Decision-Making Factors Among Dentists for Using Dental Magnifying Loupes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1.8 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCIDE.S501104
Maryam A Alghilan, Aram AlShehri, Azzam Almeshrafi, Abdulmajeed Alrumi, Omar Aldibasi
{"title":"Decision-Making Factors Among Dentists for Using Dental Magnifying Loupes: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Maryam A Alghilan, Aram AlShehri, Azzam Almeshrafi, Abdulmajeed Alrumi, Omar Aldibasi","doi":"10.2147/CCIDE.S501104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dental magnifying loupes (DMLs) allow better visualization of the operative field and operator's seating postures. This study aimed to investigate factors influencing the usage and selection of DMLs among dentists and determine the self-reported musculoskeletal pain and perception regarding DMLs usage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validated self-reported questionnaire of 19 items assessing participant's characteristics and DMLs usage was distributed to individuals who fit the inclusion criteria: practicing general dentists/dental intern and resident/specialized dentist in various dental specialties. The data were collected and then statistically analyzed using comparisons tests (chi-square/Fisher's exact test) and logistic regression with significance level (p-value) below 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate for this study's questionnaire was 97.33%. There is a significant association between the use of DMLs and training using them in dental school (p < 0.002). Using DMLs in endodontic treatment is significantly associated with the general dentist professional classification. Specialized dentists are 1.94-times more likely to use DMLs than general dentists (p < 0.001). The majority (50%) of DML users believe that DMLs are best used during undergraduate training. Using DMLs for \"better vision\" was the most selected (63.64%) option by DMLs users, followed by \"increased clinical efficacy\" (61.36%), \"improved patient care\" (50%), and \"better ergonomics\" (47.73%). Of dentists who did not use DMLs, 66.90% reported that DMLs being expensive was a limitation to their usage. Almost 91% dentists who have neck and shoulder discomfort (n = 219) do not use DMLs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DMLs are under-utilized by dentists. The major factors limiting their use are the high cost and lack of training regarding their use in dental school. Addressing these two factors may contribute to a positive shift in the utilization of DMLs by a larger number of dentists.</p>","PeriodicalId":10445,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","volume":"17 ","pages":"99-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S501104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Dental magnifying loupes (DMLs) allow better visualization of the operative field and operator's seating postures. This study aimed to investigate factors influencing the usage and selection of DMLs among dentists and determine the self-reported musculoskeletal pain and perception regarding DMLs usage.

Methods: A validated self-reported questionnaire of 19 items assessing participant's characteristics and DMLs usage was distributed to individuals who fit the inclusion criteria: practicing general dentists/dental intern and resident/specialized dentist in various dental specialties. The data were collected and then statistically analyzed using comparisons tests (chi-square/Fisher's exact test) and logistic regression with significance level (p-value) below 0.05.

Results: The response rate for this study's questionnaire was 97.33%. There is a significant association between the use of DMLs and training using them in dental school (p < 0.002). Using DMLs in endodontic treatment is significantly associated with the general dentist professional classification. Specialized dentists are 1.94-times more likely to use DMLs than general dentists (p < 0.001). The majority (50%) of DML users believe that DMLs are best used during undergraduate training. Using DMLs for "better vision" was the most selected (63.64%) option by DMLs users, followed by "increased clinical efficacy" (61.36%), "improved patient care" (50%), and "better ergonomics" (47.73%). Of dentists who did not use DMLs, 66.90% reported that DMLs being expensive was a limitation to their usage. Almost 91% dentists who have neck and shoulder discomfort (n = 219) do not use DMLs.

Conclusion: DMLs are under-utilized by dentists. The major factors limiting their use are the high cost and lack of training regarding their use in dental school. Addressing these two factors may contribute to a positive shift in the utilization of DMLs by a larger number of dentists.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙医使用牙科放大镜的决策因素:一项横断面研究。
目的:牙科放大镜(dml)可以更好地观察手术视野和操作人员的坐姿。本研究旨在探讨影响牙医使用和选择dml的因素,并确定自我报告的肌肉骨骼疼痛和对dml使用的感知。方法:将一份包含19个项目的评估参与者特征和dml使用情况的自我报告问卷分发给符合纳入标准的个体:不同牙科专业的执业普通牙医/牙科实习生和住院医师/专科牙医。收集资料后,采用比较检验(卡方/Fisher精确检验)和显著性水平(p值)低于0.05的逻辑回归进行统计学分析。结果:本研究问卷的应答率为97.33%。dml的使用与牙科学校使用dml的培训之间存在显著关联(p < 0.002)。在根管治疗中使用dml与一般牙医专业分类有显著相关性。专科牙医使用dml的可能性是普通牙医的1.94倍(p < 0.001)。大多数(50%)DML用户认为DML最好在本科培训期间使用。使用dml是为了“更好的视力”(63.64%),其次是“提高临床疗效”(61.36%)、“改善病人护理”(50%)和“更好的人体工程学”(47.73%)。在不使用dml的牙医中,66.90%的人报告dml价格昂贵是限制其使用的一个因素。几乎91%有颈部和肩部不适的牙医(n = 219)不使用dml。结论:dml未被牙医充分利用。限制其使用的主要因素是高成本和缺乏在牙科学校使用的培训。解决这两个因素可能有助于一个积极的转变,在使用dml由更多的牙医。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
43
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fluoride-Free Toothpastes for Caries Prevention: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence on Active Ingredients. Proximal Contact Loss and Interproximal Caries in Natural Teeth Adjacent to Dental Implants. A Review. Evaluation and Comparison of Third Molar Agenesis Among Indian and Malaysian Subpopulations: A Retrospective Orthopantomographic Study. The Stain Reduction and Whitening Efficacy of an Enzyme-Enhanced Mouthwash: A Comparative Study. Clinical Features of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: An Observational Clinical Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1