A comprehensive narrative review on paradigm shift in the treatment of esophageal and rectal cancer

Dimitrios Chatziisaak , Pascal Burri , Thomas Steffen , Stephan Bischofberger
{"title":"A comprehensive narrative review on paradigm shift in the treatment of esophageal and rectal cancer","authors":"Dimitrios Chatziisaak ,&nbsp;Pascal Burri ,&nbsp;Thomas Steffen ,&nbsp;Stephan Bischofberger","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The incidence of esophageal and rectal cancer is rising globally. The combination of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with watchful waiting (W&amp;W) strategies has been shown to be an effective approach for maintaining a high quality of life (QoL), particularly in the treatment of rectal cancer. This approach has recently been experimentally extended to the treatment of esophageal cancer. This narrative review provides an overview of the current status of nCRT and watchful waiting (W&amp;W) strategies in both cancer types.</div><div>The findings of the review indicate that nCRT significantly improves survival and response rates in both cancers. In patients with esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery resulted in a median overall survival that was nearly double the expected survival time and demonstrated high rates of complete pathological response. In the case of rectal cancer, nCRT has been shown to result in high rates of complete response, which in turn has the effect of organ preserving and improving overall oncological outcomes and QoL.</div><div>The review concludes that the W&amp;W strategies, initially developed for rectal cancer, can be safely extended to selected cases of esophageal cancer, making organ preservation a feasible option that improves patients' quality of life. It is imperative that internationally accepted guidelines and precise patient selection criteria are established to ensure consistent outcomes and enhance long-term monitoring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X25000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incidence of esophageal and rectal cancer is rising globally. The combination of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with watchful waiting (W&W) strategies has been shown to be an effective approach for maintaining a high quality of life (QoL), particularly in the treatment of rectal cancer. This approach has recently been experimentally extended to the treatment of esophageal cancer. This narrative review provides an overview of the current status of nCRT and watchful waiting (W&W) strategies in both cancer types.
The findings of the review indicate that nCRT significantly improves survival and response rates in both cancers. In patients with esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery resulted in a median overall survival that was nearly double the expected survival time and demonstrated high rates of complete pathological response. In the case of rectal cancer, nCRT has been shown to result in high rates of complete response, which in turn has the effect of organ preserving and improving overall oncological outcomes and QoL.
The review concludes that the W&W strategies, initially developed for rectal cancer, can be safely extended to selected cases of esophageal cancer, making organ preservation a feasible option that improves patients' quality of life. It is imperative that internationally accepted guidelines and precise patient selection criteria are established to ensure consistent outcomes and enhance long-term monitoring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive narrative review on paradigm shift in the treatment of esophageal and rectal cancer A combined scoring system for tumor budding and poorly differentiated clusters in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study Global disparities in surgical oncology: Bridging the gap in cancer care a challenge to overcome Patients who have undergone total gastrectomy investigation of self-management experiences on dumping syndrome Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of Vulvar cancer patients at a tertiary setting in Ethiopia: A 6-year review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1