Assessing the performance of GSMaP and IMERG in representing the diurnal cycle of precipitation in the Philippines during the southwest monsoon season

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Atmospheric Research Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.107983
Enrico Alejandro S. Taña , Lyndon Mark P. Olaguera , Shane Marie A. Visaga , Angela Monina T. Magnaye , Alyssa Gewell A. Llorin , Faye Abigail T. Cruz , Jose Ramon T. Villarin , Jun Matsumoto
{"title":"Assessing the performance of GSMaP and IMERG in representing the diurnal cycle of precipitation in the Philippines during the southwest monsoon season","authors":"Enrico Alejandro S. Taña ,&nbsp;Lyndon Mark P. Olaguera ,&nbsp;Shane Marie A. Visaga ,&nbsp;Angela Monina T. Magnaye ,&nbsp;Alyssa Gewell A. Llorin ,&nbsp;Faye Abigail T. Cruz ,&nbsp;Jose Ramon T. Villarin ,&nbsp;Jun Matsumoto","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.107983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Philippines faces the challenge of having a limited number of rain-gauge stations, which are a vital source of observation data. Satellite-based precipitation data is a viable alternative; however, it is necessary to assess the strengths and weaknesses of these products over various regions in the Philippines. This study analyzes the performance of two leading products from the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission, namely: GSMaP_G v08 and IMERG_F v07. In particular, the diurnal cycle of precipitation in the Philippines during the southwest monsoon season (May to September) from 2013 to 2018 is assessed, in terms of precipitation amount (PA), frequency (PF) and intensity (PI), which has not been done in previous works. Results show that GSMaP_G outperforms IMERG_F in capturing the diurnal cycle for PA and PF, whereas IMERG_F better captures PI as GSMaP_G tends to underestimate PI consistently. In terms of timing, peak values for PA (PPA) and PF (PPF) have similar patterns for both station data and satellite products where these events develop during the afternoon to evening hours (15 to 18 Local Standard Time). Further examination of the possible drivers of these observed patterns suggests that for both station data and IMERG_F, short-duration events have the highest frequency contribution (≥ 60 %), while GSMaP_G has higher contribution (≥ 40 %) from long-duration precipitation events. However, in analyzing the contributions where intensity is considered, both station data and satellite products were observed to be dominated by short-duration light precipitation events (≥ 60 %). These results indicate that during the southwest monsoon season in the Philippines, the main drivers for PA and PF are short-duration light precipitation events, whereas PI may be driven more by localized rain showers. This may indicate that GSMaP_G is more suitable for examining hourly precipitation events that are more frequent but have a lower intensity, whereas IMERG_F may prove to be more useful when analyzing hourly precipitation events with higher intensities such as localized rain showers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8600,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Research","volume":"317 ","pages":"Article 107983"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169809525000754","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Philippines faces the challenge of having a limited number of rain-gauge stations, which are a vital source of observation data. Satellite-based precipitation data is a viable alternative; however, it is necessary to assess the strengths and weaknesses of these products over various regions in the Philippines. This study analyzes the performance of two leading products from the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission, namely: GSMaP_G v08 and IMERG_F v07. In particular, the diurnal cycle of precipitation in the Philippines during the southwest monsoon season (May to September) from 2013 to 2018 is assessed, in terms of precipitation amount (PA), frequency (PF) and intensity (PI), which has not been done in previous works. Results show that GSMaP_G outperforms IMERG_F in capturing the diurnal cycle for PA and PF, whereas IMERG_F better captures PI as GSMaP_G tends to underestimate PI consistently. In terms of timing, peak values for PA (PPA) and PF (PPF) have similar patterns for both station data and satellite products where these events develop during the afternoon to evening hours (15 to 18 Local Standard Time). Further examination of the possible drivers of these observed patterns suggests that for both station data and IMERG_F, short-duration events have the highest frequency contribution (≥ 60 %), while GSMaP_G has higher contribution (≥ 40 %) from long-duration precipitation events. However, in analyzing the contributions where intensity is considered, both station data and satellite products were observed to be dominated by short-duration light precipitation events (≥ 60 %). These results indicate that during the southwest monsoon season in the Philippines, the main drivers for PA and PF are short-duration light precipitation events, whereas PI may be driven more by localized rain showers. This may indicate that GSMaP_G is more suitable for examining hourly precipitation events that are more frequent but have a lower intensity, whereas IMERG_F may prove to be more useful when analyzing hourly precipitation events with higher intensities such as localized rain showers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估GSMaP和IMERG在代表菲律宾西南季风季节降水日循环方面的表现
菲律宾面临着雨量观测站数量有限的挑战,而雨量观测站是观测数据的重要来源。基于卫星的降水数据是一个可行的替代方案;然而,有必要评估这些产品在菲律宾不同地区的优势和劣势。本文分析了全球降水测量(GPM)任务的两个主要产品GSMaP_G v08和IMERG_F v07的性能。特别是对菲律宾2013 - 2018年西南季风季节(5 - 9月)降水的日循环进行了评估,从降水量(PA)、频率(PF)和强度(PI)三个方面进行了评估,这是以往工作中没有做过的。结果表明,GSMaP_G在捕获PA和PF的日周期方面优于IMERG_F,而IMERG_F更好地捕获PI,因为GSMaP_G倾向于始终低估PI。在时间方面,PA (PPA)和PF (PPF)的峰值在站点数据和卫星产品中具有相似的模式,这些事件发生在下午到晚上(当地标准时间15到18点)。对这些观测到的模式的可能驱动因素的进一步研究表明,对于站资料和IMERG_F,短持续时间事件的频率贡献最高(≥60%),而GSMaP_G的贡献更高(≥40%)来自长持续时间降水事件。然而,在分析考虑强度的贡献时,观测到站资料和卫星产品都以短持续时间轻降水事件为主(≥60%)。这些结果表明,在菲律宾西南季风季节,PA和PF的主要驱动因素是短时间的轻降水事件,而PI可能更多地受到局地阵雨的驱动。这可能表明GSMaP_G更适合于检查更频繁但强度较低的逐小时降水事件,而IMERG_F可能在分析较高强度的逐小时降水事件(如局部阵雨)时更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Research
Atmospheric Research 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
460
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes scientific papers (research papers, review articles, letters and notes) dealing with the part of the atmosphere where meteorological events occur. Attention is given to all processes extending from the earth surface to the tropopause, but special emphasis continues to be devoted to the physics of clouds, mesoscale meteorology and air pollution, i.e. atmospheric aerosols; microphysical processes; cloud dynamics and thermodynamics; numerical simulation, climatology, climate change and weather modification.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics and major circulation patterns of diverse compound heat and precipitation extremes over South China Effects of the Biosurfactant Rhamnolipid on the hygroscopicity and cloud condensation nuclei activity (CCN) of ammonium sulfate aerosols Causes of spatial distribution of daytime convection initiation in Hainan Island Cloud vertical structure features from two-year Ka-band cloud radar measurements in Hefei, East China Understanding the stable intensity patterns of extratropical cyclogenesis over East China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1