自学和叙事探究作为高等教育领域内包容性研究方法的潜力,特别强调了博士经历。通过对两个不同案例的分析,揭示了在学术追求中遭受歧视的个人的生活经历。强调了歧视的交叉性,强调了高等教育机构确保公平和包容做法的必要性。不仅在研究过程中,而且在进行研究的更广泛的范围内,提倡持续努力挑战和改变歧视性做法和权力动态。这一努力需要深刻理解包容概念中固有的错综复杂的细微差别,同时坚定地致力于承认每个人的独特需求。其目标是促进正在进行的关于包容性研究方法的讨论,并为旨在促进高等教育机构内正义和道德实践的未来研究和倡议奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
期刊最新文献
Inflation trajectory in Ghana from dawn to dusk a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review Nurse workforce shortage and health system challenges in Bangladesh: A narrative review Comparative study of cultural heritage sustainability: A bibliometric analysis Mapping artificial-intelligence-driven innovation in higher education: A bibliometric review Social aspects of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven sustainability in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review with insights on labor market transformations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1