Nasal Reshaping Using Barbed Threads Combined With Hyaluronic Acid Filler and Botulinum Toxin A

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1111/jocd.70047
G. Ziade, R. Saade, D. Daou, D. Karam, A. Bendito, M. Tsintsadze
{"title":"Nasal Reshaping Using Barbed Threads Combined With Hyaluronic Acid Filler and Botulinum Toxin A","authors":"G. Ziade,&nbsp;R. Saade,&nbsp;D. Daou,&nbsp;D. Karam,&nbsp;A. Bendito,&nbsp;M. Tsintsadze","doi":"10.1111/jocd.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Rhinoplasty is a prominent procedure in facial aesthetics, but extended surgical downtime remains its significant limitation. Nonsurgical rhinoplasty has gained popularity as an alternative, offering significant aesthetic improvements with minimal downtime. This study evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of three nonsurgical rhinoplasty techniques combined, including hyaluronic acid (HA) filler, botulinum toxin type A (BTX), and barbed lifting threads.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 85 patients were included into three groups: 63 subjects received HA filler and BTX injections, 9 subjects received barbed threads followed by BTX injections, and 13 received threads followed by HA filler and BTX injections. Patients assessed their satisfaction 1 month and a year posttreatment as well as adverse effects 48 h and 1 week after treatment using FACE-Q questionnaire for nose.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both 1 month and a year after treatment, the triple combination of barbed threads with HA filler and BTX demonstrated superior nose FACE-Q scores compared to the two other groups, showing highest patient satisfaction and minimal efficacy decay over time. No significant difference in FACE-Q scores was observed between the two groups receiving HA filler + BTX and barbed threads + BTX at either 1 month or a year posttreatment. Adverse effects were reported by subjects in all three groups 48 h posttreatment and completely resolved by 1 week after treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Combining nonsurgical rhinoplasty techniques—such as lifting threads, HA fillers, and botulinum toxin—can deliver effective aesthetic improvements with minimal downtime. Among these, the triple combination of HA filler, BTX, and lifting threads results in the highest and most sustained patient satisfaction, lasting no less than 1 year.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocd.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.70047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Rhinoplasty is a prominent procedure in facial aesthetics, but extended surgical downtime remains its significant limitation. Nonsurgical rhinoplasty has gained popularity as an alternative, offering significant aesthetic improvements with minimal downtime. This study evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of three nonsurgical rhinoplasty techniques combined, including hyaluronic acid (HA) filler, botulinum toxin type A (BTX), and barbed lifting threads.

Methods

A total of 85 patients were included into three groups: 63 subjects received HA filler and BTX injections, 9 subjects received barbed threads followed by BTX injections, and 13 received threads followed by HA filler and BTX injections. Patients assessed their satisfaction 1 month and a year posttreatment as well as adverse effects 48 h and 1 week after treatment using FACE-Q questionnaire for nose.

Results

Both 1 month and a year after treatment, the triple combination of barbed threads with HA filler and BTX demonstrated superior nose FACE-Q scores compared to the two other groups, showing highest patient satisfaction and minimal efficacy decay over time. No significant difference in FACE-Q scores was observed between the two groups receiving HA filler + BTX and barbed threads + BTX at either 1 month or a year posttreatment. Adverse effects were reported by subjects in all three groups 48 h posttreatment and completely resolved by 1 week after treatment.

Conclusion

Combining nonsurgical rhinoplasty techniques—such as lifting threads, HA fillers, and botulinum toxin—can deliver effective aesthetic improvements with minimal downtime. Among these, the triple combination of HA filler, BTX, and lifting threads results in the highest and most sustained patient satisfaction, lasting no less than 1 year.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用带刺螺纹结合透明质酸填充剂和 A 型肉毒杆菌毒素重塑鼻形
鼻整形术是面部美学的重要手术,但延长手术时间仍然是其显著的局限性。非手术鼻整形术作为一种替代方法越来越受欢迎,它以最小的停机时间提供了显著的美学改善。本研究评估了三种非手术隆鼻技术的临床疗效和安全性,包括透明质酸(HA)填充剂、A型肉毒杆菌毒素(BTX)和有刺提升线。方法85例患者分为3组:63例采用HA填充剂并注射BTX, 9例采用倒刺穿刺针先注射BTX, 13例采用穿刺针后注射HA填充剂和BTX。采用FACE-Q鼻部问卷评估患者治疗后1个月、1年的满意度及治疗后48小时、1周的不良反应。结果在治疗后1个月和1年,与其他两组相比,倒刺线与HA填充物和BTX三联疗法的鼻子FACE-Q评分均优于其他两组,患者满意度最高,疗效随时间的衰减最小。在治疗后1个月或1年,两组接受HA填料+ BTX和倒刺线+ BTX的FACE-Q评分无显著差异。三组受试者均在治疗后48小时报告了不良反应,并在治疗后1周完全消除。结论结合非手术鼻整形技术,如提升线、透明质酸填充物和肉毒杆菌毒素,可以在最短的停机时间内实现有效的美学改善。其中,HA填充物、BTX和提升螺纹的三种组合可获得最高和最持久的患者满意度,持续时间不少于1年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
818
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques. The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy Versus Cryotherapy for Actinic Keratosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Procedural Treatments as Adjuncts in the Management of Acne Vulgaris: A Narrative Review Evaluating the Effectiveness of Commercial Oral Supplements for Hair Growth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Issue Information Commentary to Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveal Human Skin Pathways and Introduction of a New Dior Skin Longevity Compass™
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1