A systematic review of antecedents of workers’ safety behavior: A grounded theory analysis

IF 5.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Safety Science Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106778
Suxia Liu, Yueyue Wei, Daojian Yang, Jingjing Zhang
{"title":"A systematic review of antecedents of workers’ safety behavior: A grounded theory analysis","authors":"Suxia Liu,&nbsp;Yueyue Wei,&nbsp;Daojian Yang,&nbsp;Jingjing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a key contributor of workplace safety, workers’ safety behavior remains a focal point for both enterprises and society. While numerous studies have covered a wide range of topics related to the antecedents of workers’ safety behavior, a cohesive system has yet to be established. Therefore, a comprehensive review and categorization of the antecedents is necessary for the academic community. Consequently, this study first thoroughly defines and systematizes the dimensions of safety behavior. Then, utilizing grounded theory, 230 articles from key journals were screened, resulting in the identification of 17 core categories of antecedents related to workers’ safety behavior, spanning individual, managerial, enterprise and work situation levels. A comprehensive framework of antecedents of workers’ safety behavior was constructed by analyzing the relationships among these core categories. The research results offer practitioners a theoretical framework and practical guidance to improve workers’ safety behavior through policy formulation and behavioral decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 106778"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753525000037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a key contributor of workplace safety, workers’ safety behavior remains a focal point for both enterprises and society. While numerous studies have covered a wide range of topics related to the antecedents of workers’ safety behavior, a cohesive system has yet to be established. Therefore, a comprehensive review and categorization of the antecedents is necessary for the academic community. Consequently, this study first thoroughly defines and systematizes the dimensions of safety behavior. Then, utilizing grounded theory, 230 articles from key journals were screened, resulting in the identification of 17 core categories of antecedents related to workers’ safety behavior, spanning individual, managerial, enterprise and work situation levels. A comprehensive framework of antecedents of workers’ safety behavior was constructed by analyzing the relationships among these core categories. The research results offer practitioners a theoretical framework and practical guidance to improve workers’ safety behavior through policy formulation and behavioral decision-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工人安全行为前因的系统回顾:一个扎根的理论分析
作为安全生产的关键贡献者,工人的安全行为一直是企业和社会关注的焦点。尽管大量的研究已经涵盖了与工人安全行为前因相关的广泛主题,但尚未建立一个连贯的系统。因此,学术界有必要对先行词进行全面的梳理和分类。因此,本研究首先对安全行为的维度进行了彻底的定义和系统化。然后,运用扎根理论对230篇重点期刊文章进行筛选,最终确定了17个与工人安全行为相关的核心前因类别,涵盖个人、管理、企业和工作情境层面。通过分析这些核心类别之间的关系,构建了一个全面的工人安全行为前因框架。研究结果为从业者通过政策制定和行为决策改善工人安全行为提供了理论框架和实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Generative adaptive resilience: LLM-MILP modeling and strategy generation for port vessel scheduling Applications of artificial intelligence in the detection and prevention of assaults against healthcare Staff: A systematic review Case-Based Reasoning Augmented Large Language Model Framework for Decision Making in Realistic Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios Electric motorcycle crash severity: a random parameters logit model considering interaction effects and counterfactual policy evaluation A mixed-methods study of multi-stakeholder perspectives in high-rise residential building evacuations in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1