Using digitally delivered measurement-based care in substance use disorder treatment: qualitative analysis of patients' perspectives.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1080/00952990.2025.2458626
Tessa Frohe, Eliza B Cohn, Madeline C Frost, Tascha R Johnson, Kevin A Hallgren
{"title":"Using digitally delivered measurement-based care in substance use disorder treatment: qualitative analysis of patients' perspectives.","authors":"Tessa Frohe, Eliza B Cohn, Madeline C Frost, Tascha R Johnson, Kevin A Hallgren","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2025.2458626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Measurement-based care (MBC) is a clinical practice where patients complete standardized outcome measures throughout treatment to monitor clinical progress and inform clinical decision-making. However, MBC is rarely adopted in routine substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. We developed a digital MBC system and pilot tested it in an outpatient adult community SUD treatment setting.<i>Objectives:</i> The current study aims to characterize qualitative feedback from the pilot participants about their experiences using the MBC system in SUD treatment, focusing on perceived benefits, drawbacks, and suggestions for improvement.<i>Methods:</i> Participants (<i>N</i> = 30; <i>n</i> = 11 female 37%) completed weekly MBC questionnaires via smartphone for 6 months and completed structured interviews at 6-, 12-, and 24-weeks. Themes were identified using a combination of inductive/deductive thematic analysis.<i>Results:</i> Participants highlighted several benefits of using the digital MBC system, including improved self-reflection (e.g. goal clarification, noticing changes over time), treatment enhancement (e.g. improving patient-clinician communication, extending the reach of treatment beyond scheduled sessions), and ease-of-use (e.g. brief, understandable questions). Drawbacks were less frequently expressed and included limited integration with clinical care, repetitiveness of questionnaires, and some questions being difficult to answer. Suggestions included making elements more personalized and improving interactivity with the digital interface.<i>Conclusion:</i> Patients report several benefits of integrating digitally delivered MBC into SUD treatment, along with recommendations that may improve its usability and usefulness. Integrating MBC technology into SUD treatment may potentially aid patients by enhancing self-reflection, facilitating more efficient communication with clinicians, and extending the reach of treatment beyond scheduled treatment sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2025.2458626","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Measurement-based care (MBC) is a clinical practice where patients complete standardized outcome measures throughout treatment to monitor clinical progress and inform clinical decision-making. However, MBC is rarely adopted in routine substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. We developed a digital MBC system and pilot tested it in an outpatient adult community SUD treatment setting.Objectives: The current study aims to characterize qualitative feedback from the pilot participants about their experiences using the MBC system in SUD treatment, focusing on perceived benefits, drawbacks, and suggestions for improvement.Methods: Participants (N = 30; n = 11 female 37%) completed weekly MBC questionnaires via smartphone for 6 months and completed structured interviews at 6-, 12-, and 24-weeks. Themes were identified using a combination of inductive/deductive thematic analysis.Results: Participants highlighted several benefits of using the digital MBC system, including improved self-reflection (e.g. goal clarification, noticing changes over time), treatment enhancement (e.g. improving patient-clinician communication, extending the reach of treatment beyond scheduled sessions), and ease-of-use (e.g. brief, understandable questions). Drawbacks were less frequently expressed and included limited integration with clinical care, repetitiveness of questionnaires, and some questions being difficult to answer. Suggestions included making elements more personalized and improving interactivity with the digital interface.Conclusion: Patients report several benefits of integrating digitally delivered MBC into SUD treatment, along with recommendations that may improve its usability and usefulness. Integrating MBC technology into SUD treatment may potentially aid patients by enhancing self-reflection, facilitating more efficient communication with clinicians, and extending the reach of treatment beyond scheduled treatment sessions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
期刊最新文献
A case series examining the efficacy of gabapentin as a substitution therapy for the treatment of pregabalin use disorder. Speed and accuracy of online searches by legislators and medical students using RefBin's opioid use disorder database. Using digitally delivered measurement-based care in substance use disorder treatment: qualitative analysis of patients' perspectives. Readiness to stop smoking and subsequent switching away to electronic nicotine delivery systems among adults who smoke cigarettes. Adolescent binge drinking in male Wistar rats increases ethanol consumption and reduces intoxication sensitivity in early adulthood without affecting withdrawal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1