Implementing reablement for community dwelling people with dementia: A formative evaluation using single-case experimental design.

Alexis Campbell, Christopher J Poulos, Caroline Takla, Joy Allen, Kylie Lemsing, Claire Mc O'Connor
{"title":"Implementing reablement for community dwelling people with dementia: A formative evaluation using single-case experimental design.","authors":"Alexis Campbell, Christopher J Poulos, Caroline Takla, Joy Allen, Kylie Lemsing, Claire Mc O'Connor","doi":"10.1177/14713012251323941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reablement is recommended to maximise functioning in people with dementia, yet in Australia, is not routinely available. This study aimed to provide insight into the implementation and program outcomes of reablement in real-world practice for a person living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reablement was implemented for a client with dementia. In parallel, a formative mixed-methods pilot evaluation was performed, using single-case experimental A-B-A design (<i>n</i> = 1), supplemented by routinely collected pre-post program clinical measures. Implementation was evaluated qualitatively via clinical notes for fidelity, feasibility and client engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single-case experimental design outcomes indicated the program positively impacted the participant's physical functioning. Additionally, most routinely collected pre-post clinical measures demonstrated improvement. Intervention fidelity varied, with differences in length and client engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of evidence-informed reablement has been shown to be feasible in real-world practice for a community-dwelling person living with dementia. Larger implementation trials are needed to build on preliminary outcomes to ultimately improve access to these important programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251323941"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251323941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reablement is recommended to maximise functioning in people with dementia, yet in Australia, is not routinely available. This study aimed to provide insight into the implementation and program outcomes of reablement in real-world practice for a person living with dementia.

Methods: Reablement was implemented for a client with dementia. In parallel, a formative mixed-methods pilot evaluation was performed, using single-case experimental A-B-A design (n = 1), supplemented by routinely collected pre-post program clinical measures. Implementation was evaluated qualitatively via clinical notes for fidelity, feasibility and client engagement.

Results: Single-case experimental design outcomes indicated the program positively impacted the participant's physical functioning. Additionally, most routinely collected pre-post clinical measures demonstrated improvement. Intervention fidelity varied, with differences in length and client engagement.

Conclusion: Implementation of evidence-informed reablement has been shown to be feasible in real-world practice for a community-dwelling person living with dementia. Larger implementation trials are needed to build on preliminary outcomes to ultimately improve access to these important programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:为最大限度地发挥痴呆症患者的功能,我们建议进行康复治疗,但在澳大利亚,康复治疗并不是一项常规措施。本研究旨在深入探讨在现实世界中为痴呆症患者实施的康复治疗的实施情况和计划成果:方法:为一名痴呆症患者实施了康复训练。与此同时,还采用单例实验 A-B-A 设计(n = 1)进行了形成性混合方法试点评估,并辅以日常收集的项目实施前-实施后临床测量结果。通过临床笔记对实施的忠实度、可行性和客户参与度进行了定性评估:结果:单一案例实验设计结果表明,该计划对参与者的身体机能产生了积极影响。此外,大多数常规收集的事后前临床测量结果表明,参与者的身体机能得到了改善。干预的保真度各不相同,在时间长度和客户参与度方面也存在差异:结论:对居住在社区的痴呆症患者而言,在现实世界的实践中实施循证再适应疗法是可行的。需要在初步成果的基础上进行更大规模的实施试验,以最终提高这些重要计划的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Caring for an older person with dementia: Behavioral problems in the eyes of family caregivers and migrant home care workers. Coming to terms with a changing everyday life with dementia: What can we learn from people who are diagnosed while still working? Public officials' attitudes towards public participation in policymaking by people with dementia. Implementing reablement for community dwelling people with dementia: A formative evaluation using single-case experimental design. Effectiveness of an educational intervention on mealtime support needs for people with dementia in residential care facilities: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1