Apply the 4 lenses to the self-study process to identify blind spots and opportunities

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102321
Kim D. Tanzer , Tonya Jackson (Formerly Martin) , Nancy A. Alvarez , Jeremy Hughes
{"title":"Apply the 4 lenses to the self-study process to identify blind spots and opportunities","authors":"Kim D. Tanzer ,&nbsp;Tonya Jackson (Formerly Martin) ,&nbsp;Nancy A. Alvarez ,&nbsp;Jeremy Hughes","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) requires that all Doctor of Pharmacy programs complete a comprehensive self-study and associated report on a regular cycle. At first glance, success seems to be dependent upon nothing more than structured project management. However, often the process can be perceived as confusing, burdensome, and stressful. This uneasiness suggests that there may be vulnerabilities in the self-study process that must be acknowledged. Failure to do so may result in lack of buy-in and low motivation. Anticipating blind spots may avoid negative outcomes and result in a positive, team-oriented process. Herein, we propose a holistic and inclusive approach to reframing the self-study process by applying the concept of Bolman and Deal's four frames.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 5","pages":"Article 102321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129725000425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) requires that all Doctor of Pharmacy programs complete a comprehensive self-study and associated report on a regular cycle. At first glance, success seems to be dependent upon nothing more than structured project management. However, often the process can be perceived as confusing, burdensome, and stressful. This uneasiness suggests that there may be vulnerabilities in the self-study process that must be acknowledged. Failure to do so may result in lack of buy-in and low motivation. Anticipating blind spots may avoid negative outcomes and result in a positive, team-oriented process. Herein, we propose a holistic and inclusive approach to reframing the self-study process by applying the concept of Bolman and Deal's four frames.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将这四种视角应用到自学过程中,找出盲点和机会
药学教育认证委员会(ACPE)要求所有的药学博士课程都要完成一个全面的自学和定期的相关报告。乍一看,成功似乎仅仅依赖于结构化的项目管理。然而,这个过程往往会被认为是令人困惑的、繁重的和有压力的。这种不安表明,自学过程中可能存在必须承认的漏洞。如果做不到这一点,可能会导致缺乏认同和低积极性。预测盲点可以避免负面结果,从而形成积极的、以团队为导向的过程。在此,我们运用Bolman和Deal的四个框架的概念,提出了一个整体和包容的方法来重新构建自我学习过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
期刊最新文献
Guided professional identity formation framework: A model for mentorship-driven growth in pharmacy students Integration of Specialty Pharmacy in U.S. Pharmacy Curricula: A Survey of Didactic and Experiential Education Metacognition in doctor of pharmacy students and the impacts of Covid-19 Exploring pharmacy professionals insights for advancing the pharmacy curriculum: A qualitative study Career development barriers encountered by Taiwanese pharmacy students: A qualitative study across levels of career adaptability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1