Microbiological and Ergonomic Effects of Three Prototypes of a Device to Reduce Aerosol Dispersion in Dental Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dentistry Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-26 DOI:10.3390/dj13020054
Camila N Baldasso, Ruy Teichert-Filho, Daniel R Marinowic, Maria M Campos, Maximiliano S Gomes
{"title":"Microbiological and Ergonomic Effects of Three Prototypes of a Device to Reduce Aerosol Dispersion in Dental Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Camila N Baldasso, Ruy Teichert-Filho, Daniel R Marinowic, Maria M Campos, Maximiliano S Gomes","doi":"10.3390/dj13020054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: This randomized clinical trial evaluated the microbiological efficacy and the ergonomic impact of three prototypes of a device to reduce aerosol dispersion during dental procedures. <b>Methods</b>: Sixty patients undergoing dental care using high-speed turbines and/or ultrasonic tips were randomly assigned to 4 groups (<i>n</i> = 15): CG: control group, with standard personal protective equipment (PPE); G1: PPE + acrylic device (AD) with aspiration; G2: PPE + AD without aspiration; and G3: PPE + polyvinyl chloride device. The device prototypes consisted of a rigid translucent acrylic structure (G1 and G2), or a rigid PVC tube structure surrounded by layers of translucent flexible PVC films (G3), adjusted to the dental chair, involving the patient's head, neck and chest. The main outcome was the microbiological analysis (mean Δ of CFU at 10 different sites), and the secondary outcome was the ergonomic evaluation (questionnaire to dentists and patients). <b>Results</b>: The final sample comprised 59 participants (mean age 38.6 ± 11.4 years, 55.2% male). The overall mean time for dental procedures was 32.4 ± 16.9 min, with no differences between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.348). Microbiological analyses showed that the use of the device significantly reduced contamination in the light reflector (01.46 ± 4.43 ΔCFU in G2 vs. 19.25 ± 36.50 ΔCFU in CG; <i>p</i> = 0.028), apron (09.11 ± 12.05 ΔCFU in G3 vs. 21.14 ± 43.41 ΔCFU in GC; <i>p</i> = 0.044), and face shield (08.80 ± 32.70 ΔCFU in G1 vs. 56.78 ± 76.64 ΔCFU in the GC; <i>p</i> = 0.017). The device was well accepted by patients and increased the dentists' perception of safety and protection (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but significantly decreased ergonomics related to the clinical view, space, agility and access to the patient, and ease of performing procedures (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: The tested device can be an additional tool for infection prevention and control in dentistry, not only during the COVID-19 pandemic, but also for the control of future infectious diseases and epidemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13020054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This randomized clinical trial evaluated the microbiological efficacy and the ergonomic impact of three prototypes of a device to reduce aerosol dispersion during dental procedures. Methods: Sixty patients undergoing dental care using high-speed turbines and/or ultrasonic tips were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 15): CG: control group, with standard personal protective equipment (PPE); G1: PPE + acrylic device (AD) with aspiration; G2: PPE + AD without aspiration; and G3: PPE + polyvinyl chloride device. The device prototypes consisted of a rigid translucent acrylic structure (G1 and G2), or a rigid PVC tube structure surrounded by layers of translucent flexible PVC films (G3), adjusted to the dental chair, involving the patient's head, neck and chest. The main outcome was the microbiological analysis (mean Δ of CFU at 10 different sites), and the secondary outcome was the ergonomic evaluation (questionnaire to dentists and patients). Results: The final sample comprised 59 participants (mean age 38.6 ± 11.4 years, 55.2% male). The overall mean time for dental procedures was 32.4 ± 16.9 min, with no differences between groups (p = 0.348). Microbiological analyses showed that the use of the device significantly reduced contamination in the light reflector (01.46 ± 4.43 ΔCFU in G2 vs. 19.25 ± 36.50 ΔCFU in CG; p = 0.028), apron (09.11 ± 12.05 ΔCFU in G3 vs. 21.14 ± 43.41 ΔCFU in GC; p = 0.044), and face shield (08.80 ± 32.70 ΔCFU in G1 vs. 56.78 ± 76.64 ΔCFU in the GC; p = 0.017). The device was well accepted by patients and increased the dentists' perception of safety and protection (p < 0.001), but significantly decreased ergonomics related to the clinical view, space, agility and access to the patient, and ease of performing procedures (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The tested device can be an additional tool for infection prevention and control in dentistry, not only during the COVID-19 pandemic, but also for the control of future infectious diseases and epidemics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间牙科护理中减少气溶胶弥散装置的三种原型的微生物学和人体工程学效果:随机对照临床试验。
目的:本随机临床试验评估了三种原型装置的微生物功效和人体工程学影响,以减少牙科手术过程中气溶胶的分散。方法:60例使用高速涡轮和/或超声针尖进行牙科护理的患者随机分为4组(n = 15): CG:对照组,使用标准个人防护装备(PPE);G1: PPE +吸压装置(AD);G2: PPE + AD无抽吸;G3: PPE +聚氯乙烯装置。设备原型包括刚性半透明丙烯酸结构(G1和G2),或者由半透明柔性PVC薄膜层包围的刚性PVC管结构(G3),调整到牙科椅,涉及患者的头部,颈部和胸部。主要结果是微生物学分析(10个不同部位CFU的平均值Δ),次要结果是人体工程学评价(对牙医和患者进行问卷调查)。结果:最终样本包括59名参与者(平均年龄38.6±11.4岁,男性55.2%)。总体平均牙科手术时间为32.4±16.9 min,组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.348)。微生物学分析表明,使用该装置可显著减少光反射镜中的污染(G2组为01.46±4.43 ΔCFU, CG组为19.25±36.50 ΔCFU;p = 0.028), G3组为0.9.11±12.05 ΔCFU, GC组为21.14±43.41 ΔCFU;p = 0.044), G1组为08.80±32.70 ΔCFU, GC组为56.78±76.64 ΔCFU;P = 0.017)。患者对该装置的接受度较高,增加了牙医对安全性和保护的感知(p < 0.001),但在临床视野、空间、灵活性和接近患者以及操作过程的便利性方面显著降低了人体工程学(p < 0.001)。结论:该试验装置不仅可以在本次新冠肺炎大流行期间,还可以为今后的传染病和流行病的控制提供额外的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dental Adhesion Protocol: A Clinically Oriented Literature Review with Practical Guidelines. Dental Amalgam and Oral Biological Responses: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence. Three-Dimensional Displacement Patterns in Maxillary Molar Distalization: A Comparative Finite Element Study. Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Dental Implants Placed and Restored by AEGD Residents: Up to 10-Year Retrospective Study. Partial Ceramic Veneers as a Conservative Restorative Strategy: A Narrative Review with Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1