{"title":"Permission to archive: curating and contesting Palestinian history","authors":"Anne Irfan, Jo Kelcey","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09478-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The positioning of archives in relation to state power is characterized by an inherent tension. Archives buttress the authority of the state by institutionalizing and legitimizing preferred historical narratives. National archives exemplify this, as their management and accessibility is determined by state legislation. Yet archives can also threaten state power by enabling counter-histories that dispute and undermine official narratives. We explore this tension here in relation to the Palestinian case. Palestinians have long been at the forefront of archival contestation, curating grass roots archives to provide alternatives to the state collections that exclude them, while challenging conventional ideas of what comprises an archive. In so doing, they have utilized the power derived from archives’ implicit legitimacy. By seeking to bestow this legitimacy on different ideas of “the archive,” Palestinians act upon the latter’s potential power: Whoever owns the archives can own the past, and whoever owns the past owns the present. Drawing on Mbembe’s theory of necropolitics, we examine how the creation, capture and treatment of Palestinian archives by various actors fit within the postcolonial archival terrain. In so doing we argue that contestations over Palestinian history show how archival power can come about not only by curating alternative collections, but also by challenging the very concept of an archive itself.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09478-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The positioning of archives in relation to state power is characterized by an inherent tension. Archives buttress the authority of the state by institutionalizing and legitimizing preferred historical narratives. National archives exemplify this, as their management and accessibility is determined by state legislation. Yet archives can also threaten state power by enabling counter-histories that dispute and undermine official narratives. We explore this tension here in relation to the Palestinian case. Palestinians have long been at the forefront of archival contestation, curating grass roots archives to provide alternatives to the state collections that exclude them, while challenging conventional ideas of what comprises an archive. In so doing, they have utilized the power derived from archives’ implicit legitimacy. By seeking to bestow this legitimacy on different ideas of “the archive,” Palestinians act upon the latter’s potential power: Whoever owns the archives can own the past, and whoever owns the past owns the present. Drawing on Mbembe’s theory of necropolitics, we examine how the creation, capture and treatment of Palestinian archives by various actors fit within the postcolonial archival terrain. In so doing we argue that contestations over Palestinian history show how archival power can come about not only by curating alternative collections, but also by challenging the very concept of an archive itself.
期刊介绍：
Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
