Multiple dimensions of workplace curiosity: Evidence of generalizability in nine countries

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.113011
Todd B. Kashdan , Patrick E. McKnight , Kerry Kelso , Logan Craig , Bushra Guenoun , Carl Naughton
{"title":"Multiple dimensions of workplace curiosity: Evidence of generalizability in nine countries","authors":"Todd B. Kashdan ,&nbsp;Patrick E. McKnight ,&nbsp;Kerry Kelso ,&nbsp;Logan Craig ,&nbsp;Bushra Guenoun ,&nbsp;Carl Naughton","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.113011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Curiosity is a fundamental human motive that is gaining increasing attention by researchers and practitioners interested in workplace functioning. Recent research suggests rather than designating someone as curious or not, there is benefit in detailing frequency/intensity scores on multiple dimensions. In this multi-national study, we examined how four workplace curiosity dimensions (Joyous Exploration, Deprivation Sensitivity, Stress Tolerance, and Openness to People's Ideas) operate with employees (adults aged 19 to over 55) working in nine countries. Our results include nine (from 23) countries with sufficient sample sizes (<em>N</em> &gt; 250) to estimate stable correlations (Perugini, Gallucci, &amp; Costantini, 2014): Germany, USA, China, France, India, Italy, Taiwan, Brazil, and Mexico. In an attempt to improve the psychometrics and minimize respondent burden, we found support for removing a single item per subscale. We also found evidence that the four-factor structure of curiosity showed generalizability across different geographical locations, age ranges, and biological sex. We detail the comparative psychometrics of this new, briefer version of the M-Workplace Curiosity Scale. Our approach offers a template for cross-cultural measurement approaches — giving adequate focus to measurement invariance as a method of assessing generalizability. Scientists cannot assume generalizability; it must be tested to understand whether, how, and when psychological strengths such as curiosity operate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 113011"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Curiosity is a fundamental human motive that is gaining increasing attention by researchers and practitioners interested in workplace functioning. Recent research suggests rather than designating someone as curious or not, there is benefit in detailing frequency/intensity scores on multiple dimensions. In this multi-national study, we examined how four workplace curiosity dimensions (Joyous Exploration, Deprivation Sensitivity, Stress Tolerance, and Openness to People's Ideas) operate with employees (adults aged 19 to over 55) working in nine countries. Our results include nine (from 23) countries with sufficient sample sizes (N > 250) to estimate stable correlations (Perugini, Gallucci, & Costantini, 2014): Germany, USA, China, France, India, Italy, Taiwan, Brazil, and Mexico. In an attempt to improve the psychometrics and minimize respondent burden, we found support for removing a single item per subscale. We also found evidence that the four-factor structure of curiosity showed generalizability across different geographical locations, age ranges, and biological sex. We detail the comparative psychometrics of this new, briefer version of the M-Workplace Curiosity Scale. Our approach offers a template for cross-cultural measurement approaches — giving adequate focus to measurement invariance as a method of assessing generalizability. Scientists cannot assume generalizability; it must be tested to understand whether, how, and when psychological strengths such as curiosity operate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Boys are smart (and really dull and pretty average): Testing replication and validity of the Brilliance Stereotype The impact of perfectionism profiles on perceived academic achievement, self-compassion, and wellbeing among undergraduate students in New Zealand From self-interest to group interest: Machiavellianism fuels intergroup bias depending on ingroup identification Genetic origins of Utilitarian versus Kantian moral philosophy in heritable motivations for egalitarian beneficence and coercive redistribution Catching up or putting them down? An investigation of employee divergent reactions to coworker conscientiousness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1