Field Investigation Evaluating the Efficacy of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Type 2 (PRRSV-2) Modified Live Vaccines in Nursery Pigs Exposed to Multiple Heterologous PRRSV Strains.

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the protective efficacy of modified live vaccines (MLVs) against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) in nursery pigs in a worst case scenario where MLV does not match the genetic profile of the field isolate, different MLVs are used for sows and piglets, and piglets are naturally exposed to genetically distinct heterologous PRRS virus (PRRSV) isolates. We divided 76,075, 2-week-old piglets from a seropositive sow herd vaccinated with US1-MLV into four groups. US1-MLV, US2-MLV, and US3-MLV groups were vaccinated with PRRSV-2 MLV including Ingelvac^® PRRS MLV (Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany), HP-PRRSV-2 based MLV (Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, CAAS, Harbin, China), and Prime Pac^® PRRS (MSD Animal Health, Rahway, NJ, USA), respectively. The NonVac group was left unvaccinated. At 0, 14, 28, and 56 days post-vaccination (DPV), sera were assayed for the presence of PRRSV-specific antibodies using ELISA and serum neutralization (SN), and PRRSV RNA using PCR. Average daily gain (ADG) and survival rates were compared between treatment groups. The results demonstrated vaccinated groups significantly improved in ADG compared to the non-vaccinated control group. Only US1-MLV and US3-MLV were able to significantly reduce mortality associated with field PRRSV infection in nursery pigs. Pigs vaccinated with US3-MLV displayed significantly lower mortality and higher ADG compared to all other groups. Field isolates were isolated and genetically compared to all three MLV vaccines at the start of the trial. The MLV with closest genetic similarity to the field isolate was US2-MLV by ORF5 gene comparison. This provided the lowest protection judging by ADG improvement and mortality reduction, as compared to US1-MLV and US3-MLV. Separately, strains of Thai PRRSV-2 isolates collected in 2017, 2019, and 2020 in the study area were investigated for evolutionary changes. Over time, we observed a shift in PRRSV-2 isolates from lineage 8.7 to lineage 1. The field isolates found shared 82.59-84.42%, 83.75-85.74%, and 84.25-85.90% nucleotide identity with the US1-MLV, US3-MLV and US2-MLV based vaccine, respectively. Our findings suggest genetic similarity between field viruses and vaccine strains should not be used as a predictor of field performance. We found that zootechnical performance of piglets was best in US3-MLV, despite sows being treated with a different vaccine The results also support that different MLVs can be used at different stages of production. Finally, we concluded that the shift from lineage 8.7 to lineage 1 was due to shifts in the worldwide prevalence of PRRSV isolates during that period of time and not due to vaccine recombination between isolates. Overall, MLV vaccine selection should be based on production performance and safety profile.