Assessing the sustainable performance of the transport sector in European countries using alternative Benefit-of-the-Doubt models

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.trip.2025.101326
Sarah B. Gruetzmacher , Clara B. Vaz , Ângela P. Ferreira
{"title":"Assessing the sustainable performance of the transport sector in European countries using alternative Benefit-of-the-Doubt models","authors":"Sarah B. Gruetzmacher ,&nbsp;Clara B. Vaz ,&nbsp;Ângela P. Ferreira","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The energy policy of the European Union stresses the need for sustainable energy consumption, improvements in energy efficiency and lower fossil fuel dependence in a decoupling strategy from unstable democracies. Transportation still represents a sector largely dependent on fossil fuels, which come with several negative impacts. Measuring and assessing the sustainability of the transport sector becomes necessary. This study aims to assess the sustainability performance of the transport sector across 28 European countries over a four-year period, aligned with the policy agenda outlined in strategic documents. The methodological approach involves applying Benefit-of-the-Doubt (BoD) models, comparing a version that uses transformation methods for anti-isotonic sub-indicators with a variant that directly incorporates these sub-indicators as reverse indicators. In general, the European countries have improved the sustainability performance of their transport sector during the time span analyzed according to the results of both models. For the inefficient units, two improvement strategies are presented based on the profiles identified on the benchmarks from both models, which can be alternative stages to achieve the robust best practices of the benchmarks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225000053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The energy policy of the European Union stresses the need for sustainable energy consumption, improvements in energy efficiency and lower fossil fuel dependence in a decoupling strategy from unstable democracies. Transportation still represents a sector largely dependent on fossil fuels, which come with several negative impacts. Measuring and assessing the sustainability of the transport sector becomes necessary. This study aims to assess the sustainability performance of the transport sector across 28 European countries over a four-year period, aligned with the policy agenda outlined in strategic documents. The methodological approach involves applying Benefit-of-the-Doubt (BoD) models, comparing a version that uses transformation methods for anti-isotonic sub-indicators with a variant that directly incorporates these sub-indicators as reverse indicators. In general, the European countries have improved the sustainability performance of their transport sector during the time span analyzed according to the results of both models. For the inefficient units, two improvement strategies are presented based on the profiles identified on the benchmarks from both models, which can be alternative stages to achieve the robust best practices of the benchmarks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估欧洲国家运输部门的可持续绩效,使用替代的怀疑利益模型
欧洲联盟的能源政策强调,在与不稳定的民主国家脱钩的战略中,需要可持续的能源消费、提高能源效率和降低对化石燃料的依赖。交通运输仍然是一个很大程度上依赖化石燃料的部门,这带来了一些负面影响。衡量和评估运输部门的可持续性是必要的。本研究旨在根据战略文件中概述的政策议程,评估28个欧洲国家运输部门在四年期间的可持续性表现。方法方法包括应用怀疑受益(BoD)模型,将使用反等压子指标转换方法的版本与直接将这些子指标作为反向指标的变体进行比较。总的来说,根据这两种模型的结果分析的时间跨度内,欧洲国家改善了其运输部门的可持续性绩效。对于效率低下的单元,基于两个模型在基准测试中确定的概要文件,提出了两种改进策略,这可以作为实现基准测试健壮性最佳实践的替代阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Children’s transport mode choice for active school trips in Switzerland: An exploratory approach using national census data Variety seeking route choice behavior of commuting e-cyclists retrieved from GPS data Parallel agent-based modeling for improving traffic flow simulation Environmental governance in railway megaprojects: a stakeholder framework and validated empirical model Open-source data enhancement for smarter pedestrian navigation systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1