Use of superparamagnetic iron oxide for sentinel lymph node detection following neoadjuvant systemic therapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Ejso Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109684
M.R. Boland , E. Pantiora , C. Rutherford , D. Evoy , R.S. Prichard , F. Warnberg , S. Eriksson , A. Karakatsanis
{"title":"Use of superparamagnetic iron oxide for sentinel lymph node detection following neoadjuvant systemic therapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"M.R. Boland ,&nbsp;E. Pantiora ,&nbsp;C. Rutherford ,&nbsp;D. Evoy ,&nbsp;R.S. Prichard ,&nbsp;F. Warnberg ,&nbsp;S. Eriksson ,&nbsp;A. Karakatsanis","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Superparamagnetic iron oxide(SPIO) is used increasingly in sentinel lymph node(SLN) identification in breast cancer patients. Identification ratios in the upfront setting are comparable to that of radioisotope and blue dye(RI/BD). However, its use in the neoadjuvant(NACT) setting remains under debate. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of SPIO in breast cancer patients receiving NACT followed by surgery. A systematic review of major databases was performed. Studies examining SPIO compared to standard of care(RI/BD) for SLN detection after NACT were included. Primary outcomes included individual detection rate(nodal detection) and nodal detection rate (number of nodes detected). Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was performed to assess results certainty. Study quality was assessed using the MINORS tool for observational studies. Five studies involving 374 patients were included. Regarding individual detection rate, SPIO was successful in 308/314 patients and RI in 297/314 patients. Pooled individual detection rates for SPIO and RI were 98.1 % vs 94.6 %(weighted Risk Ratio 1.02,95 % CI 0.99,1.05,p = 0.18; I<sup>2</sup> = 24.3 %). Four studies examined nodal detection rates. Within these studies, a total of 625 SLNs were retrieved with 569 detected with SPIO and 468 with RI(mean: 2.26 SLN for SPIO and 1.86 for RI) with a respective nodal detection rate of 91.0 % vs 74.9 %(weighted Risk Ratio:1.25,95 % CI 1.06,1.47,p &lt; 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 89.6). The median MINORS score was 19/24(range 14–24), denoting good quality. In patients treated with NACT, SPIO performed comparably to RI, but seems to identify more SLNs. Routine use of SPIO in the neoadjuvant setting should be considered safe and effective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 109684"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074879832500112X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Superparamagnetic iron oxide(SPIO) is used increasingly in sentinel lymph node(SLN) identification in breast cancer patients. Identification ratios in the upfront setting are comparable to that of radioisotope and blue dye(RI/BD). However, its use in the neoadjuvant(NACT) setting remains under debate. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of SPIO in breast cancer patients receiving NACT followed by surgery. A systematic review of major databases was performed. Studies examining SPIO compared to standard of care(RI/BD) for SLN detection after NACT were included. Primary outcomes included individual detection rate(nodal detection) and nodal detection rate (number of nodes detected). Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was performed to assess results certainty. Study quality was assessed using the MINORS tool for observational studies. Five studies involving 374 patients were included. Regarding individual detection rate, SPIO was successful in 308/314 patients and RI in 297/314 patients. Pooled individual detection rates for SPIO and RI were 98.1 % vs 94.6 %(weighted Risk Ratio 1.02,95 % CI 0.99,1.05,p = 0.18; I2 = 24.3 %). Four studies examined nodal detection rates. Within these studies, a total of 625 SLNs were retrieved with 569 detected with SPIO and 468 with RI(mean: 2.26 SLN for SPIO and 1.86 for RI) with a respective nodal detection rate of 91.0 % vs 74.9 %(weighted Risk Ratio:1.25,95 % CI 1.06,1.47,p < 0.001; I2 = 89.6). The median MINORS score was 19/24(range 14–24), denoting good quality. In patients treated with NACT, SPIO performed comparably to RI, but seems to identify more SLNs. Routine use of SPIO in the neoadjuvant setting should be considered safe and effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of combined surgery with intraoperative radiotherapy and postoperative PVC for hepatocellular carcinoma with mPVTT Diagnostic performance of fluorescent lymphography-guided lymph node dissection during minimally invasive gastrectomy following chemotherapy Long-term survival analysis after radical gastrectomy for Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer: A multicenter study Simultaneous versus delayed resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis Successful pregnancy following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal malignancies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1