FINDRISC modified for Cuba as a tool for the detection of prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in cuban population.

Eduardo Cabrera-Rode, Oscar Díaz-Díaz, Neraldo Orlandi González, Mohan Ronald
{"title":"FINDRISC modified for Cuba as a tool for the detection of prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in cuban population.","authors":"Eduardo Cabrera-Rode, Oscar Díaz-Díaz, Neraldo Orlandi González, Mohan Ronald","doi":"10.17843/rpmesp.2024.414.14138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motivation for the study. There is an increase in obesity and diabetes mellitus cases in Cuba, so it is necessary to provide easy to use, fast and inexpensive tools for the identification of people with dysglycemia. Main findings. For the first time in CUBA, the optimal cut-off point for FINDRISC, LA-FINDRISC and modified FINDRISC for Cuba (CUBDRISC) questionnaires was established with its own anthropometric parameters to identify people with dysglycemia. Implications. The use of the CUBDRISC scale as a simple, fast and low-cost tool for the active screening of people with dysglycemia in Cuban population will be useful to establish timely intervention strategies for people with risk score to develop dysglycemia.</p><p><strong>Objectives.: </strong>To evaluate the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) modified for Cuba as a tool for the detection of prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in Cuban population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods.: </strong>An analytical cross-sectional and secondary source epidemiological study was conducted in 3737 adults aged 19 years and older with at least one risk factor for diabetes, they did not have previous diagnosis of prediabetes and diabetes mellitus and underwent oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of dysglycemia. We applied the FINDRISC and the FINDRISC modified for Latin America (LA-FINDRISC) and Cuba (CUBDRISC), each with their own anthropometric parameters. The ROC curve was used to establish the cut-off point of each scale for the diagnosis of dysglycemia. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated. The concordance between scales was calculated with Cohen's Kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results.: </strong>We found that 34.5% (n=1289) of the subjects were diagnosed with dysglycemia (28.1% had prediabetes and 6.4% had type 2 diabetes without previous diagnosis). The LA-FINDRISC and CUBDRISC scales showed an almost perfect concordance with the FINDRISC scale for the different cut-off values from 11 to 16 (0.882-0.890 and 0.910-0.922, respectively). The optimal cutoff point for detecting persons with dysglycemia was ≥ 13 for the FINDRISC and CUBDRISC scales (sensitivity was 63.6% and 61.6%; specificity was 84.3% and 86.0%, respectively) and ≥11 for LA-FINDRISC (sensitivity 58.0% and specificity 88.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.: </strong>We found almost perfect concordance between the diabetes risk scales. The FINDRISC score modified for Cuba proved to be a useful tool to identify persons with prediabetes and diabetes with a cut-off point of 13 in a Cuban population.</p>","PeriodicalId":53651,"journal":{"name":"Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica","volume":"41 4","pages":"351-364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2024.414.14138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Motivation for the study. There is an increase in obesity and diabetes mellitus cases in Cuba, so it is necessary to provide easy to use, fast and inexpensive tools for the identification of people with dysglycemia. Main findings. For the first time in CUBA, the optimal cut-off point for FINDRISC, LA-FINDRISC and modified FINDRISC for Cuba (CUBDRISC) questionnaires was established with its own anthropometric parameters to identify people with dysglycemia. Implications. The use of the CUBDRISC scale as a simple, fast and low-cost tool for the active screening of people with dysglycemia in Cuban population will be useful to establish timely intervention strategies for people with risk score to develop dysglycemia.

Objectives.: To evaluate the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) modified for Cuba as a tool for the detection of prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in Cuban population.

Materials and methods.: An analytical cross-sectional and secondary source epidemiological study was conducted in 3737 adults aged 19 years and older with at least one risk factor for diabetes, they did not have previous diagnosis of prediabetes and diabetes mellitus and underwent oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of dysglycemia. We applied the FINDRISC and the FINDRISC modified for Latin America (LA-FINDRISC) and Cuba (CUBDRISC), each with their own anthropometric parameters. The ROC curve was used to establish the cut-off point of each scale for the diagnosis of dysglycemia. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated. The concordance between scales was calculated with Cohen's Kappa coefficient.

Results.: We found that 34.5% (n=1289) of the subjects were diagnosed with dysglycemia (28.1% had prediabetes and 6.4% had type 2 diabetes without previous diagnosis). The LA-FINDRISC and CUBDRISC scales showed an almost perfect concordance with the FINDRISC scale for the different cut-off values from 11 to 16 (0.882-0.890 and 0.910-0.922, respectively). The optimal cutoff point for detecting persons with dysglycemia was ≥ 13 for the FINDRISC and CUBDRISC scales (sensitivity was 63.6% and 61.6%; specificity was 84.3% and 86.0%, respectively) and ≥11 for LA-FINDRISC (sensitivity 58.0% and specificity 88.0%).

Conclusions.: We found almost perfect concordance between the diabetes risk scales. The FINDRISC score modified for Cuba proved to be a useful tool to identify persons with prediabetes and diabetes with a cut-off point of 13 in a Cuban population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica
Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública (RPMESP) es el órgano oficial de difusión científica del Instituto Nacional de Salud (INS) del Perú. Es una publicación arbitrada por pares, de periodicidad trimestral, de ámbito y difusión mundial, indizada en MEDLINE/Index Medicos, SCOPUS, EMBASE, SciELO Salud Pública y otras bases de datos internacionales. La RPMESP es distribuida en su versión impresa y electrónica, con acceso gratuito a texto completo. La RPMESP publica artículos referidos a temas del ámbito biomédico y de salud pública, resaltando aportes prácticos, que contribuyan a mejorar la situación de salud del país y de la región. Propicia el intercambio de la experiencia científica en salud entre instituciones y personas dedicadas a la investigación dentro y fuera del Perú a fin de promover el avance y la aplicación de la investigación en salud.
期刊最新文献
Aedes aegypti bred from vegetables collected in localities exposed to pyriproxyfen in Sullana, Peru, 2024. Active search for tuberculosis in three youth detention centers in Peru. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in a private health insurance center in Argentina from 2008 to 2022. Apical periodontitis and its effects on renal tissue in rats. Capillary leak syndrome due to snakebite in the Amazon: case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1