Perceived infection risk, infection exposure, and compliance to infection control measures among the first COVID-19 patients in Norway.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1177/14034948251315341
Bjørn Sætrevik, Rebecca J Cox, Dagrun W Linchausen, Sebastian B Bjørkheim
{"title":"Perceived infection risk, infection exposure, and compliance to infection control measures among the first COVID-19 patients in Norway.","authors":"Bjørn Sætrevik, Rebecca J Cox, Dagrun W Linchausen, Sebastian B Bjørkheim","doi":"10.1177/14034948251315341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to assess how infected patients viewed risk. We investigated whether cases infected early in the pandemic had assessed the risk to be lower, been more exposed and took fewer precautions to prevent infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We asked first-wave Norwegian COVID-19 patients (<i>n</i> = 88) to recall how they had thought about risk of infection, exposure in potential infectious situations and their compliance to infection control measures early in the pandemic. Answers from this group were compared WITH emergency room patients with non-pulmonary complaints (<i>n</i> = 75) and with a nationally representative sample (<i>n</i> = 4083).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both patient groups saw the risk as lower than did the representative sample. Contact with infected people was more frequent for the COVID-19 patients than for the other patients. More of the COVID-19 patients had travelled abroad immediately before the outbreak. COVID-19 patients complied less with the infection control measures than did the representative sample. The COVID-19 patients agreed less than the other patients with a statement that they had 'complied in general'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>Risk-behaviour was overrepresented among the first COVID-19 patients. Potential memory artefacts should be considered when interpreting the results.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"517-524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12159351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948251315341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to assess how infected patients viewed risk. We investigated whether cases infected early in the pandemic had assessed the risk to be lower, been more exposed and took fewer precautions to prevent infection.

Methods: We asked first-wave Norwegian COVID-19 patients (n = 88) to recall how they had thought about risk of infection, exposure in potential infectious situations and their compliance to infection control measures early in the pandemic. Answers from this group were compared WITH emergency room patients with non-pulmonary complaints (n = 75) and with a nationally representative sample (n = 4083).

Results: Both patient groups saw the risk as lower than did the representative sample. Contact with infected people was more frequent for the COVID-19 patients than for the other patients. More of the COVID-19 patients had travelled abroad immediately before the outbreak. COVID-19 patients complied less with the infection control measures than did the representative sample. The COVID-19 patients agreed less than the other patients with a statement that they had 'complied in general'.

Conclusions: Risk-behaviour was overrepresented among the first COVID-19 patients. Potential memory artefacts should be considered when interpreting the results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威首批COVID-19患者的感知感染风险、感染暴露和感染控制措施依从性
目的:2019冠状病毒病大流行为评估感染患者如何看待风险提供了独特的机会。我们调查了在大流行早期感染的病例是否评估风险较低,暴露程度较高,预防感染的预防措施较少。方法:我们询问挪威第一批COVID-19患者(n = 88),回忆他们在大流行早期如何考虑感染风险、暴露于潜在感染环境以及遵守感染控制措施。将该组的回答与非肺部疾病的急诊室患者(n = 75)和全国代表性样本(n = 4083)进行比较。结果:两组患者认为风险低于代表性样本。新冠肺炎患者与感染者的接触频率高于其他患者。更多的COVID-19患者在疫情爆发前立即出国旅行。COVID-19患者对感染控制措施的遵守程度低于代表性样本。COVID-19患者比其他患者更不同意他们“一般遵守”的说法。结论:在首批COVID-19患者中,风险行为被过度代表。在解释结果时应该考虑潜在的内存工件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
期刊最新文献
Waiting day reimbursement for the first sickness absence day among blue-collar workers in retail and wholesale during the pandemic. Beyond the education-health gradient: the importance of early-life and lifestyle factors for health-related quality of life: A Norwegian cohort study. The evolution of health inequalities in the western world: From early origins to modern times. Ukrainian refugees' experiences with the Danish healthcare system: A survey-based study. Surveillance systems and strategies, and levels of physical activity and fitness for school-aged children and adolescents in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1