Biceps Tenodesis and SLAP Repair Show Similar Outcomes in Overhead Throwing Athletes with Baseball Pitchers Exhibiting Worse Rates of Return to Sport: A Systematic Review.

Benjamin T Lack, Justin T Childers, Colton C Mowers, Rodrigo S Berreta, Garrett R Jackson, Steven F DeFroda, Derrick M Knapik, Nikhil N Verma
{"title":"Biceps Tenodesis and SLAP Repair Show Similar Outcomes in Overhead Throwing Athletes with Baseball Pitchers Exhibiting Worse Rates of Return to Sport: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Benjamin T Lack, Justin T Childers, Colton C Mowers, Rodrigo S Berreta, Garrett R Jackson, Steven F DeFroda, Derrick M Knapik, Nikhil N Verma","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes, return-to-play (RTP) outcomes, and incidence of postoperative complications in overhead-throwing athletes with SLAP lesions undergoing SLAP repair versus BT with minimum one-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a literature search was conducted on July 9<sup>th</sup>, 2024, by querying PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria consisted of Level I-IV human clinical studies reporting RTP rate, complications, and/or failure rates following SLAP repair versus BT for SLAP lesions in overhead-throwing athletes with minimum one-year follow-up. Study quality was determined using the MINORS criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies from 2005 to 2023, reporting on 547 patients with a mean age ranging from 17.4-36.0 years and a mean follow-up ranging from 2.7-7.2 years, met inclusion criteria. Twelve studies (n=459 athletes) reported outcomes following SLAP repair and five (n=88 athletes) following BT. A total of 15 studies reported on baseball players, eight on softball players, and two on handball players. There were 220 pitchers who underwent SLAP repair compared to 34 pitchers who underwent BT. RTP rates for all throwers ranged from 37.5%- 94.7% following SLAP repair and 35.3%-93.1% following BT. The RTP rate for pitchers and position players following SLAP repair ranged from 40%-80% and 76.3%-91.3%, respectively, compared to 16.7% and 80%, respectively, following BT. Complication rates ranged from 0%-21.8% following SLAP repair compared to 0% following BT. Failure rates and revisions ranged from 7.5%-12.5% for SLAP repair versus 0% for BT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In overhead-throwing athletes with SLAP tears, an analysis of 547 patients from 16 studies shows variable RTP rates following SLAP repair and BT, with baseball pitchers having lower RTP rates compared to position players for both procedures. Outcomes for both SLAP repair and BT exhibit massive variability when treating SLAP tears in overhead-throwers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes, return-to-play (RTP) outcomes, and incidence of postoperative complications in overhead-throwing athletes with SLAP lesions undergoing SLAP repair versus BT with minimum one-year follow-up.

Methods: Using the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a literature search was conducted on July 9th, 2024, by querying PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria consisted of Level I-IV human clinical studies reporting RTP rate, complications, and/or failure rates following SLAP repair versus BT for SLAP lesions in overhead-throwing athletes with minimum one-year follow-up. Study quality was determined using the MINORS criteria.

Results: A total of 16 studies from 2005 to 2023, reporting on 547 patients with a mean age ranging from 17.4-36.0 years and a mean follow-up ranging from 2.7-7.2 years, met inclusion criteria. Twelve studies (n=459 athletes) reported outcomes following SLAP repair and five (n=88 athletes) following BT. A total of 15 studies reported on baseball players, eight on softball players, and two on handball players. There were 220 pitchers who underwent SLAP repair compared to 34 pitchers who underwent BT. RTP rates for all throwers ranged from 37.5%- 94.7% following SLAP repair and 35.3%-93.1% following BT. The RTP rate for pitchers and position players following SLAP repair ranged from 40%-80% and 76.3%-91.3%, respectively, compared to 16.7% and 80%, respectively, following BT. Complication rates ranged from 0%-21.8% following SLAP repair compared to 0% following BT. Failure rates and revisions ranged from 7.5%-12.5% for SLAP repair versus 0% for BT.

Conclusion: In overhead-throwing athletes with SLAP tears, an analysis of 547 patients from 16 studies shows variable RTP rates following SLAP repair and BT, with baseball pitchers having lower RTP rates compared to position players for both procedures. Outcomes for both SLAP repair and BT exhibit massive variability when treating SLAP tears in overhead-throwers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:比较接受SLAP修复术与BT术(至少随访一年)的高空投掷运动员SLAP病变的临床结果、重返赛场(RTP)结果以及术后并发症的发生率:2024 年 7 月 9 日,根据 2020 年系统综述和元分析首选报告项目指南,通过查询 PubMed、Scopus 和 EMBASE 数据库进行了文献检索。纳入标准包括 I-IV 级人类临床研究,这些研究报告了高空投掷运动员 SLAP 病变 SLAP 修复术与 BT 术后的 RTP 率、并发症和/或失败率,随访时间至少为一年。研究质量采用 MINORS 标准确定:结果:2005 年至 2023 年期间共有 16 项研究符合纳入标准,报告了 547 名患者,平均年龄为 17.4-36.0 岁,平均随访时间为 2.7-7.2 年。12项研究(n=459名运动员)报告了SLAP修复术后的疗效,5项研究(n=88名运动员)报告了BT术后的疗效。共有 15 项研究报告了棒球运动员的情况,8 项报告了垒球运动员的情况,2 项报告了手球运动员的情况。有 220 名投手接受了 SLAP 修复术,而 34 名投手接受了 BT。所有投手在接受 SLAP 修复术后的 RTP 率从 37.5% 到 94.7% 不等,在接受 BT 术后的 RTP 率从 35.3% 到 93.1% 不等。在 SLAP 修复术后,投手和位置球员的 RTP 率分别为 40%-80% 和 76.3%-91.3% ,而在 BT 术后,RTP 率分别为 16.7% 和 80%。SLAP 修复术后的并发症发生率为 0%-21.8%,而 BT 修复术后的并发症发生率为 0%。SLAP修复术的失败率和翻修率为7.5%-12.5%,而BT修复术的失败率和翻修率为0%:对 16 项研究的 547 名患者进行的分析表明,SLAP 修复术和 BT 术后的 RTP 率各不相同,棒球投手的 RTP 率低于体位运动员。在治疗高空投掷运动员的SLAP撕裂时,SLAP修复术和BT术的结果存在很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
ASMAR Special Issue: Injury Prevention is Optimized Using Cutting Edge Rehabilitation Strategies. Editorial Commentary: Open Bankart Procedure for Anterior Shoulder Instability is Recommended for Contact Athletes With Bony Bankart Fractures or Approximately 10% of Glenoid Bone Loss. Biceps Tenodesis and SLAP Repair Show Similar Outcomes in Overhead Throwing Athletes with Baseball Pitchers Exhibiting Worse Rates of Return to Sport: A Systematic Review. Experts Achieve Consensus on a Majority of Statements Regarding Ethics, Transparency, Regulation and Best Practices for the Use of Orthobiologics. Utility of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) in Orthopaedic Surgery Remains Questionable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1