Recommendations for standard criteria for the positional and morphological evaluation of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osseous structures: a systematic review
Prof. Abeer Almashraqi , Dr. Boshra Sayed , Dr. Lujain Mokli , Dr. Sarah Jaafari , Prof. Esam Halboub , Prof. Maged Alhammadi
{"title":"Recommendations for standard criteria for the positional and morphological evaluation of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osseous structures: a systematic review","authors":"Prof. Abeer Almashraqi , Dr. Boshra Sayed , Dr. Lujain Mokli , Dr. Sarah Jaafari , Prof. Esam Halboub , Prof. Maged Alhammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review aimed to appraise the reliability and comprehensiveness of imaging methods in articles that used three-dimensional assessment of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), which used either computed tomography (CT) or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), in order to propose a standardized imaging method.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Six databases/search engines were searched up until September 2022. The outcomes of interest included measurements of the mandibular condyle, glenoid fossa, joint spaces, or the entire TMJ. Two checklists were used: one to assess the risk of bias, with a maximum score of 37, and the other, a predesigned checklist consisting of 22 items to evaluate the comprehensiveness of the methods used, with a maximum score of 33.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 2567 articles retrieved, only 14 studies (which used CBCT) were deemed eligible and thus included in the qualitative analysis. Three studies were deemed of low risk of bias (with scores of 29/37 in two studies and 28/37 in one study), while the remaining studies were rated as high to moderate quality, primarily due to improper reporting of inter-observer agreement, varying reliability values, and a limited number of cases included in the reliability analysis. Regarding the comprehensiveness of the methods used, only 4 studies achieved relatively high scores (26/33 in three studies and 24/33 in one study). The deficiencies observed were related to the reporting of variables such as slice thickness and voxel size, absence of or improper reporting of intra- and inter-examiner reliability analyses, and failure to assess all osseous components of the TMJ.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CBCT-based methods used to assess the positions and morphology of TMJ bony structures appear to be imperfect and lacking in comprehensiveness. Hence, criteria for a standardized assessment method of these TMJ structures are proposed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":"139 3","pages":"Page e82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324008320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This systematic review aimed to appraise the reliability and comprehensiveness of imaging methods in articles that used three-dimensional assessment of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), which used either computed tomography (CT) or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), in order to propose a standardized imaging method.
Study Design
Six databases/search engines were searched up until September 2022. The outcomes of interest included measurements of the mandibular condyle, glenoid fossa, joint spaces, or the entire TMJ. Two checklists were used: one to assess the risk of bias, with a maximum score of 37, and the other, a predesigned checklist consisting of 22 items to evaluate the comprehensiveness of the methods used, with a maximum score of 33.
Results
Of the 2567 articles retrieved, only 14 studies (which used CBCT) were deemed eligible and thus included in the qualitative analysis. Three studies were deemed of low risk of bias (with scores of 29/37 in two studies and 28/37 in one study), while the remaining studies were rated as high to moderate quality, primarily due to improper reporting of inter-observer agreement, varying reliability values, and a limited number of cases included in the reliability analysis. Regarding the comprehensiveness of the methods used, only 4 studies achieved relatively high scores (26/33 in three studies and 24/33 in one study). The deficiencies observed were related to the reporting of variables such as slice thickness and voxel size, absence of or improper reporting of intra- and inter-examiner reliability analyses, and failure to assess all osseous components of the TMJ.
Conclusion
CBCT-based methods used to assess the positions and morphology of TMJ bony structures appear to be imperfect and lacking in comprehensiveness. Hence, criteria for a standardized assessment method of these TMJ structures are proposed.
期刊介绍:
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.