In Vitro Drug Release and Ex Vivo Dermal Drug Permeation Studies of Selected Commercial Benzoyl Peroxide Topical Formulations: Correlation Between Human and Porcine Skin Models.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Molecular Pharmaceutics Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c01058
Murilo de Souza Brighenti, Lilian Rosário da Silva Montanheri, Marcelo Dutra Duque, Newton Andreo-Filho, Patricia Santos Lopes, Maria Teresa Junqueira Garcia, Lorraine Mackenzie, Vânia Rodrigues Leite-Silva
{"title":"<i>In Vitro</i> Drug Release and <i>Ex Vivo</i> Dermal Drug Permeation Studies of Selected Commercial Benzoyl Peroxide Topical Formulations: Correlation Between Human and Porcine Skin Models.","authors":"Murilo de Souza Brighenti, Lilian Rosário da Silva Montanheri, Marcelo Dutra Duque, Newton Andreo-Filho, Patricia Santos Lopes, Maria Teresa Junqueira Garcia, Lorraine Mackenzie, Vânia Rodrigues Leite-Silva","doi":"10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c01058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>In vitro</i> release testing (IVRT) serves as a crucial tool to assess the quality, physicochemical behavior, and performance of semisolid formulations already available on the market. <i>In vitro</i> skin permeation studies (IVPT) are widely used to evaluate the safety and efficacy profiles of topical drugs, utilizing biological membranes prepared from <i>ex vivo</i> human and porcine skin tissues. This study aimed to develop and validate a discriminative IVRT method to evaluate various marketed topical benzoyl peroxide formulations. Additionally, IVPT was employed to assess skin permeation and retention profiles of these formulations, comparing porcine skin results with those obtained by using <i>ex vivo</i> human skin tissues. Physicochemical differences among the evaluated benzoyl peroxide formulations were identified, with the poloxamer-based formulation exhibiting a higher release rate. IVPT using both porcine and human skin differentiated retention and skin permeation profiles, with the poloxamer-based formulation demonstrating greater skin retention capacity compared to the other formulations evaluated. Similar conclusions on benzoyl peroxide retention and cutaneous permeation were drawn from both porcine and human skin IVPT tests, confirming the correlation between the two models.</p>","PeriodicalId":52,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Pharmaceutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c01058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vitro release testing (IVRT) serves as a crucial tool to assess the quality, physicochemical behavior, and performance of semisolid formulations already available on the market. In vitro skin permeation studies (IVPT) are widely used to evaluate the safety and efficacy profiles of topical drugs, utilizing biological membranes prepared from ex vivo human and porcine skin tissues. This study aimed to develop and validate a discriminative IVRT method to evaluate various marketed topical benzoyl peroxide formulations. Additionally, IVPT was employed to assess skin permeation and retention profiles of these formulations, comparing porcine skin results with those obtained by using ex vivo human skin tissues. Physicochemical differences among the evaluated benzoyl peroxide formulations were identified, with the poloxamer-based formulation exhibiting a higher release rate. IVPT using both porcine and human skin differentiated retention and skin permeation profiles, with the poloxamer-based formulation demonstrating greater skin retention capacity compared to the other formulations evaluated. Similar conclusions on benzoyl peroxide retention and cutaneous permeation were drawn from both porcine and human skin IVPT tests, confirming the correlation between the two models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Molecular Pharmaceutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
391
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Pharmaceutics publishes the results of original research that contributes significantly to the molecular mechanistic understanding of drug delivery and drug delivery systems. The journal encourages contributions describing research at the interface of drug discovery and drug development. Scientific areas within the scope of the journal include physical and pharmaceutical chemistry, biochemistry and biophysics, molecular and cellular biology, and polymer and materials science as they relate to drug and drug delivery system efficacy. Mechanistic Drug Delivery and Drug Targeting research on modulating activity and efficacy of a drug or drug product is within the scope of Molecular Pharmaceutics. Theoretical and experimental peer-reviewed research articles, communications, reviews, and perspectives are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Development and Evaluation of 68Ga-Labeled TMTP1-Based Cyclic Peptide Probes for Targeting Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Monitoring Sorafenib Resistance and Efficacy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using [18F]Alfatide II and [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography. Chitosan-Coated Silver Nanourchins for Imatinib Mesylate Delivery: Biophysical Characterization, In-Silico Profiling, and Anti-Colon Cancer Efficacy. Meta-Analysis of Permeability Literature Data Shows Possibilities and Limitations of Popular Methods. Mucin Mimics and Impacts the Function of Polymeric Inhibitors in Stabilizing Drug Supersaturation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1