Esthetic perception of mandibular anterior teeth during speech and dynamic smile.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.01.015
Roberta Mancebo Camara, Claudia Trindade Mattos, Alexandre Trindade Motta
{"title":"Esthetic perception of mandibular anterior teeth during speech and dynamic smile.","authors":"Roberta Mancebo Camara, Claudia Trindade Mattos, Alexandre Trindade Motta","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated the esthetic perception of the mandibular anterior teeth during speech by comparing the assessments of laypeople (LP) and orthodontists (ODs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Class I occlusion model was filmed pronouncing \"Czechoslovakia\" and smiling. Dynamic smile and speech images were extracted and digitally manipulated to create various dental conditions: ideal alignment, mandibular canine extrusion, mandibular incisor crowding, inclined mandibular occlusal plane, mandibular incisor diastema, and mandibular incisor extraction simulation. Forty-eight participants from each group (LP and ODs) evaluated images using visual analog scales. Statistical analysis employed repeated measures analysis of variance with a 5% significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences appeared between evaluator group means except for the dynamic smile image. Dynamic smile images received the highest scores, followed by aligned and leveled teeth, both showing significant differences (P <0.05) from each other and the remaining images. Inclined occlusal plane and diastema images received the lowest scores. Group evaluations showed distinct patterns: ODs did not significantly differentiate between canine extrusion, crowding, inclined occlusal plane, and diastema images, whereas LP showed no significant differentiation between incisor extraction, canine extrusion, crowding, and diastema images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Speech images received lower attractiveness ratings than ideal occlusion in both groups. No significant differences appeared between LP and OD evaluations except for the dynamic smile image assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.01.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluated the esthetic perception of the mandibular anterior teeth during speech by comparing the assessments of laypeople (LP) and orthodontists (ODs).

Methods: A Class I occlusion model was filmed pronouncing "Czechoslovakia" and smiling. Dynamic smile and speech images were extracted and digitally manipulated to create various dental conditions: ideal alignment, mandibular canine extrusion, mandibular incisor crowding, inclined mandibular occlusal plane, mandibular incisor diastema, and mandibular incisor extraction simulation. Forty-eight participants from each group (LP and ODs) evaluated images using visual analog scales. Statistical analysis employed repeated measures analysis of variance with a 5% significance level.

Results: No significant differences appeared between evaluator group means except for the dynamic smile image. Dynamic smile images received the highest scores, followed by aligned and leveled teeth, both showing significant differences (P <0.05) from each other and the remaining images. Inclined occlusal plane and diastema images received the lowest scores. Group evaluations showed distinct patterns: ODs did not significantly differentiate between canine extrusion, crowding, inclined occlusal plane, and diastema images, whereas LP showed no significant differentiation between incisor extraction, canine extrusion, crowding, and diastema images.

Conclusions: Speech images received lower attractiveness ratings than ideal occlusion in both groups. No significant differences appeared between LP and OD evaluations except for the dynamic smile image assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
432
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
期刊最新文献
Lower lip changes after overjet reduction with and without mandibular incisor retraction. Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for dental and occlusal parameters using standardized clinical photographs. Bone mineral density and anatomic limitations of miniscrew placement at buccal interradicular sites: A quantitative computed tomography study. Esthetic perception of mandibular anterior teeth during speech and dynamic smile. Anchorage loss in maxillary premolar and anterior teeth during maxillary molar distalization in clear aligner treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1