Patient experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1097/GME.0000000000002504
Sarah Glynne, Daniel Reisel, Aini Kamal, Louise Newson
{"title":"Patient experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Sarah Glynne, Daniel Reisel, Aini Kamal, Louise Newson","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore women's experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey incorporating the validated Shared Decision Making SDM-Q-9 questionnaire was disseminated via social media to breast cancer survivors in the UK.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,195 women completed the survey. The menopause symptom burden was high (99.7%). Fear of recurrence was the dominant concern for 55.6% of women, but 44.4% were more concerned about quality of life and future risk of long-term conditions associated with estrogen deficiency. Women further from diagnosis were less concerned about recurrence (fear of recurrence was the dominant concern for 58.6% of women within 2 y of diagnosis vs. 43.1% of women more than 15 y from diagnosis, P = 0.001). Of all women, 68.3% were offered treatment (nonhormone treatment, 58.5%; vaginal hormones, 35.5%; menopause hormone therapy, 13.1%; testosterone, 10.1%). Menopause specialists were more likely to prescribe MHT versus nonmenopause specialists (68.2% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.0001); GP menopause specialists were more likely to prescribe testosterone versus gynecologist menopause specialists (60.8% vs. 39.2%, P < 0.0001). Of all women, 49.6% who were not offered menopause hormone therapy were willing to consider it, and 83.7% wanted more information about menopause hormone therapy. Information provision and time allocated to menopause-related discussion were poor (<10 min for 73.52% of women). Involvement in menopause-related treatment decisions was low (SDM-Q-9 median score, 11.1/100; IQR, 0.0-28.9). Women who consulted a menopause specialist (30.2%) were significantly more able to discuss their concerns (P < 0.001), were given significantly more time (>10 min for 75.6%, P < 0.001), and felt significantly more involved in menopause-related treatment decisions (P < 0.001). Overall, 96% of women wanted more support for menopausal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many women in the study cohort had unmet menopause-related health needs after breast cancer, and the quality of menopause care received was poor. Most women felt uninvolved in menopause-related treatment decisions. Women experienced higher quality menopause care if they had access to a menopause specialist.</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002504","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to explore women's experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK.

Methods: An online survey incorporating the validated Shared Decision Making SDM-Q-9 questionnaire was disseminated via social media to breast cancer survivors in the UK.

Results: A total of 1,195 women completed the survey. The menopause symptom burden was high (99.7%). Fear of recurrence was the dominant concern for 55.6% of women, but 44.4% were more concerned about quality of life and future risk of long-term conditions associated with estrogen deficiency. Women further from diagnosis were less concerned about recurrence (fear of recurrence was the dominant concern for 58.6% of women within 2 y of diagnosis vs. 43.1% of women more than 15 y from diagnosis, P = 0.001). Of all women, 68.3% were offered treatment (nonhormone treatment, 58.5%; vaginal hormones, 35.5%; menopause hormone therapy, 13.1%; testosterone, 10.1%). Menopause specialists were more likely to prescribe MHT versus nonmenopause specialists (68.2% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.0001); GP menopause specialists were more likely to prescribe testosterone versus gynecologist menopause specialists (60.8% vs. 39.2%, P < 0.0001). Of all women, 49.6% who were not offered menopause hormone therapy were willing to consider it, and 83.7% wanted more information about menopause hormone therapy. Information provision and time allocated to menopause-related discussion were poor (<10 min for 73.52% of women). Involvement in menopause-related treatment decisions was low (SDM-Q-9 median score, 11.1/100; IQR, 0.0-28.9). Women who consulted a menopause specialist (30.2%) were significantly more able to discuss their concerns (P < 0.001), were given significantly more time (>10 min for 75.6%, P < 0.001), and felt significantly more involved in menopause-related treatment decisions (P < 0.001). Overall, 96% of women wanted more support for menopausal symptoms.

Conclusions: Many women in the study cohort had unmet menopause-related health needs after breast cancer, and the quality of menopause care received was poor. Most women felt uninvolved in menopause-related treatment decisions. Women experienced higher quality menopause care if they had access to a menopause specialist.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.
期刊最新文献
Patient experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK: a cross-sectional study. The mediating role of genital self-perception in the relationship between attitudes toward menopause and sexual quality of life in postmenopausal women: a pilot study. Urodynamic evaluation of prasterone vaginal treatment of mild to moderate urge incontinence in women with vulvovaginal atrophy: multicenter prospective study. Underdiagnosed but overtreated? Finding the role of modern therapies in the management of overactive bladder. Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1