Randomized prospective trial comparing ejaculatory preservation HoLEP versus standard HoLEP: the other face of the coin.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY World Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-05418-y
Ahmed Eliwa, Ali Aldarraji, Khaled Abdelwahab, Emad Salem
{"title":"Randomized prospective trial comparing ejaculatory preservation HoLEP versus standard HoLEP: the other face of the coin.","authors":"Ahmed Eliwa, Ali Aldarraji, Khaled Abdelwahab, Emad Salem","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05418-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laser Anatomical Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate (LAEEP) techniques offer a promising solution for patients seeking to alleviate urinary symptoms while preserving sexual function. The ejaculation preservation approach has been shown to achieve an impressive 90% success rate in maintaining antegrade ejaculation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the effect of the ejaculatory preservation HoLEP technique on postoperative continence and ejaculation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective randomized study adhering to CONSORT guidelines. Patients with prostate sizes between 40 and 80 gm, IPSS scores > 20, Qmax < 10 ml/s, and IIEF-5 scores  > 22 were eligible for inclusion. A total of 43 patients were randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n = 22) underwent HoLEP, while Group 2 (n = 21) underwent EP HoLEP. We assessed functional outcomes and ejaculatory dysfunction at baseline and 1-, 3-, and 6- month. The study period was from October 2022 to March 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 40 patients were analyzed. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement in Group 1, with IPSS (median 12.5, P < 0.006) and Qmax (median 15, P < 0.04) at 3-month. ICIQ-UI SF scores showed a significant difference in the incontinence episodes (domain Q3), which were lower (P < 0.023) in Group 2 compared to Group 1 during the 1-month visit. MSHQ-EjD-SF scores were significantly higher in Group 2 at both 3- and 6- month (P < 0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively). IIEF-5 scores showed no significant difference between both groups during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing the ejaculation preservation technique during HoLEP appears to improve early postoperative continence and preserve ejaculation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05418-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laser Anatomical Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate (LAEEP) techniques offer a promising solution for patients seeking to alleviate urinary symptoms while preserving sexual function. The ejaculation preservation approach has been shown to achieve an impressive 90% success rate in maintaining antegrade ejaculation.

Purpose: To explore the effect of the ejaculatory preservation HoLEP technique on postoperative continence and ejaculation.

Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective randomized study adhering to CONSORT guidelines. Patients with prostate sizes between 40 and 80 gm, IPSS scores > 20, Qmax < 10 ml/s, and IIEF-5 scores  > 22 were eligible for inclusion. A total of 43 patients were randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n = 22) underwent HoLEP, while Group 2 (n = 21) underwent EP HoLEP. We assessed functional outcomes and ejaculatory dysfunction at baseline and 1-, 3-, and 6- month. The study period was from October 2022 to March 2024.

Results: Data from 40 patients were analyzed. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement in Group 1, with IPSS (median 12.5, P < 0.006) and Qmax (median 15, P < 0.04) at 3-month. ICIQ-UI SF scores showed a significant difference in the incontinence episodes (domain Q3), which were lower (P < 0.023) in Group 2 compared to Group 1 during the 1-month visit. MSHQ-EjD-SF scores were significantly higher in Group 2 at both 3- and 6- month (P < 0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively). IIEF-5 scores showed no significant difference between both groups during the study period.

Conclusion: Implementing the ejaculation preservation technique during HoLEP appears to improve early postoperative continence and preserve ejaculation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
期刊最新文献
Bing chat for kidney stone management questions based on the AUA guidelines: a comparison of chatbot conversation style modes. Impact of graded detrusor preservation on continence in Retzius-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy. Environmental sustainability in urologic practices: a systematic review. Is flexible navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) safer and more efficient than conventional sheaths? Italian multicentric experience. Impact of peritoneal bladder flap in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients on lymphoceles: a prospective randomised trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1