Right-sided vagus nerve stimulation: Worldwide collection and perspectives

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1002/acn3.52312
Marc Zanello, Berthold Voges, Ramesh Chelvarajah, Arjune Sen, Željka Petelin Gadže, Guillaume Penchet, Alessandro De Benedictis, Riccardo Fornaro, Masaki Iwasaki, Keiya Iijima, Elena Jiltsova, Goran Mrak, Sami Barrit, Alessandro Moiraghi, Andrea Landi, Marcus Neale, Shailendra Magdum, François Caire, Bertrand Godet, Philippe Domenech, Raphael Gaillard, Marc Guenot, Jason Labuschagne, Alexandre Rainha Campos, Herbert Rooijakkers, Riëm El Tahry, Tatiana Von Hertwig Fernandes De Oliveira, Amelia Alvarez-Sala, Cristina V. Torres, Fernando Vale, Johan Pallud, Romain Carron
{"title":"Right-sided vagus nerve stimulation: Worldwide collection and perspectives","authors":"Marc Zanello,&nbsp;Berthold Voges,&nbsp;Ramesh Chelvarajah,&nbsp;Arjune Sen,&nbsp;Željka Petelin Gadže,&nbsp;Guillaume Penchet,&nbsp;Alessandro De Benedictis,&nbsp;Riccardo Fornaro,&nbsp;Masaki Iwasaki,&nbsp;Keiya Iijima,&nbsp;Elena Jiltsova,&nbsp;Goran Mrak,&nbsp;Sami Barrit,&nbsp;Alessandro Moiraghi,&nbsp;Andrea Landi,&nbsp;Marcus Neale,&nbsp;Shailendra Magdum,&nbsp;François Caire,&nbsp;Bertrand Godet,&nbsp;Philippe Domenech,&nbsp;Raphael Gaillard,&nbsp;Marc Guenot,&nbsp;Jason Labuschagne,&nbsp;Alexandre Rainha Campos,&nbsp;Herbert Rooijakkers,&nbsp;Riëm El Tahry,&nbsp;Tatiana Von Hertwig Fernandes De Oliveira,&nbsp;Amelia Alvarez-Sala,&nbsp;Cristina V. Torres,&nbsp;Fernando Vale,&nbsp;Johan Pallud,&nbsp;Romain Carron","doi":"10.1002/acn3.52312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and is indicated for implantation on the left vagus nerve-only. In rare cases right-sided VNS may be the only option. With only seven published cases in the literature, data on safety and effectiveness of right-sided VNS is very limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An anonymous 38-item questionnaire was sent to expert surgeons implanting VNS for DRE. The questions covered demographics and clinical characteristics, the reason for right-sided implantation and both neurological and surgical outcomes of right-sided VNS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The survey captured 38 cases of right-sided VNS (18 females, mean age at surgery of 28.0 ± 16.3 years). Right-sided VNS was performed because of VNS lead deficiency (<i>n</i> = 20), anatomical constraints (<i>n</i> = 8), infection of a left-sided VNS site (<i>n</i> = 9), and presence of a left ventricular shunt (<i>n</i> = 1). Thirty-two patients (84%) had a preoperative cardiac assessment. Three patients presented postoperative cardiac side-effects. Right-sided VNS was stopped at last follow-up in three patients: due to deep infection (<i>n</i> = 1), due to dyspnea (<i>n</i> = 1), and due to sleep apnea syndrome (<i>n</i> = 1). Twenty-one patients (55%) were responders to right-sided VNS and the mean reduction of seizure frequency under right-sided VNS was 56.2 ± 18.8%. Focusing on seizure frequency reduction between right-sided VNS and left-sided VNS: 20 patients experienced similar effectiveness, 1 experienced lesser effectiveness, and 2 patients experienced greater effectiveness with right-sided VNS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>This multicenter case series significantly augments the available literature on right-sided VNS. This suggests comparable effectiveness to left-sided VNS but potentially lower tolerability. Further studies are warranted to better evaluate safety and efficacy of right-sided VNS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":"12 3","pages":"565-576"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52312","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.52312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and is indicated for implantation on the left vagus nerve-only. In rare cases right-sided VNS may be the only option. With only seven published cases in the literature, data on safety and effectiveness of right-sided VNS is very limited.

Methods

An anonymous 38-item questionnaire was sent to expert surgeons implanting VNS for DRE. The questions covered demographics and clinical characteristics, the reason for right-sided implantation and both neurological and surgical outcomes of right-sided VNS.

Results

The survey captured 38 cases of right-sided VNS (18 females, mean age at surgery of 28.0 ± 16.3 years). Right-sided VNS was performed because of VNS lead deficiency (n = 20), anatomical constraints (n = 8), infection of a left-sided VNS site (n = 9), and presence of a left ventricular shunt (n = 1). Thirty-two patients (84%) had a preoperative cardiac assessment. Three patients presented postoperative cardiac side-effects. Right-sided VNS was stopped at last follow-up in three patients: due to deep infection (n = 1), due to dyspnea (n = 1), and due to sleep apnea syndrome (n = 1). Twenty-one patients (55%) were responders to right-sided VNS and the mean reduction of seizure frequency under right-sided VNS was 56.2 ± 18.8%. Focusing on seizure frequency reduction between right-sided VNS and left-sided VNS: 20 patients experienced similar effectiveness, 1 experienced lesser effectiveness, and 2 patients experienced greater effectiveness with right-sided VNS.

Interpretation

This multicenter case series significantly augments the available literature on right-sided VNS. This suggests comparable effectiveness to left-sided VNS but potentially lower tolerability. Further studies are warranted to better evaluate safety and efficacy of right-sided VNS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
期刊最新文献
Combination Therapy With Vigabatrin and Prednisolone Versus Vigabatrin Alone for Infantile Spasms. Abnormal Synchronization Between Cortical Delta Power and Ripples in Hippocampal Sclerosis. Universal Proteomic Signature After Exercise-Induced Muscle Injury in Muscular Dystrophies. Issue Information Development of a Disease Model for Predicting Postoperative Delirium Using Combined Blood Biomarkers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1