From intellectual imperialism to open system: Reassessing the "Americanization" of social psychology through Festinger's frustration with the SSRC's project on transnational social psychology.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES History of Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1037/hop0000274
Verena Lehmbrock
{"title":"From intellectual imperialism to open system: Reassessing the \"Americanization\" of social psychology through Festinger's frustration with the SSRC's project on transnational social psychology.","authors":"Verena Lehmbrock","doi":"10.1037/hop0000274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article investigates the development of social psychology post-World War II through the lens of the Committee on Transnational Social Psychology, established in 1963 under the American Social Science Research Council (SSRC) and led by American psychologist Leon Festinger. Initially envisioned as a vehicle for globalizing U.S. experimental social psychology, the Committee aimed to create research hubs worldwide with similarly trained psychologists. However, Festinger's growing dissatisfaction with the Committee's trajectory around 1970 underscores significant challenges to its original objectives. Based on a close reading of archival files and documents from the SSRC and related sources, this article explores these challenges and questions overly simplistic \"imperial\" interpretations of U.S. philanthropic research funding. It argues that the SSRC's influence, particularly its emphasis on intellectual and personal diversity, played a crucial role in counteracting any straightforward \"Americanization.\" Facilitating the assimilation of different intellectual traditions, European key figures, such as Moscovici, benefited from the SSRC's support and influence, which helped them to gain prominence and shape the Committee's direction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the development of social psychology post-World War II through the lens of the Committee on Transnational Social Psychology, established in 1963 under the American Social Science Research Council (SSRC) and led by American psychologist Leon Festinger. Initially envisioned as a vehicle for globalizing U.S. experimental social psychology, the Committee aimed to create research hubs worldwide with similarly trained psychologists. However, Festinger's growing dissatisfaction with the Committee's trajectory around 1970 underscores significant challenges to its original objectives. Based on a close reading of archival files and documents from the SSRC and related sources, this article explores these challenges and questions overly simplistic "imperial" interpretations of U.S. philanthropic research funding. It argues that the SSRC's influence, particularly its emphasis on intellectual and personal diversity, played a crucial role in counteracting any straightforward "Americanization." Facilitating the assimilation of different intellectual traditions, European key figures, such as Moscovici, benefited from the SSRC's support and influence, which helped them to gain prominence and shape the Committee's direction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: History of Psychology features refereed articles addressing all aspects of psychology"s past and of its interrelationship with the many contexts within which it has emerged and has been practiced. It also publishes scholarly work in closely related areas, such as historical psychology (the history of consciousness and behavior), psychohistory, theory in psychology as it pertains to history, historiography, biography and autobiography, and the teaching of the history of psychology.
期刊最新文献
From intellectual imperialism to open system: Reassessing the "Americanization" of social psychology through Festinger's frustration with the SSRC's project on transnational social psychology. The Westernization of social and personality psychology in Turkey and the ongoing struggle for indigenous perspectives: A historical review and an agenda for liberating psychology. Reynaldo Alarcón Napurí: 100 years of the pioneer of historical studies of psychology in Peru. From coerced confessions to biased assessments: Lessons from 1928. The experimental method of adolescents: Bärbel Inhelder's unfinished symphony.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1