Factors associated with nonparticipation and loss to follow-up in bereavement research using data from a cohort of parents with a loss in pregnancy or the neonatal period.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Death Studies Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1080/07481187.2025.2469138
Sofie Mørk, Sören Möller, Maja O'Connor, Tine Brink Henriksen, Dorte Hvidtjørn
{"title":"Factors associated with nonparticipation and loss to follow-up in bereavement research using data from a cohort of parents with a loss in pregnancy or the neonatal period.","authors":"Sofie Mørk, Sören Möller, Maja O'Connor, Tine Brink Henriksen, Dorte Hvidtjørn","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2025.2469138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Factors shaping participation in longitudinal cohorts may introduce bias, but there is a lack of research concerning participation patterns in cohorts of bereaved. Our aim was to study this in a longitudinal cohort of parents with a loss in pregnancy or during the neonatal period. Using data from the Danish national registers we identified all parents who experienced a pregnancy or neonatal loss in 2016-2018 and linked that with data on participants from the Life After the Loss cohort. Analyzing 725 parents, baseline participation was 25.7%, with 72.6% and 59.7% continuing at the seven- and 13-month follow-up. Partners and parents with lower education were underrepresented at baseline and at follow-up. Although not statistically significant, substantial underrepresentation of parents with mental health conditions and of parents who lived alone was observed at baseline. Although initial participation was low, after enrollment, most parents engaged in follow-up, minimizing the risk of attrition bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":11041,"journal":{"name":"Death Studies","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Death Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2025.2469138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Factors shaping participation in longitudinal cohorts may introduce bias, but there is a lack of research concerning participation patterns in cohorts of bereaved. Our aim was to study this in a longitudinal cohort of parents with a loss in pregnancy or during the neonatal period. Using data from the Danish national registers we identified all parents who experienced a pregnancy or neonatal loss in 2016-2018 and linked that with data on participants from the Life After the Loss cohort. Analyzing 725 parents, baseline participation was 25.7%, with 72.6% and 59.7% continuing at the seven- and 13-month follow-up. Partners and parents with lower education were underrepresented at baseline and at follow-up. Although not statistically significant, substantial underrepresentation of parents with mental health conditions and of parents who lived alone was observed at baseline. Although initial participation was low, after enrollment, most parents engaged in follow-up, minimizing the risk of attrition bias.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在丧亲研究中与不参与和随访缺失相关的因素,该研究使用了一组在妊娠期或新生儿期失去亲人的父母的数据。
影响纵向队列参与的因素可能会引入偏倚,但缺乏关于丧亲者队列参与模式的研究。我们的目的是研究这一纵向队列父母在怀孕期间或在新生儿时期的损失。使用丹麦国家登记册的数据,我们确定了2016-2018年期间经历怀孕或新生儿损失的所有父母,并将其与“失去后的生活”队列参与者的数据联系起来。对725名家长进行分析,基线参与率为25.7%,其中72.6%和59.7%在7个月和13个月的随访中继续参与。在基线和随访中,受教育程度较低的伴侣和父母的代表性不足。虽然在统计上没有显著意义,但在基线时观察到有精神健康状况的父母和独居父母的代表性明显不足。虽然最初的参与率很低,但在入学后,大多数家长都参与了随访,最大限度地降低了损耗偏差的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Death Studies
Death Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Now published ten times each year, this acclaimed journal provides refereed papers on significant research, scholarship, and practical approaches in the fast growing areas of bereavement and loss, grief therapy, death attitudes, suicide, and death education. It provides an international interdisciplinary forum in which a variety of professionals share results of research and practice, with the aim of better understanding the human encounter with death and assisting those who work with the dying and their families.
期刊最新文献
Associations between social network characteristics and suicidal thoughts among refugees in the Southwest U.S. Homecare workers' experiences of providing transpersonal palliative care: A qualitative, arts‑based explorative study. "I had no hug": The grief and resilience of older women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reorganizing bonds: A qualitative exploration of the bereavement experience of adult only children losing their parent. Suicide bereavement in men: A qualitative study of barriers and enablers to seeking support.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1