Impact of pilot public hospital reform on efficiencies: a DEA analysis of county hospitals in East China, 2009-2015.

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Health Economics Review Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1186/s13561-025-00600-3
Wei Jiang, Xuyan Lou, Qiulin Chen, Lina Song, Zhuo Chen
{"title":"Impact of pilot public hospital reform on efficiencies: a DEA analysis of county hospitals in East China, 2009-2015.","authors":"Wei Jiang, Xuyan Lou, Qiulin Chen, Lina Song, Zhuo Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00600-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>China started a pilot public hospital reform in 2012 to improve governance and efficiency in healthcare services delivery among county-level hospitals. This study aims to investigate the impact of the pilot reform on hospital efficiency and productivity by using a unique dataset of county hospitals in East China during 2009-2015.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-stage approach is used. First, this study uses the output-oriented data envelopment analysis (DEA) to estimate hospital efficiency with variable returns to scale. Second, propensity score matching is used to address potential biases associated with the selection of counties for the pilot program. In the third stage, we assess the impact of the pilot reform on efficiency by using a Tobit Difference-in-Differences approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average level of hospital efficiency for the whole sample experienced a rapid drop in 2013, then returned to a peak in 2014. Except in the reform year (2012), the overall hospital efficiency for the post-reform period is higher than that for the pre-reform period. The baseline model results show that the pilot reform is associated with a 3% decline in pure technical efficiency and a 2.3% increase in hospital scale efficiency, respectively. Our findings are robust when we apply bootstrapped DEA efficiency scores and use different specifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study suggest no improvements in overall hospital efficiency associated with the pilot reform, possibly due to the combined effects of inefficient governance and hospital scale expansion. This study suggests that further efforts are needed to increase county hospital performance by strengthening management and optimizing resource utiliziation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00600-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: China started a pilot public hospital reform in 2012 to improve governance and efficiency in healthcare services delivery among county-level hospitals. This study aims to investigate the impact of the pilot reform on hospital efficiency and productivity by using a unique dataset of county hospitals in East China during 2009-2015.

Methods: A three-stage approach is used. First, this study uses the output-oriented data envelopment analysis (DEA) to estimate hospital efficiency with variable returns to scale. Second, propensity score matching is used to address potential biases associated with the selection of counties for the pilot program. In the third stage, we assess the impact of the pilot reform on efficiency by using a Tobit Difference-in-Differences approach.

Results: The average level of hospital efficiency for the whole sample experienced a rapid drop in 2013, then returned to a peak in 2014. Except in the reform year (2012), the overall hospital efficiency for the post-reform period is higher than that for the pre-reform period. The baseline model results show that the pilot reform is associated with a 3% decline in pure technical efficiency and a 2.3% increase in hospital scale efficiency, respectively. Our findings are robust when we apply bootstrapped DEA efficiency scores and use different specifications.

Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest no improvements in overall hospital efficiency associated with the pilot reform, possibly due to the combined effects of inefficient governance and hospital scale expansion. This study suggests that further efforts are needed to increase county hospital performance by strengthening management and optimizing resource utiliziation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Impact of pilot public hospital reform on efficiencies: a DEA analysis of county hospitals in East China, 2009-2015. What can we learn about the impact of cancelled planned operations on waiting times? A case study using the 2017/18 winter flu postponement policy in England. Catastrophic and impoverishing out-of-pocket health expenditure in Ethiopia: evidence from the Ethiopia socioeconomic survey. Modelling epidemiological and economics processes - the case of cervical cancer. The heterogeneous association between education and the adoption of safe food handling practices in Ethiopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1