Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound, MRI, and Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in the Preoperative Evaluation of Parotid Gland Tumors.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.3390/jcm14041342
Sebastian Stoia, Anca Ciurea, Mihaela Băciuț, Simion Bran, Gabriel Armencea, Emil Boțan, Manuela Lenghel, Tiberiu Tamaș, Rareș Mocan, Daniel Leucuța, Grigore Băciuț, Cristian Dinu
{"title":"Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound, MRI, and Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in the Preoperative Evaluation of Parotid Gland Tumors.","authors":"Sebastian Stoia, Anca Ciurea, Mihaela Băciuț, Simion Bran, Gabriel Armencea, Emil Boțan, Manuela Lenghel, Tiberiu Tamaș, Rareș Mocan, Daniel Leucuța, Grigore Băciuț, Cristian Dinu","doi":"10.3390/jcm14041342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The objective of this study was to compare the value of ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the preoperative evaluation of parotid tumors. <b>Methods:</b> A three-year prospective study, including 35 patients, was conducted. Preoperative ultrasound, MRI, and US-guided FNAB were performed on each patient, after which an imaging and cytological diagnosis was obtained. Each patient underwent surgical treatment. The imaging and cytological diagnoses were compared with the histopathological reports. <b>Results:</b> Ultrasound and MRI showed the same diagnostic performance in discriminating benign from malignant parotid tumors: sensitivity-80%, specificity-97%, and accuracy-94%. In this regard, FNAB registered a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 97%, and 97%, respectively. US, MRI, and FNAB were recorded as having high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumors. <b>Conclusions:</b> Ultrasound and US-guided FNAB allow for the preoperative differential diagnosis of parotid tumors located in the superficial lobe. When US and FNAB results are inconclusive, MRI becomes mandatory.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the value of ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the preoperative evaluation of parotid tumors. Methods: A three-year prospective study, including 35 patients, was conducted. Preoperative ultrasound, MRI, and US-guided FNAB were performed on each patient, after which an imaging and cytological diagnosis was obtained. Each patient underwent surgical treatment. The imaging and cytological diagnoses were compared with the histopathological reports. Results: Ultrasound and MRI showed the same diagnostic performance in discriminating benign from malignant parotid tumors: sensitivity-80%, specificity-97%, and accuracy-94%. In this regard, FNAB registered a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 97%, and 97%, respectively. US, MRI, and FNAB were recorded as having high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumors. Conclusions: Ultrasound and US-guided FNAB allow for the preoperative differential diagnosis of parotid tumors located in the superficial lobe. When US and FNAB results are inconclusive, MRI becomes mandatory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声、MRI和细针穿刺活检在腮腺肿瘤术前评估中的诊断准确性比较。
背景:本研究的目的是比较超声(US)、磁共振成像(MRI)和超声引导下细针穿刺活检(FNAB)在腮腺肿瘤术前评估中的价值。方法:对35例患者进行为期3年的前瞻性研究。术前对每位患者进行超声、MRI和超声引导下的FNAB检查,然后进行影像学和细胞学诊断。每位患者均接受手术治疗。将影像学和细胞学诊断与组织病理学报告进行比较。结果:超声与MRI对腮腺良恶性肿瘤的诊断表现一致,敏感性80%,特异性97%,准确性94%。在这方面,FNAB的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为100%、97%和97%。US、MRI和FNAB对多形性腺瘤和Warthin瘤的诊断准确率较高。结论:超声和超声引导下的FNAB可用于腮腺浅叶肿瘤的术前鉴别诊断。当US和FNAB结果不确定时,MRI是强制性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Sex-Based Differences in Management and Outcomes of Patients Admitted or Transferred to Advanced Therapy Centers for Heart Failure. Psychosocial Determinants Among Hospital and Primary Healthcare Professionals Towards Cancer and Cancer Patients in Croatia. Disease Activity Trajectories During Pregnancy Predict Medically Indicated Complications in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Bevacizumab-Based Therapy Is Associated with Prolonged Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Peritoneal Mucinous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Beyond Glycemic Control: GLP-1RA-Based Therapies and Emerging Targets Beyond the Metabolic Axis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1