Effect of Pro-, Pre- and Synbiotic Supplementation on the Growth of Infants and Children: An Umbrella Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Journal of paediatrics and child health Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1111/jpc.16789
Shengnan An, Jinfeng Kong, Asghar Ghorbani, Azadeh Dehghani, Shahab Alizadeh
{"title":"Effect of Pro-, Pre- and Synbiotic Supplementation on the Growth of Infants and Children: An Umbrella Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Shengnan An,&nbsp;Jinfeng Kong,&nbsp;Asghar Ghorbani,&nbsp;Azadeh Dehghani,&nbsp;Shahab Alizadeh","doi":"10.1111/jpc.16789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In recent years, pro-, pre- and synbiotics have been suggested to positively influence the growth outcomes of infants and children. However, the findings have been inconsistent. This umbrella meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate this effect.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were systematically searched until June 2024 to identify relevant studies. Weight gain, length gain, head circumstance (HC) gain, body mass index (BMI) as well as weight-for-height (WHZ), height-for-age (HAZ), weight-for-age (WAZ) and BMI-for-age (BMIAZ) <i>Z</i>-scores were considered as the outcomes. Standardised mean differences (SMD) along with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilised to estimate the overall effect size. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify the sources of heterogeneity among the studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 26 meta-analyses, which encompassed a total of 72 285 participants. The pooled umbrella analysis revealed positive effects of pro-, pre- and synbiotics on weight gain (SMD = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09–0.25) and height gain (SMD = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.01–0.19) in both healthy individuals and preterm infants, although significant heterogeneity was observed across the studies (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, the subgroup analyses indicated very weak evidence for an increase in BMI and WAZ following microbiome-based interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Supplementation with pro-, pre- and synbiotics has the potential to enhance weight and height gain in infants and children. Additional large-scale studies are needed to confirm their clinical applications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":"61 3","pages":"354-368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.16789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In recent years, pro-, pre- and synbiotics have been suggested to positively influence the growth outcomes of infants and children. However, the findings have been inconsistent. This umbrella meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate this effect.

Methods

The PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were systematically searched until June 2024 to identify relevant studies. Weight gain, length gain, head circumstance (HC) gain, body mass index (BMI) as well as weight-for-height (WHZ), height-for-age (HAZ), weight-for-age (WAZ) and BMI-for-age (BMIAZ) Z-scores were considered as the outcomes. Standardised mean differences (SMD) along with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilised to estimate the overall effect size. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify the sources of heterogeneity among the studies.

Results

We included 26 meta-analyses, which encompassed a total of 72 285 participants. The pooled umbrella analysis revealed positive effects of pro-, pre- and synbiotics on weight gain (SMD = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09–0.25) and height gain (SMD = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.01–0.19) in both healthy individuals and preterm infants, although significant heterogeneity was observed across the studies (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the subgroup analyses indicated very weak evidence for an increase in BMI and WAZ following microbiome-based interventions.

Conclusion

Supplementation with pro-, pre- and synbiotics has the potential to enhance weight and height gain in infants and children. Additional large-scale studies are needed to confirm their clinical applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原,预和合成补充对婴儿和儿童生长的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:近年来,前、前和合成抗生素已被认为对婴儿和儿童的生长结局有积极影响。然而,研究结果并不一致。本综合荟萃分析用于评估这一效应。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus数据库,检索到2024年6月的相关研究。以体重增加、身高增加、头部情况(HC)增加、体重指数(BMI)以及身高比(WHZ)、年龄比身高(HAZ)、年龄比体重(WAZ)和年龄比BMI (BMIAZ) z得分为结局。使用标准化平均差异(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)来估计总体效应大小。进行亚组分析以确定研究间异质性的来源。结果:我们纳入了26项荟萃分析,共纳入了72 285名参与者。综合伞式分析显示,在健康个体和早产儿中,原、前和合成制剂对体重增加(SMD = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09-0.25)和身高增加(SMD = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.01-0.19)都有积极作用,尽管在所有研究中观察到显著的异质性(p结论:补充原、前和合成制剂有可能增加婴儿和儿童的体重和身高增加。需要更多的大规模研究来证实它们的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
期刊最新文献
The Apprenticeship. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Children: An Evidence-Informed Narrative Review of Diagnosis, Management and Prevention. Awareness and Management of Paediatric Delirium: Differences Among Clinical Disciplines. Refractory Neonatal Hypernatraemia Caused by Congenital Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus. Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome in Paediatrics-Cautious Consideration or Considered Caution? Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1