Framework for Adoption of Enabling Technologies for Improved Outcomes in Spine Surgery.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1177/21925682251323277
Sathish Muthu, Swaminathan Ramasubramanian, Madhan Jeyaraman, Roger Hartl, Javad Tavakoli, Samuel K Cho, Laura Scaramuzzo, Hardeep Singh, Philip K Louie, Andreas K Demetriades, Patrick C Hsieh, Stipe Ćorluka, Yabin Wu, Xiaolong Chen, Hai V Le, Gianluca Vadala, Waeel Hamouda, Zorica Buser, Jeffrey C Wang, Hans-Jorg Meisel, Tim Yoon, Amit Jain
{"title":"Framework for Adoption of Enabling Technologies for Improved Outcomes in Spine Surgery.","authors":"Sathish Muthu, Swaminathan Ramasubramanian, Madhan Jeyaraman, Roger Hartl, Javad Tavakoli, Samuel K Cho, Laura Scaramuzzo, Hardeep Singh, Philip K Louie, Andreas K Demetriades, Patrick C Hsieh, Stipe Ćorluka, Yabin Wu, Xiaolong Chen, Hai V Le, Gianluca Vadala, Waeel Hamouda, Zorica Buser, Jeffrey C Wang, Hans-Jorg Meisel, Tim Yoon, Amit Jain","doi":"10.1177/21925682251323277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Narrative Review.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to investigate the integration and impact of enabling technologies, such as augmented reality, virtual reality, mixed reality, navigation, robotics, and artificial intelligence within the domain of spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We made a literature review for articles that examined the progression of adoption from initial to subsequent adopters. We also analysed the key determinants that influence adopting these technologies into clinical settings. These include cost-effectiveness, ease of integration, patient acceptance, learning curves, and availability of training resources. Based on the available data a suggestion has been made on the adoption framework for clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These technological advancements have the potential to transform surgical practice, offering improved precision and efficiency. The journey toward widespread adoption presents challenges, which include the financial implications, the necessity for specialized training, and the complexities associated with integration. To navigate these hurdles, the study proposes recommendations aimed at improving cost efficiency, streamlining technology integration, investing in professional development, and nurturing a culture of innovation and research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A framework has been established for the evaluation and integration of state-of-the-art technologies in spinal surgery, thereby maximizing their potential impact on surgical outcomes and patient welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251323277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251323277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Narrative Review.

Objectives: We aim to investigate the integration and impact of enabling technologies, such as augmented reality, virtual reality, mixed reality, navigation, robotics, and artificial intelligence within the domain of spinal surgery.

Methods: We made a literature review for articles that examined the progression of adoption from initial to subsequent adopters. We also analysed the key determinants that influence adopting these technologies into clinical settings. These include cost-effectiveness, ease of integration, patient acceptance, learning curves, and availability of training resources. Based on the available data a suggestion has been made on the adoption framework for clinical utility.

Results: These technological advancements have the potential to transform surgical practice, offering improved precision and efficiency. The journey toward widespread adoption presents challenges, which include the financial implications, the necessity for specialized training, and the complexities associated with integration. To navigate these hurdles, the study proposes recommendations aimed at improving cost efficiency, streamlining technology integration, investing in professional development, and nurturing a culture of innovation and research.

Conclusions: A framework has been established for the evaluation and integration of state-of-the-art technologies in spinal surgery, thereby maximizing their potential impact on surgical outcomes and patient welfare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor: Is Endoscopic Surgery a Safe and Effective Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. The Association Between Clival Axial Angle and Distal Junctional Failure After Craniocervical Fusion. Framework for Adoption of Enabling Technologies for Improved Outcomes in Spine Surgery. Predicting Surgical and Non-surgical Curvature Correction by Radiographic Spinal Flexibility Assessments for Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Practices and Preferences in the Use of Osteobiologics for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1