Assessing farm-level agricultural sustainability in India: A comparative study using a mixed-method approach

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104223
Niloofar Abed , Masoud Barati Kakolaki , Maneesha Vinodini Ramesh , Sabarinath Sankarannair , Ramu Murugan , Bankaru Swamy Soundharajan , Raji Pushpalatha
{"title":"Assessing farm-level agricultural sustainability in India: A comparative study using a mixed-method approach","authors":"Niloofar Abed ,&nbsp;Masoud Barati Kakolaki ,&nbsp;Maneesha Vinodini Ramesh ,&nbsp;Sabarinath Sankarannair ,&nbsp;Ramu Murugan ,&nbsp;Bankaru Swamy Soundharajan ,&nbsp;Raji Pushpalatha","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Agricultural sustainability in rural India is vital for ensuring food security and livelihoods, particularly for small-scale farmers. Many rural communities exhibit a blend of sustainable and unsustainable farming practices, affecting both their agricultural productivity and resilience in the face of environmental and socio-economic challenges.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the sustainability of agricultural practices within rural farming communities. The goal is to identify weaknesses in resource management and productivity while proposing targeted interventions that promote sustainable practices in line with Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 2.4.1.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>A mixed-method approach was adopted, integrating both quantitative and qualitative data through surveys, interviews, and sub-indicators of sustainability. The research modified the FAO methodology for assessing agricultural sustainability and tailored it to local conditions. The Saiful participatory framework was further adapted to ensure stakeholder participation and the inclusion of culturally relevant practices. A visualized indicator framework was also developed to track sustainability progress effectively.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Key findings reveal that while these communities exhibit potential for improved sustainability, critical weaknesses in resource management and land use hinder productivity. The study also highlighted positive elements, such as community-driven initiatives that enhance sustainable practices. The sub-indicator analysis identified priority areas for intervention, and the visualized framework provides a practical tool for monitoring farm-level sustainability. Results suggest the need for region-specific policies to address the unique challenges faced by rural communities.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study contributes to the assessment of agricultural sustainability by developing a locally adapted framework that can be applied across various rural settings. The findings provide insights for policymakers, agronomists, and rural development practitioners, emphasizing the importance of engaging local stakeholders and fostering sustainable practices that align with national and global sustainability goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 104223"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24003731","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

Agricultural sustainability in rural India is vital for ensuring food security and livelihoods, particularly for small-scale farmers. Many rural communities exhibit a blend of sustainable and unsustainable farming practices, affecting both their agricultural productivity and resilience in the face of environmental and socio-economic challenges.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the sustainability of agricultural practices within rural farming communities. The goal is to identify weaknesses in resource management and productivity while proposing targeted interventions that promote sustainable practices in line with Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 2.4.1.

METHODS

A mixed-method approach was adopted, integrating both quantitative and qualitative data through surveys, interviews, and sub-indicators of sustainability. The research modified the FAO methodology for assessing agricultural sustainability and tailored it to local conditions. The Saiful participatory framework was further adapted to ensure stakeholder participation and the inclusion of culturally relevant practices. A visualized indicator framework was also developed to track sustainability progress effectively.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Key findings reveal that while these communities exhibit potential for improved sustainability, critical weaknesses in resource management and land use hinder productivity. The study also highlighted positive elements, such as community-driven initiatives that enhance sustainable practices. The sub-indicator analysis identified priority areas for intervention, and the visualized framework provides a practical tool for monitoring farm-level sustainability. Results suggest the need for region-specific policies to address the unique challenges faced by rural communities.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study contributes to the assessment of agricultural sustainability by developing a locally adapted framework that can be applied across various rural settings. The findings provide insights for policymakers, agronomists, and rural development practitioners, emphasizing the importance of engaging local stakeholders and fostering sustainable practices that align with national and global sustainability goals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估印度农场一级的农业可持续性:采用混合方法进行比较研究
印度农村的农业可持续性对确保粮食安全和生计至关重要,尤其是对小农而言。许多农村社区混合了可持续和不可持续的耕作方式,在面对环境和社会经济挑战时影响了其农业生产力和复原力。目的本研究旨在评估农村农业社区内农业实践的可持续性。目标是确定资源管理和生产力方面的弱点,同时根据可持续发展目标指标2.4.1提出有针对性的干预措施,促进可持续做法。方法采用混合方法,通过调查、访谈和可持续性子指标,将定量和定性数据相结合。这项研究修改了粮农组织评估农业可持续性的方法,使之适合当地情况。进一步调整了Saiful参与性框架,以确保利益攸关方参与并纳入与文化相关的做法。还制定了一个可视化指标框架,以便有效地跟踪可持续性进展。结果与结论主要研究结果表明,虽然这些社区表现出提高可持续性的潜力,但资源管理和土地利用方面的关键弱点阻碍了生产力。该研究还强调了积极因素,例如社区推动的加强可持续实践的举措。分指标分析确定了优先干预领域,可视化框架为监测农场层面的可持续性提供了实用工具。结果表明,需要制定针对具体地区的政策,以解决农村社区面临的独特挑战。本研究通过开发一个适用于不同农村环境的适合当地的框架,有助于评估农业可持续性。研究结果为政策制定者、农学家和农村发展从业者提供了见解,强调了吸引当地利益相关者参与和促进符合国家和全球可持续发展目标的可持续实践的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying the opportunity costs of nature-inclusive agriculture in the Netherlands Exploring entry points to circularity in food production from a farming system perspective Export-attributed carbon footprint of cotton production in arid China: A life cycle and driver analysis Research frameworks in agricultural living labs: A systematic review and comparative analysis Greenhouse gas emission characteristics of farmland in the Guanzhong region under varied water-nitrogen management measures based on the DNDC model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1