Economic or Political Outcomes: Corporate Political Activity in a Populist Setting

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115234
Hammad ul Haq, Andrea Kuiken
{"title":"Economic or Political Outcomes: Corporate Political Activity in a Populist Setting","authors":"Hammad ul Haq,&nbsp;Andrea Kuiken","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on corporate political activity has traditionally emphasized how businesses leverage economic outcomes, such as job creation and tax contributions, to influence policy decisions vis-à-vis the government. However, with the surge of populism in liberal democracies, we argue that businesses can no longer rely solely on economic outcomes. Through a qualitative analysis of information presented by the automotive and fishery sectors during Brexit negotiations, we find that businesses opposing populist policies highlight the economic consequences of proposed policies. These businesses aim to encourage populist governments to act responsibly, urging them to heed the concerns of influential companies and prioritize economic stability. In contrast, our contribution to existing research reveals that businesses supporting populist policies prioritize political outcomes, for example, by linking policy proposals to electoral success. This focus on political outcomes is unique to populist settings, where populist governments are particularly responsive to public sentiment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 115234"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000578","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on corporate political activity has traditionally emphasized how businesses leverage economic outcomes, such as job creation and tax contributions, to influence policy decisions vis-à-vis the government. However, with the surge of populism in liberal democracies, we argue that businesses can no longer rely solely on economic outcomes. Through a qualitative analysis of information presented by the automotive and fishery sectors during Brexit negotiations, we find that businesses opposing populist policies highlight the economic consequences of proposed policies. These businesses aim to encourage populist governments to act responsibly, urging them to heed the concerns of influential companies and prioritize economic stability. In contrast, our contribution to existing research reveals that businesses supporting populist policies prioritize political outcomes, for example, by linking policy proposals to electoral success. This focus on political outcomes is unique to populist settings, where populist governments are particularly responsive to public sentiment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济或政治结果:民粹主义背景下的企业政治活动
对企业政治活动的研究传统上强调企业如何利用经济成果,如创造就业机会和税收贡献,来影响对-à-vis政府的政策决定。然而,随着民粹主义在自由民主国家的兴起,我们认为企业不能再仅仅依赖经济结果。通过对英国脱欧谈判期间汽车和渔业部门提供的信息进行定性分析,我们发现,反对民粹主义政策的企业强调了拟议政策的经济后果。这些企业旨在鼓励民粹主义政府采取负责任的行动,敦促他们听取有影响力的公司的担忧,优先考虑经济稳定。相比之下,我们对现有研究的贡献表明,支持民粹主义政策的企业优先考虑政治结果,例如,通过将政策提案与选举成功联系起来。这种对政治结果的关注是民粹主义环境所特有的,民粹主义政府对公众情绪尤其敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Understanding funding success in green crowdfunding: a cross-context analysis Resilience of inter-organizational innovation collaboration in turbulent times: A behavioral theory of the firm perspective Data-driven pricing in markets with single and multi-unit buyers: Winners and losers Building social legitimacy through NGOs partnerships: evidence from micro-multinationals I hereby consent: Leveraging consent management and chatbot anthropomorphism to influence information disclosure and usage intentions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1