Turkish Adaptation and Validation of Patient Participation Questionnaire (PPQ).

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.3390/healthcare13040358
Adil Aydoğdu, Mehmet Yorulmaz
{"title":"Turkish Adaptation and Validation of Patient Participation Questionnaire (PPQ).","authors":"Adil Aydoğdu, Mehmet Yorulmaz","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13040358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The concept of patient participation is increasingly recognized as an important component in many areas, such as redesigning healthcare processes, improving patient safety, increasing satisfaction, and managing chronic diseases. In this context, measuring the level of patient participation in healthcare services is an important factor. The \"Patient Participation Questionnaire\" is a tool used to assess patients' evaluations of their participation in their in-hospital care. The absence of a scale in the Turkish literature that measures this concept reveals the importance of this research. <b>Methods</b>: In this study conducted in a tertiary public hospital in Turkey, the final scale translated into Turkish was applied to 355 people using the convenience sampling method. In addition to the \"Patient Participation Scale\", the \"Patient Satisfaction Scale\" was used for context validity in the study. Data were analyzed with SPSS 27 and AMOS programs. <b>Results</b>: As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, the scale, which originally consisted of 16 questions and four dimensions, was adapted to Turkish as 14 questions and four dimensions. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness of fit values of the scale were found to be x<sup>2</sup>/sd = 2.53, GFI = 0.93, AGFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.066, RMR = 0.041, and NFI = 0.90. These values are within the acceptable and good fit level ranges. As a result of the correlation analysis performed for context validity, it was determined that there was a positive significant relationship between the adapted patient participation scale and the patient satisfaction scale (r = 0.692, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In addition, the internal consistency coefficient of the scale was examined to determine the reliability of the scale, and it was revealed that the scale was reliable at a good level (α = 0.86). <b>Conclusions</b>: Based on the findings, it was revealed that the \"Patient Participation Scale\" developed in English is a valid and reliable measurement tool in Turkish culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13040358","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The concept of patient participation is increasingly recognized as an important component in many areas, such as redesigning healthcare processes, improving patient safety, increasing satisfaction, and managing chronic diseases. In this context, measuring the level of patient participation in healthcare services is an important factor. The "Patient Participation Questionnaire" is a tool used to assess patients' evaluations of their participation in their in-hospital care. The absence of a scale in the Turkish literature that measures this concept reveals the importance of this research. Methods: In this study conducted in a tertiary public hospital in Turkey, the final scale translated into Turkish was applied to 355 people using the convenience sampling method. In addition to the "Patient Participation Scale", the "Patient Satisfaction Scale" was used for context validity in the study. Data were analyzed with SPSS 27 and AMOS programs. Results: As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, the scale, which originally consisted of 16 questions and four dimensions, was adapted to Turkish as 14 questions and four dimensions. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness of fit values of the scale were found to be x2/sd = 2.53, GFI = 0.93, AGFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.066, RMR = 0.041, and NFI = 0.90. These values are within the acceptable and good fit level ranges. As a result of the correlation analysis performed for context validity, it was determined that there was a positive significant relationship between the adapted patient participation scale and the patient satisfaction scale (r = 0.692, p < 0.001). In addition, the internal consistency coefficient of the scale was examined to determine the reliability of the scale, and it was revealed that the scale was reliable at a good level (α = 0.86). Conclusions: Based on the findings, it was revealed that the "Patient Participation Scale" developed in English is a valid and reliable measurement tool in Turkish culture.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其患者参与问卷(PPQ)的改编和验证。
背景/目的:患者参与的概念越来越被认为是许多领域的重要组成部分,例如重新设计医疗保健流程、改善患者安全、提高满意度和管理慢性病。在这种情况下,衡量患者参与医疗保健服务的程度是一个重要因素。“患者参与问卷”是一种用于评估患者对其参与院内护理的评价的工具。土耳其文献中缺乏衡量这一概念的尺度,这表明了这项研究的重要性。方法:本研究在土耳其某三级公立医院进行,采用方便抽样法对355人进行最终量表翻译成土耳其语。本研究除使用“患者参与量表”外,还使用“患者满意度量表”来评估情境效度。采用SPSS 27和AMOS软件对数据进行分析。结果:经验证性因子分析,原来由16个问题4个维度组成的量表调整为土耳其语的14个问题4个维度。经验证性因子分析,量表的拟合优度为x2/sd = 2.53, GFI = 0.93, AGFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.066, RMR = 0.041, NFI = 0.90。这些值在可接受和良好的拟合水平范围内。通过对上下文效度进行相关分析,确定适应患者参与量表与患者满意度量表之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.692, p < 0.001)。此外,对量表的内部一致性系数进行了检验,以确定量表的信度,结果表明,量表的信度在较好的水平上(α = 0.86)。结论:基于研究结果,揭示了英语“患者参与量表”在土耳其文化中是一个有效和可靠的测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
A Novel Homozygous Truncating CD8A Variant (p.Arg107Ter) in a Patient with Recurrent Sinopulmonary Infections: A Case Report and Literature Review. Design Consistency and Aesthetic Experience in Digital Health Communication: A Mixed-Method Study of Lifestyle Medicine Product Ecosystems. Usability of a Patch-Type Ultrasound System for Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring: A Simulation Study in Anesthesiologists. Perceptions of the Body in Cerebral Palsy: Voices of Family Caregivers. Real-Time Integration of an AI-Based ECG Interpretation System in the Emergency Department: A Pragmatic Alternating-Day Study of Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Process Metrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1