POCUS literature primer: key papers on aorta and deep vein thrombosis POCUS.

IF 2 CJEM Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00865-x
Daniel J Kim, Tomislav Jelic, Claire L Heslop, Joey Newbigging, Steven Skitch, Talia Burwash-Brennan, Gillian Sheppard, Jordan Chenkin, Rajiv Thavanathan, Colin R Bell, Paul Atkinson, David Lewis, Frank Myslik, Elizabeth Lalande, Paul Olszynski
{"title":"POCUS literature primer: key papers on aorta and deep vein thrombosis POCUS.","authors":"Daniel J Kim, Tomislav Jelic, Claire L Heslop, Joey Newbigging, Steven Skitch, Talia Burwash-Brennan, Gillian Sheppard, Jordan Chenkin, Rajiv Thavanathan, Colin R Bell, Paul Atkinson, David Lewis, Frank Myslik, Elizabeth Lalande, Paul Olszynski","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00865-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to identify the top five most influential papers published on the use of aorta point of care ultrasound (POCUS) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) POCUS in adult patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 15-member expert panel was recruited from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Emergency Ultrasound Committee and the Canadian Ultrasound Fellowship Collaborative. The members of the expert panel all have ultrasound fellowship training (or equivalent), are active in POCUS research, and provide POCUS leadership locally and nationally. The panel used a modified Delphi process of three rounds of sequential surveys and discussion to achieve consensus on the top five most influential papers on aorta POCUS and DVT POCUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All panel members participated in all three rounds of this modified Delphi process. The panel initially nominated 33 relevant papers on aorta POCUS and 33 relevant papers on DVT POCUS. With the completion of round two, there were 11 candidate papers for aorta POCUS and 14 candidate papers for DVT POCUS. After meeting at the CAEP 2024 annual conference to discuss these papers and to build consensus, the panel ultimately identified the top five most influential papers on aorta POCUS and DVT POCUS after the completion of round three. Included papers focused on the diagnostic test characteristics of POCUS for the workup of suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm and DVT, as well as the clinical impact of POCUS on time to diagnosis and time to disposition in emergency settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This POCUS Literature Primer has generated a top-five list of the most influential papers on aorta POCUS and DVT POCUS. The papers in these lists can be considered core reading for all trainees and clinicians using these POCUS applications in their practice and serve as a foundation for future POCUS research.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"294-304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00865-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to identify the top five most influential papers published on the use of aorta point of care ultrasound (POCUS) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) POCUS in adult patients.

Methods: A 15-member expert panel was recruited from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Emergency Ultrasound Committee and the Canadian Ultrasound Fellowship Collaborative. The members of the expert panel all have ultrasound fellowship training (or equivalent), are active in POCUS research, and provide POCUS leadership locally and nationally. The panel used a modified Delphi process of three rounds of sequential surveys and discussion to achieve consensus on the top five most influential papers on aorta POCUS and DVT POCUS.

Results: All panel members participated in all three rounds of this modified Delphi process. The panel initially nominated 33 relevant papers on aorta POCUS and 33 relevant papers on DVT POCUS. With the completion of round two, there were 11 candidate papers for aorta POCUS and 14 candidate papers for DVT POCUS. After meeting at the CAEP 2024 annual conference to discuss these papers and to build consensus, the panel ultimately identified the top five most influential papers on aorta POCUS and DVT POCUS after the completion of round three. Included papers focused on the diagnostic test characteristics of POCUS for the workup of suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm and DVT, as well as the clinical impact of POCUS on time to diagnosis and time to disposition in emergency settings.

Conclusion: This POCUS Literature Primer has generated a top-five list of the most influential papers on aorta POCUS and DVT POCUS. The papers in these lists can be considered core reading for all trainees and clinicians using these POCUS applications in their practice and serve as a foundation for future POCUS research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
POCUS 文献入门:有关主动脉和深静脉血栓形成 POCUS 的重要文献。
目的:本研究的目的是识别在成人患者使用主动脉护理点超声(POCUS)和深静脉血栓形成(DVT) POCUS方面发表的最具影响力的前五篇论文。方法:从加拿大急诊医师协会(CAEP)急诊超声委员会和加拿大超声奖学金合作组织招募了15名专家小组成员。专家组成员均接受过超声研究员培训(或同等学历),积极参与POCUS研究,并在当地和全国范围内担任POCUS领导职务。专家组采用三轮顺序调查和讨论的改进德尔菲法,对主动脉POCUS和DVT POCUS最具影响力的前五篇论文达成共识。结果:所有小组成员都参加了这三轮改进的德尔菲过程。小组初步提名主动脉POCUS相关论文33篇,深静脉POCUS相关论文33篇。第二轮完成后,主动脉POCUS候选论文11篇,DVT POCUS候选论文14篇。在CAEP 2024年年会上进行讨论并达成共识后,专家组最终确定了第三轮完成后主动脉POCUS和DVT POCUS最具影响力的前五篇论文。纳入的论文重点是POCUS在疑似腹主动脉瘤和深静脉血栓诊断中的诊断试验特点,以及POCUS对急诊诊断时间和处置时间的临床影响。结论:本次POCUS文献引文集已形成主动脉POCUS和DVT POCUS最具影响力的前五篇论文。这些列表中的论文可以被认为是所有在实践中使用这些POCUS应用程序的实习生和临床医生的核心阅读材料,并作为未来POCUS研究的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of intravenous nerinetide initiated by paramedics in the field for acute cerebral ischaemia within 3 h of symptom onset (FRONTIER): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Enhancing emergency department nursing retention through in-house ACLS training: a quality improvement initiative. ChatGPT-guided translation of pediatric emergency department discharge instructions. Between algorithms and humanity: what we risk losing in the age of artificial intelligence. Two- vs three-hour hs-cTnI algorithms for ruling out acute myocardial infarction using the Beckman access high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1