Candida auris screening of high-risk patients: a descriptive comparison of 2 strategies.

Laura Pedersen, Aldo Barajas-Ochoa, Kaila Cooper, Jenna Price, Kathryn Hannum, Yvette Major, Patrick R Ching, Barry Rittmann, Alexandra Bryson, Christoper Doern, Michelle Doll
{"title":"<i>Candida auris</i> screening of high-risk patients: a descriptive comparison of 2 strategies.","authors":"Laura Pedersen, Aldo Barajas-Ochoa, Kaila Cooper, Jenna Price, Kathryn Hannum, Yvette Major, Patrick R Ching, Barry Rittmann, Alexandra Bryson, Christoper Doern, Michelle Doll","doi":"10.1017/ash.2024.504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared two <i>Candida auris</i> screening strategies in high-risk patients. The positivity rates for point prevalence survey (PPS) and admission screening were similar: 3.9% versus 3.4%, respectively, <i>P</i> = 1.00. Approximately 3% of high-risk patients are colonized, thus there is a need for a universal infection prevention approach for <i>C. auris.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2024.504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compared two Candida auris screening strategies in high-risk patients. The positivity rates for point prevalence survey (PPS) and admission screening were similar: 3.9% versus 3.4%, respectively, P = 1.00. Approximately 3% of high-risk patients are colonized, thus there is a need for a universal infection prevention approach for C. auris.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高危患者耳念珠菌筛查:两种策略的描述性比较
我们比较了高危患者的两种耳念珠菌筛查策略。点患病率调查(PPS)阳性率与入院筛查阳性率相似,分别为3.9%和3.4%,P = 1.00。大约3%的高危患者被定植,因此有必要对金黄色葡萄球菌采取普遍的感染预防方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing antimicrobial stewardship through IT-enabled audits: a quasi-experimental study in urology. Community-onset symptomatic urinary tract infections (SUTI) caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales: independent predictors and comparative effectiveness of oral agents. Effective spectrum-based antibiotic resistance index for monitoring resistance in Gram-negative bacilli. Molecular epidemiology and clinical differentiation between Clostridioides difficile infection and colonization across three chicago medical centers. Patient and healthcare professionals' perceptions of educational tools to reduce urine culture contamination in outpatient clinics: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1