Comparison of treatment efficacy and cost-effectiveness of rituximab and oral agents among patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a population-based cohort study.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864251314020
Hye Lim Lee, Minwoong Kang, Jin Myoung Seok, Byung-Jo Kim, Byoung Joon Kim
{"title":"Comparison of treatment efficacy and cost-effectiveness of rituximab and oral agents among patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a population-based cohort study.","authors":"Hye Lim Lee, Minwoong Kang, Jin Myoung Seok, Byung-Jo Kim, Byoung Joon Kim","doi":"10.1177/17562864251314020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rituximab (RTX) is a well-known effective treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of RTX treatment in patients with NMOSD and compared medical expenses between RTX and other oral agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the National Health Insurance System database (2010-2021), we compared the time to the first relapse and medical expenses after each medication between groups with RTX and oral agents. Also, we analyzed the association between the level of disability and the type of drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 899 patients were included, and they were divided into two groups according to the type of treatment. The group treated with RTX had a lower risk of relapse than those treated with other oral agents (hazard ratio, 0.479, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Regarding medical expenses, the increase in total medical costs was associated with the use of RTX and the number of relapses. The increase in medical costs was higher in cases with increased disability owing to NMOSD after adjustment for the number of relapses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comparison to other oral agents, RTX showed a favorable treatment effect. It is also relatively cost-effective, considering the change in disability in a large-scale real-world nationwide study.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251314020"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864251314020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rituximab (RTX) is a well-known effective treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).

Aims: To investigate the effectiveness of RTX treatment in patients with NMOSD and compared medical expenses between RTX and other oral agents.

Methods: Using data from the National Health Insurance System database (2010-2021), we compared the time to the first relapse and medical expenses after each medication between groups with RTX and oral agents. Also, we analyzed the association between the level of disability and the type of drugs.

Results: A total of 899 patients were included, and they were divided into two groups according to the type of treatment. The group treated with RTX had a lower risk of relapse than those treated with other oral agents (hazard ratio, 0.479, p < 0.001). Regarding medical expenses, the increase in total medical costs was associated with the use of RTX and the number of relapses. The increase in medical costs was higher in cases with increased disability owing to NMOSD after adjustment for the number of relapses.

Conclusion: In comparison to other oral agents, RTX showed a favorable treatment effect. It is also relatively cost-effective, considering the change in disability in a large-scale real-world nationwide study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利妥昔单抗和口服药物治疗视神经脊髓炎患者的疗效和成本-效果比较:一项基于人群的队列研究
背景:利妥昔单抗(RTX)是一种众所周知的治疗视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍(NMOSD)的有效药物。目的:探讨RTX治疗NMOSD患者的疗效,并比较RTX与其他口服药物的医疗费用。方法:使用2010-2021年国民健康保险数据库数据,比较RTX组与口服药物组的首次复发时间和每次用药后的医疗费用。此外,我们还分析了残疾程度与药物类型之间的关系。结果:共纳入899例患者,按治疗方式分为两组。RTX治疗组复发风险低于其他口服药物治疗组(风险比,0.479,p)。结论:与其他口服药物相比,RTX治疗效果较好。考虑到在大规模的真实世界的全国性研究中残疾的变化,这也是相对划算的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
期刊最新文献
Real-world effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study integrating clinical, cognitive, and MRI outcomes. Pathophysiology of chronic subdural hematoma-new insights. Neuroglial markers of damage in autoimmune neurology. A Delphi consensus on integrating novel therapies into the management of generalized myasthenia gravis. Glymphatic dysfunction in drug-resistant epilepsy and its association with vagus nerve stimulation outcomes: a DTI-ALPS study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1