Chimeric protein A/G conjugate based lateral flow assay for the rapid detection of brucellosis in multiple animal species

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of immunological methods Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jim.2025.113845
Rajeswari Shome , Sudipta Patra , Muneera Mohamed Sahib , G. Shanmugam , Somy Skariah , Samer Shamshad , Nagendra Nath Barman , Durlav Prasad Bora , Arijit Shome , Triveni Kalleshamurthy , Nagalingam Mohandoss , Bibek Ranjan Shome
{"title":"Chimeric protein A/G conjugate based lateral flow assay for the rapid detection of brucellosis in multiple animal species","authors":"Rajeswari Shome ,&nbsp;Sudipta Patra ,&nbsp;Muneera Mohamed Sahib ,&nbsp;G. Shanmugam ,&nbsp;Somy Skariah ,&nbsp;Samer Shamshad ,&nbsp;Nagendra Nath Barman ,&nbsp;Durlav Prasad Bora ,&nbsp;Arijit Shome ,&nbsp;Triveni Kalleshamurthy ,&nbsp;Nagalingam Mohandoss ,&nbsp;Bibek Ranjan Shome","doi":"10.1016/j.jim.2025.113845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study highlights diagnostic efficacy of chimeric protein A/G based lateral flow assay (LFA) for on-spot diagnosis of brucellosis in various livestock species. The test device was developed using chimeric protein A/G conjugated with 40 nm colloidal gold nanoparticles as detection reagent having a strong binding affinity specifically IgG isotypes in multiple livestock species. Known positive and negative control sera samples from three livestock species and 36 Gram-negative bacterial cross-reactive hyper immune sera were used for determining the analytical sensitivity (ASn) and specificity (ASp), respectively. The diagnostic performance of LFA was evaluated in comparison with RBPT (Rose Bengal Plate Test) and indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA) using 652 small ruminants, 532 bovine and 241 pig samples. The analytical sensitivity of LFA was observed up to 1:1280, 1:2560, and 1:10240 dilutions in bovine, small ruminants and pigs samples, respectively. Similarly, non-reactive to 35 Gram-negative bacterial cross-reactive hyper immune sera showed high ASp for LFA test except mild reactivity with <em>Y. enterocolitca</em> O9. Considering RBPT as gold standard, the diagnostic sensitivity (DSn) of protein A/G based LFA in infected farm samples was 93.9 (86.3–97.9) in small ruminants, 84.6 (54.5–98.1) in cattle and 96.5 (82.2–99.9) in swine. Considering iELISA as gold standard, the DSn of LFA was 96.3 (89.4–99.2) in small ruminants, 90 (55.5–99.7) in cattle and 96.7 (82.8–99.9) in swine. The higher performance efficacy of the LFA tests developed in this study outlines the practicality of using these rapid, easy to perform, highly sensitive and specific devices for on-spot screening of brucellosis in livestock species, which in-turn facilitate prevention, control and management of disease transmission in farms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunological methods","volume":"539 ","pages":"Article 113845"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022175925000456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study highlights diagnostic efficacy of chimeric protein A/G based lateral flow assay (LFA) for on-spot diagnosis of brucellosis in various livestock species. The test device was developed using chimeric protein A/G conjugated with 40 nm colloidal gold nanoparticles as detection reagent having a strong binding affinity specifically IgG isotypes in multiple livestock species. Known positive and negative control sera samples from three livestock species and 36 Gram-negative bacterial cross-reactive hyper immune sera were used for determining the analytical sensitivity (ASn) and specificity (ASp), respectively. The diagnostic performance of LFA was evaluated in comparison with RBPT (Rose Bengal Plate Test) and indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA) using 652 small ruminants, 532 bovine and 241 pig samples. The analytical sensitivity of LFA was observed up to 1:1280, 1:2560, and 1:10240 dilutions in bovine, small ruminants and pigs samples, respectively. Similarly, non-reactive to 35 Gram-negative bacterial cross-reactive hyper immune sera showed high ASp for LFA test except mild reactivity with Y. enterocolitca O9. Considering RBPT as gold standard, the diagnostic sensitivity (DSn) of protein A/G based LFA in infected farm samples was 93.9 (86.3–97.9) in small ruminants, 84.6 (54.5–98.1) in cattle and 96.5 (82.2–99.9) in swine. Considering iELISA as gold standard, the DSn of LFA was 96.3 (89.4–99.2) in small ruminants, 90 (55.5–99.7) in cattle and 96.7 (82.8–99.9) in swine. The higher performance efficacy of the LFA tests developed in this study outlines the practicality of using these rapid, easy to perform, highly sensitive and specific devices for on-spot screening of brucellosis in livestock species, which in-turn facilitate prevention, control and management of disease transmission in farms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于 Himeric 蛋白 A/G 结合物的横向流动分析法,用于快速检测多种动物的布鲁氏菌病。
本研究强调了基于嵌合蛋白A/G的横向流动试验(LFA)对多种家畜布鲁氏菌病现场诊断的有效性。该检测装置以嵌合蛋白A/G与40 nm胶体金纳米粒子偶联为检测试剂,对多种家畜具有很强的特异性IgG同型结合亲和力。采用3种家畜已知阳性和阴性对照血清和36份革兰氏阴性细菌交叉反应超免疫血清,分别测定分析灵敏度(ASn)和特异性(ASp)。采用652只小反刍动物、532头牛和241头猪,与RBPT(玫瑰孟加拉平板试验)和间接酶联免疫吸附试验(iELISA)进行比较,评价LFA的诊断性能。LFA在牛、小反刍动物和猪样品中的分析灵敏度分别达到1:1280、1:2560和1:10240的稀释度。同样,对35革兰氏阴性细菌交叉反应性超免疫血清无反应,除对小肠结肠炎Y. O9有轻微反应外,对LFA试验显示高ASp。以RBPT为金标准,小反刍动物、牛和猪的LFA诊断灵敏度分别为93.9(86.3-97.9)、84.6(54.5-98.1)和96.5(82.2-99.9)。以iELISA为金标准,小反刍动物LFA的DSn为96.3(89.4 ~ 99.2),牛为90(55.5 ~ 99.7),猪为96.7(82.8 ~ 99.9)。本研究开发的LFA测试具有较高的性能效果,说明使用这些快速、易于执行、高灵敏度和特异性的设备现场筛查牲畜品种中的布鲁氏菌病的实用性,从而促进了农场疾病传播的预防、控制和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Immunological Methods is devoted to covering techniques for: (1) Quantitating and detecting antibodies and/or antigens. (2) Purifying immunoglobulins, lymphokines and other molecules of the immune system. (3) Isolating antigens and other substances important in immunological processes. (4) Labelling antigens and antibodies. (5) Localizing antigens and/or antibodies in tissues and cells. (6) Detecting, and fractionating immunocompetent cells. (7) Assaying for cellular immunity. (8) Documenting cell-cell interactions. (9) Initiating immunity and unresponsiveness. (10) Transplanting tissues. (11) Studying items closely related to immunity such as complement, reticuloendothelial system and others. (12) Molecular techniques for studying immune cells and their receptors. (13) Imaging of the immune system. (14) Methods for production or their fragments in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. In addition the journal will publish articles on novel methods for analysing the organization, structure and expression of genes for immunologically important molecules such as immunoglobulins, T cell receptors and accessory molecules involved in antigen recognition, processing and presentation. Submitted full length manuscripts should describe new methods of broad applicability to immunology and not simply the application of an established method to a particular substance - although papers describing such applications may be considered for publication as a short Technical Note. Review articles will also be published by the Journal of Immunological Methods. In general these manuscripts are by solicitation however anyone interested in submitting a review can contact the Reviews Editor and provide an outline of the proposed review.
期刊最新文献
PLGA-based nanovaccine delivering chimeric IpaD-StxB protein induces robust immune response against Shigella infection. Defining positivity in the lymphocyte transformation test with cytokine read-out: What is the best of bad choices? Establishment of reference intervals for serum TNF-α, IFN-α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17 and IFN-γ in healthy Chinese adults using flow cytometry Editorial Board Optimization of a versatile cell ELISA for detection of antibodies against membrane protein BCMA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1