Comparative study between unilateral and bilateral extrapedicular approaches for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A retrospective study.

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Science Progress Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/00368504251318194
Xuequan Zhao, Xixi Han, Chenxu Li, Baoguo Han, Tianjiao Zhu, Yuxue Shi, Qinglei Liu, Yafeng Zhang
{"title":"Comparative study between unilateral and bilateral extrapedicular approaches for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A retrospective study.","authors":"Xuequan Zhao, Xixi Han, Chenxu Li, Baoguo Han, Tianjiao Zhu, Yuxue Shi, Qinglei Liu, Yafeng Zhang","doi":"10.1177/00368504251318194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a primary treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Historically, surgeons preferred a bilateral approach for PVP; however, this approach may impose greater financial strain on patients. This retrospective study examines the efficacy of the unilateral approach compared to the bilateral approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of193 patients were categorized into Group A (unilaterally extrapedicular approach) and Group B (bilateral approach) based on the operative method. Efficacy was evaluated using perioperative indicators, follow-up results, and imaging evaluation results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 193 patients involved, 169 were eligible for analysis. All patients completed follow-up visits lasting 49-70 months. Compared to Group B, Group A exhibited significantly shorter operation time, puncture duration, amount of bone cement injected, and number of X-ray fluoroscopies (<i>P </i>< 0.05). While initial pain reduction, as measured by the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores, was lower in Group A, the difference between the groups narrowed by the final follow-up. At the final imaging follow-up, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding the relative height of the injured vertebral bodies and local Cobb angle measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This technique holds the potential for accelerated patient rehabilitation and reduced hospitalization expenses, presenting a promising treatment option for OVCF patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56061,"journal":{"name":"Science Progress","volume":"108 1","pages":"368504251318194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Progress","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251318194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a primary treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Historically, surgeons preferred a bilateral approach for PVP; however, this approach may impose greater financial strain on patients. This retrospective study examines the efficacy of the unilateral approach compared to the bilateral approach.

Methods: A total of193 patients were categorized into Group A (unilaterally extrapedicular approach) and Group B (bilateral approach) based on the operative method. Efficacy was evaluated using perioperative indicators, follow-up results, and imaging evaluation results.

Results: Out of the 193 patients involved, 169 were eligible for analysis. All patients completed follow-up visits lasting 49-70 months. Compared to Group B, Group A exhibited significantly shorter operation time, puncture duration, amount of bone cement injected, and number of X-ray fluoroscopies (P < 0.05). While initial pain reduction, as measured by the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores, was lower in Group A, the difference between the groups narrowed by the final follow-up. At the final imaging follow-up, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding the relative height of the injured vertebral bodies and local Cobb angle measurements.

Conclusions: This technique holds the potential for accelerated patient rehabilitation and reduced hospitalization expenses, presenting a promising treatment option for OVCF patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单侧与双侧椎弓根外入路治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的比较研究:回顾性研究。
目的:经皮椎体成形术(PVP)是治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)的主要方法。历史上,外科医生倾向于双侧入路治疗PVP;然而,这种方法可能会给患者带来更大的经济压力。本回顾性研究考察了单侧入路与双侧入路的疗效。方法:193例患者根据手术方式分为A组(单侧椎弓根外入路)和B组(双侧入路)。采用围手术期指标、随访结果及影像学评价结果评价疗效。结果:193例患者中,169例符合分析条件。所有患者均完成了49-70个月的随访。与B组相比,A组手术时间、穿刺时间、骨水泥注射量、x线透视次数均显著缩短(P)。结论:该技术具有加速患者康复、降低住院费用的潜力,是OVCF患者的一种很有前景的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science Progress
Science Progress Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: Science Progress has for over 100 years been a highly regarded review publication in science, technology and medicine. Its objective is to excite the readers'' interest in areas with which they may not be fully familiar but which could facilitate their interest, or even activity, in a cognate field.
期刊最新文献
The role of circRNAs in N6-methyladenosine(m6A), cell death and clinical applications in human breast cancer. Machine learning-based DNA microarray analysis for disease detection using the MICRO-AI framework. Endovascular repair of persistent sciatic artery aneurysm: A case report and imaging diagnosis insights. Comparison of survival and establishment of prognostic models for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx at different sites: A retrospective study based on the SEER database. Effects of seed packaging, storage conditions, and durations on seed quality of open-pollinated maize (Zea mays L.) varieties in Ethiopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1