Croatian Translation and Initial Psychometric Validation of the Negative Behaviors in Health Care Questionnaire.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING Nursing Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.3390/nursrep15020069
Vesna Bušac, Nikolina Kanceljak, Ana Žepina Puzić, Ivona Ljevak
{"title":"Croatian Translation and Initial Psychometric Validation of the Negative Behaviors in Health Care Questionnaire.","authors":"Vesna Bušac, Nikolina Kanceljak, Ana Žepina Puzić, Ivona Ljevak","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15020069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: This cross-sectional study aimed to produce an adapted Croatian version of the Negative Behaviors in Health Care Questionnaire and to validate it. <b>Methods</b>: The process comprised the translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire. Clinical specialists and qualified bilingual speakers participated in both forward and backward translation. Face validity was tested. The survey's original developer approved the final version. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using the test-retest method and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and assessments of divergent and convergent validity were conducted. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 and R, program version 3.5.2., for Windows. <b>Results</b>: A five-factor structure was obtained and confirmed via CFA, although not all fit coefficients were satisfactory. The internal consistency reliability was 0.86 for the contributing factors and the seriousness of aggression, 0.79 for the use of aggression, 0.95 for the fear of retaliation, and 0.83 for the frequency of aggression; in total, α = 0.88. Test-retest reliability was moderate. All correlations were statistically significant, and the correlation was the highest for seriousness (0.754) and frequency of aggression (0.725) and the lowest for contributing factors (0.528). Test-retest reliability was satisfactory. Statistically significant differences were found when comparing respondents by gender, age, work experience, education, and hierarchical position. <b>Conclusions</b>: The adapted, translated, and validated survey provides a valuable tool for assessing lateral and vertical aggression between and towards nurses in terms of contributing factors, frequency, severity, uses of aggression, and fear of retaliation.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15020069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to produce an adapted Croatian version of the Negative Behaviors in Health Care Questionnaire and to validate it. Methods: The process comprised the translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire. Clinical specialists and qualified bilingual speakers participated in both forward and backward translation. Face validity was tested. The survey's original developer approved the final version. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using the test-retest method and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and assessments of divergent and convergent validity were conducted. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 and R, program version 3.5.2., for Windows. Results: A five-factor structure was obtained and confirmed via CFA, although not all fit coefficients were satisfactory. The internal consistency reliability was 0.86 for the contributing factors and the seriousness of aggression, 0.79 for the use of aggression, 0.95 for the fear of retaliation, and 0.83 for the frequency of aggression; in total, α = 0.88. Test-retest reliability was moderate. All correlations were statistically significant, and the correlation was the highest for seriousness (0.754) and frequency of aggression (0.725) and the lowest for contributing factors (0.528). Test-retest reliability was satisfactory. Statistically significant differences were found when comparing respondents by gender, age, work experience, education, and hierarchical position. Conclusions: The adapted, translated, and validated survey provides a valuable tool for assessing lateral and vertical aggression between and towards nurses in terms of contributing factors, frequency, severity, uses of aggression, and fear of retaliation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生保健问卷中消极行为的克罗地亚语翻译与初步心理计量学验证。
背景/目的:本横断面研究旨在编制一份克罗地亚版的卫生保健消极行为问卷,并对其进行验证。方法:对问卷进行翻译、文化适应和心理测评。临床专家和合格的双语者参与了前向和后向翻译。进行面部效度测试。该调查的原始开发者批准了最终版本。问卷的信度采用重测法和Cronbach’s alpha系数进行评估。进行了探索性和验证性因素分析以及发散效度和收敛效度评估。采用SPSS 21.0和R软件3.5.2对收集到的数据进行分析。,适用于Windows。结果:虽然不是所有的拟合系数都令人满意,但通过CFA得到并证实了一个五因子结构。影响因素和攻击严重性的内部一致性信度分别为0.86、0.79、0.95和0.83;总的来说,α = 0.88。重测信度中等。所有相关性均具有统计学意义,其中严重性和攻击频率相关性最高(0.754),影响因素相关性最低(0.528)。重测信度令人满意。在比较受访者的性别、年龄、工作经验、教育程度和等级地位时,发现了统计学上显著的差异。结论:经过改编、翻译和验证的调查为评估护士之间和对护士的横向和纵向攻击提供了一个有价值的工具,包括影响因素、频率、严重程度、攻击的使用和对报复的恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Symptom Clusters and Related Factors of Late Toxicities in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors After Radiation Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study. Secondary Traumatic Stress Among Emergency Medical Personnel: A Cross-Sectional Study in Romania. Nurses' Perspectives on the Non-Pharmacological Management of Oral Mucositis in Onco-Hematological Care: A Qualitative Content Analysis. Psychosocial Workplace Environments Enabling Sustainable Employment for People with Mental Health Conditions: A Scoping Review. How Do Culturally and Racially Marginalised (CaRM) Populations in Australia Cope with the Mental Health Impacts from "New Racism"? A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1