CEO-board directional age difference and R&D of firms: Examining the moderation effects of strategic orientation

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104815
Saikat Banerjee
{"title":"CEO-board directional age difference and R&D of firms: Examining the moderation effects of strategic orientation","authors":"Saikat Banerjee","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the influence of CEO-board age differences on a firm's R&amp;D intensity through the lens of the Knowledge-Based View, considering how strategic orientations such as digital, entrepreneurial, and long-term focus moderate this relationship. Drawing on the KBV, the research posits that age diversity between CEOs and board members enhances the firm's knowledge base by combining diverse experiences, insights, and cognitive styles, thereby fostering innovation. Using data from 309 Indian firms listed on the NSE 500 index between 2007 and 2016, the findings demonstrate that a digital orientation strengthens the positive impact of CEO-board age differences on R&amp;D intensity by facilitating knowledge creation and sharing. Conversely, an entrepreneurial orientation may weaken this relationship by focusing more on immediate market opportunities than on sustained knowledge development. A long-term orientation further amplifies the positive linkage by aligning diverse leadership knowledge with sustained innovation objectives. This study contributes to the strategic management literature by clarifying how leadership demographic diversity, viewed through a knowledge-based perspective, influences a firm's ability to generate and leverage knowledge for innovation, thereby optimizing R&amp;D outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 104815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825001283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the influence of CEO-board age differences on a firm's R&D intensity through the lens of the Knowledge-Based View, considering how strategic orientations such as digital, entrepreneurial, and long-term focus moderate this relationship. Drawing on the KBV, the research posits that age diversity between CEOs and board members enhances the firm's knowledge base by combining diverse experiences, insights, and cognitive styles, thereby fostering innovation. Using data from 309 Indian firms listed on the NSE 500 index between 2007 and 2016, the findings demonstrate that a digital orientation strengthens the positive impact of CEO-board age differences on R&D intensity by facilitating knowledge creation and sharing. Conversely, an entrepreneurial orientation may weaken this relationship by focusing more on immediate market opportunities than on sustained knowledge development. A long-term orientation further amplifies the positive linkage by aligning diverse leadership knowledge with sustained innovation objectives. This study contributes to the strategic management literature by clarifying how leadership demographic diversity, viewed through a knowledge-based perspective, influences a firm's ability to generate and leverage knowledge for innovation, thereby optimizing R&D outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Leadership, institutional autonomy, and cross-sector collaboration: Catalysts for change in a survey of China's public sector employees When giving social support is beneficial for well-being? Differentiation and integration: The addressee perspective-taking strategy in three-party conversation Autonomy and risk perception in Congo Basin developmental systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1