Evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas and community-managed lands in capturing multiple dimensions of frugivorous biodiversity in the Tropical Andes

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110904
Beth E. Gerstner , Phoebe L. Zarnetske
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas and community-managed lands in capturing multiple dimensions of frugivorous biodiversity in the Tropical Andes","authors":"Beth E. Gerstner ,&nbsp;Phoebe L. Zarnetske","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Tropical Andes, known for its rich biodiversity, faces threats like habitat loss and climate change, making conservation in these areas crucial. Traditional conservation efforts often focus on taxonomic diversity (TD), overlooking functional diversity (FD), which is vital for ecosystem health. Understanding the role of community-managed lands in biodiversity protection is also essential for achieving conservation goals. This study used the <em>Frugivoria</em> trait database to assess FD of frugivorous birds and mammals in the Tropical Andes, species critical for seed dispersal and forest health. We analyzed the spatial alignment and mismatch between TD and FD in high diversity areas and evaluated the spatial distribution of Functionally Unique, Specialized, and Endangered (FUSE) species, which have irreplaceable functional roles. Our findings reveal spatial discrepancies between FD and TD, highlighting the limitations of relying solely on TD for conservation. Additionally, we examined biodiversity levels in strict and less strict protected areas (PAs), finding that strict PAs do not always contain higher biodiversity levels than less strict ones. Some strict PAs better represent FUSE species distributions, but many areas with more FUSE species and higher TD remain unprotected. Notably, community-managed lands exhibited higher FD than other PAs in the same IUCN PA category, underscoring the importance of Indigenous Lands and community-managed areas in protecting FD. As global conservation aims to protect 30 % of Earth's land by 2030, our findings emphasize the need to incorporate multiple biodiversity dimensions and utilize other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) for effective and sustainable conservation in the Tropical Andes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"302 ","pages":"Article 110904"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632072400466X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Tropical Andes, known for its rich biodiversity, faces threats like habitat loss and climate change, making conservation in these areas crucial. Traditional conservation efforts often focus on taxonomic diversity (TD), overlooking functional diversity (FD), which is vital for ecosystem health. Understanding the role of community-managed lands in biodiversity protection is also essential for achieving conservation goals. This study used the Frugivoria trait database to assess FD of frugivorous birds and mammals in the Tropical Andes, species critical for seed dispersal and forest health. We analyzed the spatial alignment and mismatch between TD and FD in high diversity areas and evaluated the spatial distribution of Functionally Unique, Specialized, and Endangered (FUSE) species, which have irreplaceable functional roles. Our findings reveal spatial discrepancies between FD and TD, highlighting the limitations of relying solely on TD for conservation. Additionally, we examined biodiversity levels in strict and less strict protected areas (PAs), finding that strict PAs do not always contain higher biodiversity levels than less strict ones. Some strict PAs better represent FUSE species distributions, but many areas with more FUSE species and higher TD remain unprotected. Notably, community-managed lands exhibited higher FD than other PAs in the same IUCN PA category, underscoring the importance of Indigenous Lands and community-managed areas in protecting FD. As global conservation aims to protect 30 % of Earth's land by 2030, our findings emphasize the need to incorporate multiple biodiversity dimensions and utilize other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) for effective and sustainable conservation in the Tropical Andes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
How much deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa has been caused by mining? Conservation translocation immediately reverses decline in imperiled sage-grouse populations Prevalence of endangered shark trophies in automated detection of the online wildlife trade Jaguar (Panthera onca) density and population size across protected areas and indigenous lands in the Amazon biome, its largest stronghold Bias in neotropical and reef biodiversity monitoring programs may prevent detecting changes in species diversity through time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1